Global Trends in School-Based Assessment: Implications for Effective Implementation in Sri Lanka
Authors
Lecturer, Department of Planning & Evaluation, National Institute of Education (Sri Lanka)
Senior Lecturer, Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Colombo (Sri Lanka)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0705
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/26 | Page No: 9286-9297
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-20
Accepted: 2025-11-25
Published: 2025-12-01
Abstract
This systematic review summarizes evidence on implementation, philosophical underpinnings, methodologies, and challenges of School Based Assessment (SBA) conducted in 12 countries including Finland, Canada, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Africa, the Caribbean, Australia, Malaysia, China, the United States, and Sri Lanka. Based on policy documents, empirical research, and academic publications, the review reveals that SBA has become a major international reform strategy that will empower student-centered learning, formative assessment, and holistic evaluation. The analysis divides SBA models based on the underlying philosophical orientations and shows that most of the Western systems are mostly constructivist and with learner-centered models, and most of Asian systems are standardized, centrally regulated models. Although the structures differ, SBA is largely known to support deep learning, intrinsic motivation, and meaningful engagement of learners. In the examined settings, multiple common obstacles limit efficacious implementation, such as the overload of workload on teachers, lack of assessment literacy, insufficient professional development, and ongoing issues with reliability and consistency. The comparison of 48 publications guided by PRISMA indicates the similarities in cross-national aspects as well as significant regional variations, which provides a strong foundation of evidence in the future of policy and practice. The review finds that permanent capacity-building of teachers, systematic moderation of teachers, and harmonious policy alignment are critical in ensuring equitable and effective implementation of SBA to maximize its role in fostering student-centered learning and quality education.
Keywords
School-Based Assessment, formative assessment, global educational reform, PRISMA-style approach
Downloads
References
1. Abayasekara, A., & Arunatilake, N. (2018). School-level resource allocation and education outcomes in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Educational Development, 61, 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.12.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Aturupane, H., & Little, A. W. (2019). General education in Sri Lanka. In Global education systems (pp. 1–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3309-5_18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2020). Assessment. https://www.acara.edu.au/assessment [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Brookhart, S. M. (2013). Classroom assessment in the context of motivation theory and research. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 35–54). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218649.n3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Chisholm, L., & Leyendecker, R. (2007). Curriculum reform in post-1990s sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.04.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Deneen, C. C., & Hoo, H. (2021). Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2002). Leading schools in a data-rich world. In A. Harris, C. Day, M. Hadfield, D. Hopkins, H. Hargreaves, & C. Chapman (Eds.), Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 1003–1022). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0375-9_34 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Edussuriya, D. H., Waduge, R. N., Lamawansa, M. D., & Samaranayake, A. N. (2018). Evaluation of the cognitive level of essay questions of an undergraduate medical program in Sri Lanka, using Bloom’s taxonomy. Sri Lanka Journal of Medicine, 27(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.4038/sljm.v27i1.72 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Evans, C. (2021). Enhancing assessment feedback practice in higher education: The EAT framework (Version 4). ERASMUS EAT Project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354822146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Fine, M., & Pryiomka, K. (2020). Assessing college readiness through authentic student work. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/assessing-college-readiness-authentic-student-work [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hapugoda, J. C., & Kulasekara, G. U. (2024). Harnessing the affective domain of learning taxonomy for value integration in online learning. International Conference on Learning, Virtual Education (ICLVE), 6(5), 138–145. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385825374 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Hipkins, R., Vaughan, K., & New Zealand Council for Educational Research. (2019). Subject choice for the future of work: Insights from research literature [Technical report]. New Zealand Council for Educational Research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338844264 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Issaka, N. J., Hammond, N. D. K., Yeyie, N. P., & Agroh, N. P. K. (2020). Benefits of School-Based Assessment in the learning of Social Studies. Social Education Research, 219–228. https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.122020458 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Klenowski, V. (2011). Assessment for learning in the accountability era: Queensland, Australia. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ministry of Education. (1998). Implementation of school-based assessment (Circular No. 1998/45). Ministry of Education, Sri Lanka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Ministry of Education. (2001). Revised guidelines on continuous assessment (Circular No. 2001/23). Ministry of Education, Sri Lanka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ministry of Education. (2003). Guidelines for implementing school-based assessment in Sri Lankan schools (Circular No. 2003/13). Ministry of Education, Sri Lanka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ministry of Education. (2017). Further instructions on school-based assessment implementation (Circular No. 2017/23). Ministry of Education, Sri Lanka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ministry of Education. (2020). Ministry of Education, Singapore. https://www.moe.gov.sg/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. National Education Commission. (2016). Proposals for a national policy on general education in Sri Lanka 2016 (ISBN 978-955-9448-50-1). https://nec.gov.lk/proposals-for-a-national-policy-on-general-education-in-sri-lanka-2016/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. National Examination and School Inspection Authority. (2023, February). National subject assessment standards for the end of term II, 2022–2023 school year. https://www.nesa.gov.rw/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=119472&token=845692efd00449490f7cbab47e15b0970e9ffc2b [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. New Zealand Qualifications Authority. (2023, November 7). Spotlight 4: Innovative internal assessment case studies. https://www2.nzqa.govt.nz/ncea/ncea-for-teachers-and-schools/spotlight-videos/spotlight-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. OECD, Pont, B., Musset, P., Istance, D., Vincent-Lancrin, S., Van Damme, D., Weatherby, K., Achiron, M., Del Bourgo, E., Tessier, R., & Villoutreix, E. (2013). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world (A. Schleicher, Ed.). OECD Publishing. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533757.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2010). Growing success: Assessment, evaluation, and reporting in Ontario schools. Ontario Ministry of Education. https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/policyfunding/growsuccess.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Perera, G. G. P. S., Bandara, A., & Ekanayake, S. Y. (2020). Study of the existing status of school-based assessment system in upper school chemistry of Sri Lanka. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i10.3341 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Sachith, E. M. Y., & Niroshinie, R. D. C. (2025). An investigation of the nature of the school-based assessment (SBA) programme implemented in junior secondary (Grades 6–9) classes in Sri Lanka. Rajasthan Association for Studies on English, 19(Special Issue), 1–15. ISSN 0975-3419 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Sahlberg, P. (2011). Paradoxes of educational improvement: The Finnish experience. Scottish Educational Review, 43(1), 3–23. https://pasisahlberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Paradoxes-of-improvement-SER-2011.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Sayed, Y., Kanjee, A., & Nkomo, M. (2013). The search for quality education in post-apartheid South Africa: Interventions to improve learning and teaching. HSRC Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Senarath, S. (2020). Examination stress, stress management strategies, and counseling needs of college level students in Sri Lanka. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, 8(2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.15640/jpbs.v8n2a3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Tan, C., & Hairon, S. (2016). Education reform in China: Toward classroom communities. Action in Teacher Education, 38(4), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2016.1226205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Tong, S. Y. A., & Adamson, B. (2015). Student voices in school-based assessment. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n2.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. UNESCO. (2022). Sri Lanka – National consultation report (Transforming education). UNESCO Office Bangkok. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Weerakoon, D. (2025). Unmasking exam pressure: Reimagining Sri Lanka’s education for a brighter future. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389813024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Zakaria, N., Lim, G. F., Jalil, N. A., Anuar, N. N. A. N., & Aziz, A. A. (2024). The implementation of personalised learning to teach English in Malaysian low-enrolment schools. SHS Web of Conferences, 182, 01011. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418201011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study