From Emotion to Action: The Impact of Teachers’ Affective Attitudes on Intercultural Classroom Engagement

This study examines how teachers’ affective attitudes toward non-Chinese students relate to their evaluations of learning outcomes, teaching engagement, and perceptions of learning difficulties in intercultural classrooms. Based on 196 valid questionnaires from Chinese primary school teachers in Selangor, Malaysia, the study adopts a quantitative cross-sectional design using descriptive and inferential analyses. Results show that teachers’ affective attitudes (like / dislike / neutral) are not significantly associated with their teaching engagement or evaluations, indicating professional consistency beyond emotional preference. Background variables such as age, qualification, and homeroom status show no moderating effects. However, affective attitudes are significantly related to perceived learning difficulties (χ² = 30.7, p < .01, Cramér’s V = 0.280): teachers with positive attitudes emphasize expressive and literacy challenges, while negative-attitude teachers focus on memory and uncontrollable barriers. The findings suggest that affective attitudes influence teaching indirectly through attributional perceptions rather than direct behavioral engagement.

affective attitudes, teaching engagement

1. Abacıoğlu, C. S., Karataş, Ş., & Gür, H. (2019). Teachers' multicultural attitudes and perspective taking as predictors of culturally responsive teaching. Frontiers in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alrabai, F., & Algazzaz, W. (2024). The influence of teacher emotional support on language learners’ basic psychological needs, emotions, and emotional engagement: Treatment-based evidence. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 14(3), 453–482. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.39329 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Burić, I. (2023). Teacher emotions are related to students' ratings of teaching quality: joy positively, anger and anxiety negatively. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101822 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches(5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Donahue-Keegan, D., Villegas-Reimers, E., & Cressey, J. M. (2019). Integrating social-emotional learning and culturally responsive teaching in teacher education preparation programs: The Massachusetts experience. Teacher Education Quarterly [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching. Educational Leadership, 72(7), 37–41. (Definition cited in EdWeek article) https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/culturally-responsive-teaching-culturally-responsive-pedagogy/2022/04 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. C. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Letzel, V. (2023). Challenging but positive! – An exploration into teacher attitude profiles based on their attitudes towards differentiated instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12535 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. McLean, L., & Jones, N. (2025). Emotional transmission in the classroom: how teachers’ emotional expressions affect students’ learning attitudes. Contemporary Educational Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Leigh McLean, Nathan Jones. (2025). Using an observational measure of elementary teachers’ emotional expressions during mathematics and English language arts to explore associations with students’ content area emotions and engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102352. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Schwab, S., & Alnahdi, G. H. (2023). Does the same teacher’s attitude fit all students? Uncovering student-specific variance of teachers’ attitudes towards all of their students. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(14), 3502–3517. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2221235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Stark, K., Cummings, C. (2023). Emotions as Both a Tool and a Liability: A Phenomenology of Urban Charter School Teachers’ Emotions.Urban Rev 55, 337–363 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-022-00649-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sun L, Zhang H and Xu J (2021). Factor Structure and Validation of the Undergraduate Teaching Faculty Investment Questionnaire. Front. Psychol. 11:593571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593571 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Tang Y and Hu J (2022) The impact of teacher attitude and teaching approaches on student demotivation: Disappointment as a mediator. Front. Psychol. 13:985859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.985859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study