Gendered Dimensions of Marital Celebrations: A Comparative Analysis of Women's and Men's Experiences and Perceptions

This research presents an affluent analysis of the gendered dynamics of marriage celebrations and how women and men build differently the cultural, symbolic, and social features of marriage. Based on qualitative comparative research employing data from focus group discussions and in-depth interviews, this study discovers women positioned at the symbolic centre of marriage rituals. Their increased public visibility as dress, ritual practice, and performative acts is a necessary means of social recognition and identity validation. Men, by contrast, adopt primarily a muted, matter-of-fact option, stipulating marriage in terms of economic duty and stable long-term availability as opposed to symbolic exhibition. Findings account for how wedding festivals are a powerful location for confirming classic gender roles: women's celebratory centrality simultaneously confirms their social status and rehearses patriarchal obligation, while men's quiet presence announces persistent cultural scripts of masculinity concerning provision and dominance. This research adds to more general arguments in the academy around gender, identity, and cultural performance because it shows how celebration cultures are both empowering and limiting spaces. The paper concludes by advocating for more inclusive marital practices that balance symbolic visibility with shared responsibility and recommends further cross-cultural research to explore the evolution of marital rituals in the context of shifting global gender norms.

Gender differences, marital celebrations, women's visibility, cultural identity

1. Akinyi, M. (2022). Mediated weddings and gender performance in Kenyan urban culture. African Journal of Gender and Culture Studies, 14(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/20426776.2022.2023456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Allendorf, K. (2013). Schemas of marital change: From arranged marriages to eloping for love. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(2), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baxter, J. (2005). The work of love: The gendered labour of wedding planning. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Boden, S. (2003). Consumerism, romance and the wedding experience. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalisation of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage, a history: From obedience to intimacy or how love conquered marriage. Viking Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Donnelly, S. (2011). Bridal identities: Gender performance and the social meanings of weddings. Journal of Gender Studies, 20(4), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2011.617602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Durkheim, E. (1997). The division of labour in society (L. A. Coser, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1893) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458–476). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Geller, J. (2001). Here comes the bride: Women, weddings, and the marriage mystique. Random House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Illouz, E. (1997). Consuming the romantic utopia: Love and the cultural contradictions of capitalism. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ingraham, C. (1999). White weddings: Romancing heterosexuality in popular culture. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Jankowiak, W. R., & Allen, E. R. (2017). The world of romantic love. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kimmel, M. S. (1996). Manhood in America: A cultural history. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. McGuire, K. (2020). #Bridezilla: The performance of gender on wedding-themed social media. New Media & Society, 22(5), 837–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819872913 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mkhize, N. (2016). Marriage, family, and traditional practices in South Africa. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press. https://doi.org/10.14426/ukzn.2016.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mukherjee, R. (2023). Digital dowries: social media, modernisation, and the aesthetics of marriage in India. Asian Journal of Social and Cultural Studies, 9(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/19764374.2023.1904672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Oakley, A. (1972). Sex, gender and society. Temple Smith. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Obioma, N. (2018). The rituals of spouse hood: An anthropological study of marriage in West Africa. University of Lagos Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Otnes, C., & Pleck, E. H. (2003). Cinderella dreams: The allure of the lavish wedding. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Silberschmidt, M. (2001). Disempowerment of men in rural and urban East Africa: Implications for male identity and sexual behaviour. World Development, 29(4), 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00122-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class & gender: Becoming respectable. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Slaughter, A. M. (2019). The digital bride: Gender, social media, and the modern wedding. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 48(5), 671–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241619832401 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Townsend, N. W. (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work and fatherhood in men's lives. Temple University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. Doubleday. https://archive.org/details/caseformarriagew00wait [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wignell, P. (2021). Egalitarian unions: A study of gender-neutral marriage practices in Scandinavia. Nordic Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Exploring Gender Narratives: Femininity and Masculinity in Health and Commercial Advertising in the Philippines
• Assessing the Impact of Gender Mainstreaming Policies and Programs on Gender Equality in Caraga Region, Philippines: A Quantitative Survey-Based Analysis
• Gendered Coping Patterns: Advancing Healthy Help-Seeking Behaviours in Men
• From Panoptic Control to Quiet Resistance: Navigating Gendered Childhoods and Emerging Agency in Rajshahi, Bangladesh
• The Gender Belief System of Maternal Health Service Stakeholders in Partido, Philippines