Gig Workers, No Guarantees: Industrial Relations and Non-Traditional Work Contracts

This article examines the evolving status of gig workers within Malaysia’s legal and industrial relations framework, critically assessing the inadequacy of current laws to meet the principles of industrial justice and international labour standards. The rapid expansion of digital platforms has led to the emergence of non-traditional work contracts that offer flexibility but lack fundamental protections typically afforded to formal employees. While schemes such as the Self Employment Social Security Scheme and voluntary contributions under i-Saraan exist, their non-mandatory nature limits coverage and fail to address broader concerns of social protection, job security and collective bargaining. The article explores how lifestyle philosophies such as minimalism and maximalism intersect with gig work preferences, while also foregrounding the psychological and emotional toll of precarious labour. Through doctrinal legal analysis and comparative study with jurisdictions such as the United States and Spain, the study identifies significant gaps in legal recognition and institutional safeguards. The findings underscore the structural vulnerabilities of gig workers, highlighting algorithmic control, absence of due process and exclusion from union representation as key deficits. The article concludes that a comprehensive reform of Malaysia’s labour laws is necessary to introduce a distinct legal category for gig workers, ensure mandatory contributions to social protection schemes and extend workplace rights that align with international benchmarks. This reform must also include emotional well-being provisions to create a more resilient and inclusive future for gig work.

Gig workers; Labour law; Social protection; Platform economy; Industrial relations

1. Abdullah, N., Ismail, M. M., Murad, M. S. H., Jusoff, K., Kurniawan, F., & Salahz, M. (2024). Critical insights into gig economy: A Peninsular Malaysia case study. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i1.5494 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amin, N. S. M. (2023). Balancing the rights of gig economy workers in the context of collective bargaining. IIUM Law Journal, 31(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31i1.834 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anuar, M. E. A., Abd Rahman, N. H., Ahmad, K. S., Harmain, H., Satrianto, A., & Mahadi, N. F. (2024). Diagnosing the well-being of gig workers in Malaysia: A viable system model approach. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(27), 44–53. https://ebpj.e-iph.co.uk/index.php/EBProceedings/article/view/5831/3160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bahu. (2024). The gig economy: Challenges and advantages for employers and employees. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. DevelopmentAid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://www.developmentaid.org/news-stream/post/183798/gig-economy-challenges-and-advantages [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bantuan Terkini. (2025). i-Saraan: Voluntary Contribution Scheme by EPF. Bantuan Terkini. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://bantuanterkini.com/i-saraan-voluntary-contribution-scheme-by-epf/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bernama. (2025). Gig Workers Bill 2025 to be tabled in March, says HR minister. The Edge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/745080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. D'Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2016). Positives outweighing negatives: The experiences of Indian crowdsourced workers. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 10(1), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.10.1.0044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Delouya, M. (2023, July 24). The rise of gig workers is changing the face of the US economy. CNN Business. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/24/economy/gig-workers-economy-impact-explained/index.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2024). Labour Force Survey, 3rd Quarter 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. https://www.dosm.gov.my [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. De Stefano, V., Durri, I., Stylogiannis, C., & Wouters, M. (2021). Platform work and the employment relationship (ILO Working Paper No. 27). International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_protect/@protrav/@travail/documen ts/publication/wcms_777866.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. De Stefano, V., & Aloisi, A. (2022). European legal framework on digital platform work. International Labour Review, 161(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12227 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2023). Algorithmic management and labour precarity in the gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 37(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211029536 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Duggan, J., Carbery, R., McDonnell, A., & Sherman, U. (2023). Algorithmic HRM control in the gig economy: The app‐worker perspective. Human Resource Management, 62(6), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Employees Provident Fund. (2023). i‑Saraan: EPF savings scheme for self‑employed persons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. https://www.kwsp.gov.my/en/self-employed/isarana [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Employees Provident Fund. (2024). i‑Saraan: Grow your retirement savings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. https://www.kwsp.gov.my/en/member/savings/i-saraan [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Employees Provident Fund. (2024). Self-contribution and voluntary contributions. https://www.kwsp.gov.my/en/member/savings/self-contribution [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work (COM/2021/762 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0762 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Garin, A., Jackson, E., Koustas, D. K., & Miller, A. (2023, May). The evolution of platform gig work, 2012–2021. Becker Friedman Institute. https://bfi.uchicago.edu/working-paper/2023-69/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ghai, D. (2003). Decent work: Concept and indicators. International Labour Review, 142(2), 113–145. https://webapps.ilo.org/public/english/revue/download/pdf/ghai.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ghaffary. (2019). Uber and Lyft say they don’t plan to reclassify their drivers as employees. Vox. https://www.vox.com/2019/9/11/20861599/ab-5-uber-lyft-drivers-contractors-reclassify-employees [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Harun, N., et. al. (2020). An experimental measure of Malaysia’s gig workers using labour force survey. Department of Statistics Malaysia. https://mbls.dosm.gov.my/mylmid/paper_a.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hyman. (2024). What California’s new labor law means for small businesses that work with contractors. Gusto. https://gusto.com/resources/articles/hr/team-management/ab5-small-businesses [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. International Labour Organization. (2006). Recommendation concerning the employment relationship (Recommendation No. 198). https://webapps.ilo.org/static/english/inwork/cb-policy-guide/employmentrelationshiprecommendation no198.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. International Labour Organization. (2018). Digital labour platforms and the future of work: Towards decent work in the online world. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40dgreports/%40dcomm/%40publ/docu ments/publication/wcms_645337.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. International Labour Organization. (2022). Asia–Pacific employment and social outlook 2022: Rethinking sectoral strategies for a human‑centred future of work. International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/@publ/documents/ publication/wcms_862410.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. International Labour Organization. (2025). International Labour Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. https://www.ilo.org/about-ilo/how-ilo-works [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Internal Revenue Service. (2025). Employee (common-law employee). U.S. Department of the Treasury. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/employee-common-law-employee [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training. (2024). Gig work in Japan: Issues and emerging trends. https://www.jil.go.jp/english/jli/documents/2024/050-05.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Jain, V. K., Gupta, A., & Verma, H. (2024). Goodbye materialism: Exploring antecedents of minimalism and its impact on millennials’ well-being. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 19779–19805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03437-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Jobya. (2023). The benefits of a minimalist approach to work-life balance. Jobya. https://jobya.com/learn/workplace/work_life_balance/the_benefits_of_a_minimalist_approach_to_wor k-life_balance [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Johnston, H., & Land-Kazlauskas, C. (2019). Organizing on-demand: Representation, voice, and collective bargaining in the gig economy (Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 94). ILO. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_protect/@protrav/@travail/documen ts/publication/wcms_624286.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Journal of Industrial Relations. (2024). The rise and contestation of platform capitalism: Evidence from two sectors in Malaysia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 66(2), 123–140. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385814213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Journal of Malaysian Legal Studies. (2021). Protecting gig workers' interests in Malaysia through registered association under Societies Act 1966. Journal of Malaysian Legal Studies, 15(1), 77–95. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360077610 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Katiyatiya, L. M., & Lubisi, N. (2024). The current social protection discourse, gig economy within the advent of COVID-19: Some emerging legal arguments. Labor History, 66(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/0023656X.2024.2340610 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Khazanah Research Institute. (2024). The state of households 2024: Households and the pandemic 2019–2022 [Executive summary]. https://www.krinstitute.org/assets/contentMS/img/template/editor/%5BWEBSITE%5D%20KRI%20SO H%202024%20EXECUTIVE%20SUMMARY.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Lane, M. (2020). Regulating platform work in the digital age. OECD Going Digital Toolkit Notes, No. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. https://doi.org/10.1787/181f8a7f-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Lang, J. J., Yang, L. F., Cheng, C., et al. (2023). Are algorithmically controlled gig workers deeply burned out? An empirical study on employee work engagement. BMC Psychology, 11, 354. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01402-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Makhtar, M., Abd Ghadas, Z. A., & Haque, M. (2023). Exploring legal protections for platform workers in Malaysia: A human rights-based perspective. Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, 11(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v11n2.a2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Makhtar, M., Abd Ghadas, Z. A., & Haque, M. (2022). Analysis of workers’ rights in the on-demand economy with special reference to vertical inequality. IIUM Law Journal. https://journals.iium.edu.my/iiumlj/index.php/iiumlj/article/download/701/338/2609 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. McCarthy. (2019). Uber, Lyft and DoorDash put $30m apiece into ballot battle fund to kill gig-economy employee benefits. The Register. https://www.theregister.com/2019/08/30/uber_lyft_ballot/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Md Radzi, M. S. N., Bidin, A., Musa, M. K., & Hamid, N. A. (2022). Protecting gig workers' interests in Malaysia through registered association under Societies Act 1966. IIUM Law Journal, 30(S1), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v30iS1.702 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Ministerio de Trabajo y Economía Social. (2021). Real Decreto-ley 9/2021, de 11 de mayo, por el que se modifica el texto refundido de la Ley del Estatuto de los Trabajadores. Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE). https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rdl/2021/05/11/9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Ministry of Manpower Singapore. (2022). Report of the Advisory Committee on Platform Workers. https://www.mom.gov.sg/-/media/mom/documents/press-releases/2022/strengthening-protections-for-pl atform-workers-report.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Mohamad Amin, N. S. (2023). Balancing the rights of gig economy workers in the context of collective bargaining. IIUM Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31i1.834 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Mohd Shakil, N. S. (2024). Gig economy in Malaysia: Current, present and future. Information Management and Business Review, 16(2(I)S), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i2(I)S.3769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Muldoon, J., & Raekstad, P. (2022). Algorithmic domination in the gig economy. European Journal of Political Theory, 22(4), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851221082078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Müller-Jentsch, W. (2018). Industrial democracy. International Journal of Political Economy, 25(3), 58–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08911916.1995.11643906 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. MyDIGITAL Corporation. (2024). What gig workers really want: Understanding gig workers’ work and welfare preferences in Malaysia [Whitepaper]. https://www.mydigital.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GigWorkerWhitepaper.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. O’Brien. (2020). Prop 22 passes in California, exempting Uber and Lyft from classifying drivers as employees. CNN Business. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/04/tech/california-proposition-22/index.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Oxford Department of Social Sciences. (2024). Improving working conditions for workers in the digital gig economy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. https://www.socsci.ox.ac.uk/improving-working-conditions-for-workers-in-the-digital-gig-economy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Perkeso. (2023). Self‑Employment Social Security Scheme (SESSS). https://www.perkeso.gov.my/uncategorised/51-social-security-protection/818-self-employment-social-s ecurity-scheme.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Pesole, A., Urzí Brancati, M. C., Fernández-Macías, E., Biagi, F., & González Vázquez, I. (2018). Platform workers in Europe: Evidence from the COLLEEM Survey. Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC112157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Rhinehart, L., McNicholas, C., Poydock, M., & Mangundayao, I. (2021, June 16). Misclassification, the ABC test, and employee status: The California experience and its relevance to current policy debates. Economic Policy Institute. https://files.epi.org/uploads/229045.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Rosenblatt (2019). Uber’s Future May Depend On Convincing the World Drivers Aren’t Part of its ‘Core Business’. TIME Magazine. https://time.com/5675637/uber-business-future/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. SOCSO. (2023). Self-Employment Social Security Scheme (SESSS) Annual Report 2023. https://www.perkeso.gov.my [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Sumagaysay (2024). Uber, Lyft, DoorDash workers remain contractors due to California Supreme Court ruling. Call Matters. https://calmatters.org/economy/2024/07/prop-22-california-gig-work-law-upheld/#:~:text=In%20a%20 major%20victory%20for,on%20Proposition%2022%20was%20unanimous. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Taylor, M., et. al. (2023). Physical and psychological hazards in the gig economy system: A systematic review. Safety Science, 163, 106234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Tribunal Supremo. (2020). Sentencia 805/2020 (Glovo ruling), Sala de lo Social. Summarized in El País. Retrieved from https://www.poderjudicial.es/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Uchiyama, Y. (2023, December 26). Exploited and unprotected: Life as a gig worker. 360info. Retrieved April 20, 2025, from https://360info.org/exploited-and-unprotected-life-as-a-gig-worker/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Uchiyama, Y., Furuoka, F., & Md. Akhir, M. N. (2022). Gig Workers, Social Protection and Labour Market Inequality: Lessons from Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 56(3), 165–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2022-5603-09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Walsh, B. (2020, April 14). How the gig economy can reduce unemployment and debt. MIT Sloan School of Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/how-gig-economy-can-reduce-unemployment-and-debt [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Warren, T. (2021). Work–life balance and gig work: ‘Where are we now’ and ‘where to next’ with the work–life balance agenda? Journal of Industrial Relations, 63(3), 334–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856211007161 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Wilson, J. (2024). Everything you need to know about gig economy workers. Croner. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. https://croner.co.uk/resources/contracts-documentation/what-to-know-about-gig-economy-workers/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.