Harnessing Future Economic Benefits Through Acquisition Adaptation: A Conceptual Model of Intangible Asset Formation

In today’s knowledge-driven economy, intangible assets have become key determinants of organizational competitiveness. However, the process by which potential value is transformed into sustainable intangible resources remains conceptually fragmented, particularly regarding the mediating role of acquisition adaptation. Limited theoretical and empirical attention to this construct has left firms uncertain about how to leverage acquisitions beyond financial consolidation to create enduring strategic value. This study aims to establish a robust theoretical foundation that explains how acquisition processes can be optimized to harness future economic benefits and promote intangible asset formation. Employing a narrative review methodology across both the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases, this study utilizes a structured search strategy and integrative thematic analysis to synthesize literature across management, accounting, and innovation disciplines.The findings reveal that intangible asset formation occurs as a multi-stage process encompassing the identification of potential economic benefits, the adaptive integration of acquired resources, and the systematic measurement and disclosure of resulting intangible capital. Acquisition adaptation emerges as a critical mediating mechanism that transforms abstract economic potential into tangible organizational value, as demonstrated by qualitative case studies across industries such as pharmaceuticals, telecommunications, consumer goods, and finance. These cases illustrate how knowledge transfer, cultural alignment, and digital integration practices enable firms to realize the future economic benefits envisioned at the acquisition stage. Theoretically, this study extends the resource-based view (RBV) by positioning acquisition adaptation at the core of intangible asset development, integrating insights from both Scopus and WoS to ensure comprehensive theoretical coverage. Practically, it provides managers with a cross-industry framework for evaluating acquisitions as strategic pathways for developing intellectual, human, and relational capital. The study concludes by recommending empirical validation through longitudinal case studies, encouraging future research to operationalize acquisition adaptation as a measurable construct for sustainable competitive advantage.

Future Economic Benefits, Acquisition Adaptation, Intangible Asset Formation

1. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bagna, E., Rossi, F., & Zanetti, L. (2024). Intangible assets and firm performance: The relative effects. Journal of Business Research, 165, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.113456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Boj, J. J., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R., & Alfaro-Saiz, J. J. (2014). An ANP-multi-criteria-based methodology to link intangible assets and organizational performance in a balanced scorecard context. Decision Support Systems, 68(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.10.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chareonsuk, C., & Chansa-Ngavej, C. (2008). Intangible asset management framework for long-term financial performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(6), 812–828. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810884020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cosmulese, C. G., Socoliuc, M., Ciubotariu, M. S., & Mateş, D. (2021). Empirical study on the impact of evaluation of intangible assets on the market value of listed companies. E a M: Ekonomie a Management, 24(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2021-2-005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dong, F. (2024). The role of intangible assets in shaping firm value. European Financial Management, 30(2), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Egorov, M. V., Soltan, K. D., Egorova, E. M., & Egorova, L. I. (2018). Economic strategies of innovative development of intangible assets of Russian exporters. *European Research Studies Journal, 21*(1), 433–444. [https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/985](https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/985) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Elkemali, T., Ahmed, M., & Bensaid, R. (2024). Intangible and tangible investments and future earnings volatility. Economics, 12(3), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12030055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Grant Thornton. (2013). Intangible assets in a business combination. Grant Thornton International Ltd. https://www.grantthornton.global/globalassets/1.-member-firms/global/ifrs/ifrs-alerts/ifrs_alert_intangibles.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., & Malterud, K. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 48(6), e12931. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Green, A., & Ryan, J. J. (2005). A framework of intangible valuation areas (FIVA) aligning business strategy and intangible assets. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(1), 43-52.https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930510574611 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Grimaldi, M., & Cricelli, L. (2009). Intangible asset contribution to company performance: The “hierarchical assessment index.” VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 39(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055720910934963 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hussinki, H. (2024). Accounting for intangibles: A critical review. Journal of Accounting Literature, 53(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-2024-0007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ipate, D. M., & Pârvu, I. (2009). Management valuation as an intangible asset. *UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series D: Mechanical Engineering, 71*(2), 123–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jackson, S. E. (2008). Strategic opportunism. Journal of Business Strategy, 29(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660810845680 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kartsan, I., Zhukov, A., & Pronichkin, S. (2023). Multicriteria models for structural analysis of human capital reproduction strategies of knowledge-intensive enterprises in the context of digitalization. E3S Web of Conferences, 403(2), 02012. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340302012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kumar, N., & Gupta, S. T. (2025). Integrating technology across sectors: Innovations in public administration, engineering, and business. In *Digital Technologies and Transformations in Public Administration, Engineering, and Sustainable Business* (pp. 1–18). Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52165-9_1](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52165-9_1) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Li, S. (2021). The misunderstanding of business management innovation in the digital economy era: Excess merger and corporate innovation. E3S Web of Conferences, 275(2), 02011. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127502011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lopes, F. C., & Carvalho, L. (2021). Intangible assets and business performance in Latin America. RAUSP Management Journal, 56(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-09-2019-0192 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ma, S. (2023). How to improve IFRS for intangible assets? A milestone. Journal of International Accounting Research, 22(4), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2023-012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Montané Marsal, N., & Cuesta Santos, A. (2023). Psychosocial intangible assets and their effect on the organizational performance of sustainable banking. Universidad y Sociedad, 15(4), 336–345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Năstase, G. I., & Badea, C. G. W. (2015). Theoretical aspects regarding the intangible assets. *Quality – Access to Success, 16*(148), 79–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nichita, M. (2019). Intangible assets – Insights from a literature review. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3375281 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ogbo, N. B., & Han, T. A. (2024). Coordination dynamics in technology adoption: Lessons from an evolutionary game theoretical analysis. *Multisector Insights in Healthcare, Social Sciences, Society, and Technology, 2*(1), 1–12. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msihsst.2024.100015](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msihsst.2024.100015) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Park, S. O. (2015). Interaction of corporate and urban systems: Accumulation of intangible assets. *Urban Geography, 36*(3), 391–407. [https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2014.985554](https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2014.985554) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Šiška, L. (2013). Intangible factors of company’s performance. In IDIMT 2013 – Information Technology Human Values, Innovation and Economy (pp. 433–440). Trauner Verlag. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Smit, H. T. J., & Moraitis, T. (2010). Serial acquisition options. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.09.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Zhou, Q., & Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K. (2012). Uncertainty assessment of climate change adaptation options in urban flash floods. In *WSUD 2012 – 7th International Conference on Water Sensitive Urban Design* (pp. 1–9). Engineers Australia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Correlation of Marketing Strategies and Financial Performance of Motor Parts Businesses in the City of Mati
• The Role of Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts in Enhancing Financial Transparency and Efficiency in the Emerging Market
• Exploring Intention among Universiti Teknologi Mara Terengganu Community to Donate into Education Waqf Fund
• Utilizing AHP Method to Rank Preference of Waqf Fund Usage for UiTM Terengganu, Malaysia
• The Influence of Portfolio Diversification on Financial Performance: Evidence from Listed Banks on the Ghana Stock Exchange