Impact of Renewable Energy Indicators on Sustainable Development in Nigeria
Authors
Emerald Energy Institute, University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria)
Emerald Energy Institute, University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria)
Emerald Energy Institute, University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.915EC00765
Subject Category: Economics
Volume/Issue: 9/15 | Page No: 1498-1513
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-02
Accepted: 2025-11-10
Published: 2025-11-22
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of renewable energy indicators on sustainable development in Nigeria over the period 1990 to 2024. The main objective was to examine how solar energy consumption, total biomass consumption, and hydroelectric production influenced sustainable development as measured by the Human Development Index. The motivation for the study was rooted in Nigeria’s persistent energy challenges, its growing reliance on renewable sources, and the urgent need to understand how these transitions translate into human development outcomes. The methodology combined descriptive statistics, unit root tests, bounds testing for cointegration, and the Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag model to analyze both short-run and long-run dynamics. The statistical techniques ensured that the relationships were rigorously examined despite the mix of integration orders among the variables. The findings revealed three distinct outcomes. First, total biomass consumption had a positive but statistically insignificant effect on human development, implying that its dominant traditional use limited its developmental contribution. Second, solar energy consumption had a negative and significant effect, suggesting that despite its rapid growth, structural and institutional challenges such as high costs, weak policy frameworks, and poor integration constrained its ability to improve welfare outcomes. Third, hydroelectric production had a positive and significant effect, confirming its role as the most stable and impactful renewable source for long-term improvements in education, health, and income levels. The error correction mechanism further confirmed a strong speed of adjustment, indicating that the system quickly returned to equilibrium after short-term shocks. The study recommended that the Federal Ministry of Environment and the Energy Commission of Nigeria should lead efforts to modernize biomass through clean technologies. The Rural Electrification Agency and the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission should strengthen financing and grid integration to enhance solar’s developmental impact, while the Federal Ministry of Power and the Transmission Company of Nigeria should prioritize the expansion and climate resilience of hydroelectric infrastructure. Collectively, these actions were necessary to maximize the developmental benefits of renewable energy in Nigeria.
Keywords
Renewable energy, solar energy consumption, biomass consumption
Downloads
References
1. Abdolmaleki, S. F., & Bugallo, P. M. B. (2024). Advancing sustainability assessment of renewable energy: A study on indicator-to-framework methods and associated rule mining. Sustainable Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Aboul-Atta, T. A.-L., & Rashed, R. H. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between sustainable development indicators and renewable energy consumption. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 68(45). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Agbakwuru, V., Obidi, P. O., Salihu, O. S., & MaryJane, O. C. (2024). The role of renewable energy in achieving sustainable development goals. International Journal of Engineering Research Updates, 7(2), 13–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ahmed, A., & Dangana, M. G. (2022). Hydropower generation and its implications for energy security in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Energy and Power Systems, 9(1), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Akintunde, O. A., & Bello, K. T. (2023). Solar energy uptake and decentralized electrification in rural Nigeria. Renewable Energy Policy Review, 11(2), 101–117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bakare, T. M., & Hassan, S. O. (2022). Human Development Index as a measure of sustainable development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Development Studies, 15(2), 98–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Candra, O., Chammam, A., Nuñez Alvarez, J. R., Muda, I., & Aybar, H. Ş. (2023). The impact of renewable energy sources on the sustainable development of the economy and greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainability, 15(3), 2104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Chuong, H. N., Uyen, V. T. P., Ngan, N. D. P., Tram, N. T. B., Han, N. D. M., & Duyen, P. H. K. (2025). The impact of globalization, renewable energy, and labor on sustainable development: A cross-country analysis. PLOS ONE, 20(2), e0315273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Eboh, E. C., Okafor, I. C., & Nwachukwu, C. (2022). Renewable energy indicators and sustainable development pathways in Africa. Journal of Energy Economics and Environment, 8(3), 75–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves. (2024). Nigeria clean cooking sector assessment 2023. GACC Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Gomez, R. J., & Ramirez, C. L. (2022). Renewable energy and human development in Brazil: An ARDL approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 159, 112183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hai, N. C., Chuong, H. N., Duyen, P. M., & Van Trung, T. (2023). Determinants of the success level of economic growth. In A. T. Nguyen, T. T. Pham, J. Song, Y. L. Lin, & M. C. Dong (Eds.), Contemporary economic issues in Asian countries: Proceedings of CEIAC 2022 (Vol. 2, pp. 467–487). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. International Energy Agency. (2024). Bioenergy roadmap for Nigeria: Sustainable development pathways 2023. IEA Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. International Renewable Energy Agency. (2023). Renewable capacity statistics 2023. IRENA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Mol, A. P. J., & Jänicke, M. (2022). Ecological modernization theory and the global environmental debate. Environmental Politics, 31(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Mol, A. P. J., & Sonnenfeld, D. A. (2023). Ecological modernization around the world: Perspectives and critical debates. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Musa, B. I., & Ojo, A. K. (2023). The multidimensionality of sustainable development: A conceptual review. African Journal of Development and Governance, 11(3), 74–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission. (2024). Renewable energy database 2023. NERC Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Nwachukwu, M. O., & Uzochukwu, U. G. (2023). Biomass energy and sustainable cooking in Nigeria: A case for clean technology transitions. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Policy, 12(1), 56–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Obeng-Darko, N., & Aboagye, K. K. (2023). Conceptualizing renewable energy indicators for sustainable transitions in Africa. African Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 10(2), 121–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Olatunji, A. Y., Akande, M. A., & Bello, K. S. (2024). Human development and environmental sustainability in West Africa: A data-driven perspective. West African Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(1), 33–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Pata, U. K., Erdogan, S., & Ozcan, B. (2023). Evaluating the role of the share and intensity of renewable energy for sustainable development in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production, 421, 138482. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Rural Electrification Agency. (2024). Solar power deployment statistics 2000–2023. REA Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Saud, S., Haseeb, A., Haider Zaidi, S. A., Khan, I., & Li, H. (2024). Moving towards green growth, harnessing natural resources and economic complexity for sustainable development through the lens of the N shaped EKC framework for the European Union. Resources Policy, 91, 104804. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Saud, S., Haseeb, A., Zafar, M. W., & Li, H. (2023). Articulating natural resource abundance, economic complexity, education and environmental sustainability in MENA countries: Evidence from advanced panel estimation. Resources Policy, 80, 103261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Sztumski, W. (2023). Sustainable development, globalization, non-antagonistic development, philosophical environmentalism and endangered democracy. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 18(1), 28–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Human development data center. http://hdr.undp.org/en/data [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. World Bank. (2024). World development indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. York, R., & Rosa, E. A. (2023). The inefficacy of technological solutions for sustainability: Critiques of ecological modernization. Society & Natural Resources, 36(2), 133–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
- Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
- Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
- Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
- Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria