Homologous Structures: A Reappraisal of Evolutionary Interpretation

Authors

Huzefa Jivanjee

Aljamea-tus-Saifiyah, Nairobi (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000703

Subject Category: Theology

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 8637-8642

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-02

Accepted: 2025-11-10

Published: 2025-11-21

Abstract

This paper explores homologous structures as a point of dialogue between evolutionary biology and Islamic thought. While evolution interprets these similarities as evidence of common ancestry, Islamic perspective views them as signs of Divine unity and wisdom. Drawing on the works of Darwin, Paley and Rasail Ikhwan al-Safa, the paper puts homology within the context of epistemological pluralism. It proposes that science and faith, when approached holistically, are not in conflict but rather offer harmonising insights into creation.

Keywords

Evolution, epistemological pluralism, Rasail Ikhwan al-Safa

Downloads

References

1. Aljamea-tus-Saifiyah, Reflections – 2nd Moharram al-Haram 1447 H [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ayala, F. J. (2013). Darwin’s gift to science and religion. John Henry Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Behe, M. J. (1996). Darwin’s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Carroll, R. L. (1997). Patterns and processes of vertebrate evolution. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Carroll, S. B. (1997). Endless forms most beautiful: The new science of evo devo and the making of the animal kingdom. W. W. Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chalmers, A. F. (2013). What is this thing called science? (4th ed.). Open University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Darwin, C. (1859/2009). On the origin of species (J. Burrow, Ed.). Penguin Classics. (Original work published in 1859) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. W. W. Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hall, B. K. (2007). Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hooke, R. (1665/2013). Micrographia. Courier Corporation. (Original work published 1665) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Imam Ahmed al-Mastur SA, Rasail Ikhwan al-Safa, Risalat Ajnaas al-Nabaat, Pg 152, Dar Sader [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Imam Ahmed al-Mastur SA, Rasail Ikhwan al-Safa, Risalat fi kaifiyat takween al-haiwanaat wa asnafaha, Pg 192, Dar Sader [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. McIntyre, L. (2019). The scientific attitude: Defending science from denial, fraud, and pseudoscience. MIT Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Paley, W. (1802/2006). Natural theology: Or, evidences of the existence and attributes of the deity collected from the appearances of nature. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1802) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Reid, G. M. (2009). Carolous Linnaeus: His Life, Philosophy and Science and Its Relationship to Modern Biology and Medicine. Wiley, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. von Baer, K. E. (1956). On the development of animals: Observations and reflections (O. Hertwig, Ed.). MIT Press. (Original work published 1828) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zimmer, C., & Emlen, D. J. (2016). Evolution: Making sense of life (2nd ed.). W. H. Freeman and Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles