Government Policy on the Phenomenon of Online Gambling in Indonesia: An Integrative Analysis of Law, Technology, and Siyasah Syar'iyyah

The phenomenon of online gambling has grown rapidly as a form of digital crime that is adaptive to the weaknesses of the state's surveillance system. This study aims to analyze online gambling practices in Makassar City, Indonesia, with a focus on operational patterns, the effectiveness of government legal policies, and normative legitimacy from the perspective of siyasah syar'iyyah. The research approach is qualitative and descriptive, combining empirical juridical and normative analysis of Sharia. Primary data were obtained through field observation and in-depth interviews. Secondary data are sourced from laws and regulations, and scientific articles related to the research theme. The results of the study show that online gambling practices in Makassar City are dominated by slot games, poker, and lotteries accessed through social media, messaging applications, and Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). Transaction patterns utilize e-wallets and anonymous accounts, making it difficult to track the law. The government has carried out site blocking, site raids, and digital socialization, but its effectiveness is limited due to the limitations of digital forensics and weak cross-agency coordination. Religious institutions began to play a role in moral campaigns, but they were still sporadic. These structural barriers are even more contrasting when compared to the multi-level strategy of East Asian countries that combine artificial intelligence (AI) technology, cross-border financial cooperation, and national digital literacy. The implications of this study emphasize the need to shift the paradigm of online gambling prevention from a repressive approach to an integrative adaptive model that combines law, technology, institutions, and religious values. Strategic recommendations include strengthening AI-based domain monitoring, increasing digital forensic capacity, integrating policies across sectors, and optimizing the role of communities and religious institutions in prevention. This research contributes to the development of a national policy framework in the face of the increasingly complex challenges of online gambling.

Law; Online gambling; digital crime; public policy; siyasah syar'iyyah

1. Al-Faruqi, I. (2019). Islamic legal methodology in contemporary governance. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Faruqi, I. (2019). Maysir and its socio-economic implications in Islamic law. Islamic Studies Review, 12(1), 33–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Qaradawi, Y. (2018). Siyasah Syar'iyyah and public welfare. Cairo: Dar al-Shuruq. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aulia, R., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Legal gaps in Indonesia's cyber gambling law enforcement. Journal of Law and Digital Policy, 15(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, L. (2020). Regulatory responses to online gambling in East Asia. Asian Cyber Policy Journal, 8(4), 121–139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Clarke, R. V., & Felson, M. (2017). Routine activity and crime prevention. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Griffiths, M., & Nuyens, F. (2017). Online gaming design and addiction. Cyberpsychology Journal, 9(2), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hidayat, M. (2021). Digital literacy and online gambling prevention. Journal of Islamic Communication, 9(3), 201–219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. London: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kim, S. (2021). The evolution of online gambling platforms. Journal of Cyber Law, 7(1), 75–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kim, S. (2021). The evolution of online gambling platforms. Journal of Cyber Law, 7(1), 75–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lee, J. (2018). Gambling exposure among young adults in Asia. Social Issues Review, 14(2), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Liu, M. (2022). Financial flows in illegal online gambling. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(1), 144–162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nguyen, T., & Lee, S. (2020). Internet gambling trends in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Cyber Studies, 5(3), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nugraha, Y., Hidayat, M., & Yusuf, A. (2023). Faith-based prevention in digital society. Indonesian Journal of Digital Religion, 4(1), 12–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Park, J., Tan, C., & Goh, B. (2022). Multi-agency coordination in online gambling enforcement. Journal of Asian Security, 10(1), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pranata, B. (2023). Adaptive networks in online gambling. Digital Criminology, 6(2), 77–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Prasetyo, A., Nugroho, D., & Setiawan, B. (2022). AI-driven domain blocking system. Indonesian Journal of Cyber Policy, 5(4), 301–320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rahman, A. (2022). The socio-economic burden of online gambling. Global Public Policy Journal, 19(2), 100–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rahmawati, N., & Yusuf, M. (2022). Online gambling vulnerability among Indonesian youth. Youth and Society, 12(3), 221–238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Santoso, A. (2021). Legal enforcement and online gambling in Indonesia. Indonesian Law Journal, 9(1), 65–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Setiawan, B. (2021). Financial tracing of illegal online transactions. Finance and Crime Studies, 3(2), 177–192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Smith, J., & Dean, R. (2021). Integrating Islamic legal theory in modern governance research. Journal of Islamic Law Studies, 13(2), 85–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tan, K., & Goh, C. (2020). Digital forensics capacity in Southeast Asia. Cybercrime Review, 6(2), 98–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wang, Y., & Lim, H. (2019). Multi-level policy responses to online gambling. Asian Public Policy, 7(1), 15–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.