Impediments and Policy Gaps in Education Governance, Resource Allocation, and Stakeholder Engagement in Mauritius
Authors
Department of Social Science, Arts and Humanities, Lincoln University College (Malaysia)
Faculty of Social Science, Arts and Humanities, Lincoln University College (Malaysia)
Department of Sociology, Criminology and Security Studies, Thomas Adewumi University, Oko, Kwara State (Nigeria)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-18
Accepted: 2025-11-27
Published: 2025-12-05
Abstract
This study examines the challenges and policy gaps in Mauritius's stakeholder engagement, resource allocation, and education governance. It is based on Institutional Theory and explores how the normative, cognitive, and regulative pillars influence institutional behavior and lead to systemic inertia in the educational system. Using a mixed-methods design, the study combines qualitative and quantitative techniques. Two hundred participants, including administrators, educators, civil society representatives, and policymakers, were purposefully and stratified sampled to provide data. Thematic analysis of qualitative data was employed alongside statistical analyses such as regression, correlation, and structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the connections between governance, resource allocation, stakeholder engagement, and policy effectiveness. Results show that the key variables are strongly positively interrelated (R = 0.742; R² = 0.551; p < 0.001), and that the implementation of education policies is significantly affected by governance (β = 0.364), resource allocation (β = 0.315), stakeholder engagement (β = 0.287), and policy consistency (β = 0.243). Transparency, accountability, and equity enhance educational outcomes, while corruption and inconsistent policies hinder progress, according to SEM results (CFI = 0.958; RMSEA = 0.062), which confirm the model’s validity. The study concludes that, to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4), Mauritius needs equitable funding, participatory engagement, and effective governance reforms. It recommends long-term policy coherence, decentralized budgeting, stakeholder empowerment, and institutional accountability mechanisms to promote sustainable educational development.
Keywords
Mauritius, Institutional Theory, Stakeholder Engagement
Downloads
References
1. Adebayo, T., & Pillay, S. (2021). Governance and education policy reforms in small island states: Lessons from Africa and the Indian Ocean. International Journal of Educational Development, 87, 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. African Development Bank. (2021). Public expenditure review: Education sector in Mauritius. AfDB Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. African Development Bank. (2022). Education sector analysis in small island developing states: Governance and inclusivity challenges. AfDB Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. African Development Bank. (2023). Education and human capital development in Africa: Governance challenges and reform pathways. AfDB Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bissoondoyal, P. (2020). Educational reforms and governance challenges in Mauritius. University of Mauritius Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Burns, T., & Köster, F. (2016). Governing education in a complex world. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Lansang, R. (2021). Participatory governance in education: Lessons from small island developing states. Commonwealth Secretariat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalised organisations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. OECD. (2021). Education policy outlook. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). Education policy outlook: Trends shaping education governance. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Education policy outlook: Shaping responsive and resilient education systems. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Education policy outlook: Shaping responsive and resilient education in a changing world. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Education policy outlook: Trends and reforms. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Rajah-Carrim, A., & Bunwaree, S. (2021). Educational governance and policy coherence in small island developing states. University of Mauritius Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Ramdoyal, R., & Mungur, A. (2021). Educational development and governance reforms in Mauritius. Journal of Education Policy and Practice, 14(2), 55–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ramtohul, R. (2021). Education reform and participatory governance in Mauritius. Journal of Indian Ocean Studies, 29(2), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Saito, H. (2023). Adaptive governance and educational transformation in small island states. Comparative Education Review, 67(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1086/724765 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organisations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Subramanian, R., & Bunwaree, S. (2020). Education policy and governance in Mauritius: Inclusion, equity, and accountability. Comparative Education Review, 64(4), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1086/709939 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Transparency International. (2023). Corruption Perceptions Report. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022: Inclusion and education. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Investing in education systems. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. UNICEF. (2022). Education sector analysis: Mauritius country profile. United Nations Children’s Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2024). Human development report 2024: Advancing equity in education and governance. UNDP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. World Bank. (2020). Mauritius: Education sector analysis – Building a resilient education system. World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. World Bank. (2021). Mauritius education sector analysis: Addressing equity and efficiency in education financing. World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. World Bank. (2022). Mauritius education sector analysis: Building inclusive and equitable education systems. World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. World Bank. (2023). Mauritius education sector public expenditure review. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study