Internalizing ESG: Validating Psychological Drivers as Leading Non-Financial Indicators (NFIs) In University Sustainability

This study addresses a critical accountability gap in contemporary sustainability reporting by empirically examining the internal psychological factors that can serve as reliable leading Non-Financial Indicators (NFIs) for predicting Pro-Environmental Behaviour (PEB). Currently, institutional sustainability practices suffer from an over-reliance on lagging, retrospective output indicators that inherently fail to provide the predictive, timely, and actionable insights crucial for effective institutional governance and proactive policy intervention. Therefore, this research empirically validates whether internal psychological elements, categorised as normative, value-based, and cognitive drivers, can serve as reliable leading NFIs for PEB among students in Higher Learning Institutions (HLIs) in Malaysia. A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted, collecting data from 338 university students using stratified sampling. The analysis employed Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), and the results revealed a critical dual challenge for behavioural governance. Personal Norms emerged as the most significant positive driver of PEB, confirming that intrinsic moral commitment is the primary control mechanism. Conversely, Social Norms exhibited a significant negative influence, indicating that PEB is currently perceived as a cultural barrier or outlier behaviour subject to peer disapproval. Other measured drivers, including General Values, Attitude toward PEB, and Environmental Awareness, were found to be statistically weak or insignificant predictors. This research provides a crucial methodological contribution by substantiating these internal psychological elements as measurable, forward-looking NFIs. The findings recommend a strategic shift for HLIs, prioritising high-impact Moral Reinforcement interventions to strengthen Personal Norms over traditionally ineffective, awareness-based campaigns. The study’s core proposition is the formal inclusion of validated NFIs into governance dashboards, thereby enhancing the credibility and predictive capability of sustainability and ESG performance reporting. Furthermore, this study offers valuable insights for policymakers seeking to operationalise behavioural indicators within broader environmental governance systems.

Non-Financial Indicators, Pro-Environmental Behaviour

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almencion, S. J., Otagan, R. J., Tingal, J. L., & Davin, J. M. (2024). Environmental education and pro-environmental behaviour among UM Peñaplata college students (Doctoral dissertation). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033 2909.103.3.411 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arya, B., & Kumar, H. (2023). Value behaviour norm theory approach to predict private sphere pro-environmental behaviour among university students. Rigas Tehniskas Universitates Zinatniskie Raksti, 27(1), 164-176. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bai, G., & Bai, Y. (2020). Voluntary or forced: different effects of personal and social norms on urban residents’ environmental protection behaviour. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3525. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Balundė, D., Juškevičienė, A., & Juškevičius, R. (2020). Factors influencing pro-environmental behaviour among young people. Rural Economy and Culture, 16(2), 7-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Barr, S. (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviours: A UK case study of household waste management. Environment and behaviour, 39(4), 435-473. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Blok, V., Wesselink, R., Studynka, O., & Kemp, R. (2015). Encouraging sustainability in the workplace: A survey on the pro-environmental behaviour of university employees. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 55-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cedrún-Vázquez, E., Núñez-Ríos, J. E., Sánchez-García, J. Y., Sosa-Gómez, G., & Rojas, O. (2025). Structural Equation Modeling for Analyzing Pro-Environmental Behaviour in Switzerland. Sustainability, 17(8), 3624. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chen, T. B., & Chai, L. T. (2010). Attitude towards the environment and green products: consumers' perspective. Management science and engineering, 4(2), 27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chen, M. F., & Tung, P. J. (2014). Developing an extended theory of planned behaviour model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. International journal of hospitality management, 36, 221-230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chiang, Y.-T., Fang, W.-T., Kaplan, U., & Ng, E. (2019). Locus of control: The mediation effect between emotional stability and pro-environmental behaviour. Sustainability (Switzerland). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Colombo, S. L., Chiarella, S. G., Lefrançois, C., Fradin, J., Raffone, A., & Simione, L. (2023). Why knowing about climate change is not enough to change: A perspective paper on the factors explaining the environmental knowledge-action gap. Sustainability, 15(20), 14859. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dolnicar, S., Hurlimann, A., & Grün, B. (2012). Water conservation behaviour in Australia. Journal of environmental management, 105, 44-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Domingues, R. B., & Gonçalves, G. (2020). Assessing environmental attitudes in Portugal using a new short version of the Environmental Attitudes Inventory. A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 39, 629–639. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ebrahimi, M., Zeidi, I. ., Maleki, M. R., & Zeidi, B. . (2024). Explaining the Psychological Variables Effective on Pro-Environmental Behaviour in the Elementary School Students at Qazvin City: Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Pajouhan Scientific Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2831–2857. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Empidi, A. V. A., & Emang, D. (2021). Understanding public intentions to participate in protection initiatives for forested watershed areas using the theory of planned behaviour: a case study of Cameron Highlands in Pahang, Malaysia. Sustainability, 13(8), 4399. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fielding, K. S., Head, B. W., Laffan, W., Western, M., & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (2012). Australian politicians’ beliefs about climate change: political partisanship and political ideology. Environmental Politics, 21(5), 712-733. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ganapathy, M. (2016). Transformation of Malaysia’s higher education system: Malaysia Education Blueprint (2015-2025). Bulletin of Higher Education Research, 5(1), 10-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of consumer Research, 35(3), 472-482. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hamann, K. R. S., Reese, G., Seewald, D., & Loeschinger, D. C. (2015). Affixing the theory of normative conduct (to your mailbox): Injunctive and descriptive norms as predictors of anti-ads sticker use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Handoyo, B., Astina, I. K., & Mkumbachi, R. L. (2021, March). Students’ environmental awareness and pro-environmental behaviour: preliminary study of geography students at state university of malang. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 683, No. 1, p. 012049). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hair, J. F. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hair, J. F., Astrachan, C. B., Moisescu, O. I., Radomir, L., Sarstedt, M., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(3), 100392. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Helferich, M., Thøgersen, J., & Bergquist, M. (2023). Direct and mediated impacts of social norms on pro-environmental behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 80, 102680. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hidalgo-Crespo, J., Velastegui-Montoya, A., Amaya-Rivas, J. L., & Riel, A. (2023). The Role of Personality in the Adoption of Pro-Environmental Behaviours through the Lens of the Value-Belief-Norm Theory. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(17). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hua, Y., & Mi, J. (2025). Can pro-environmental behaviour in the private sphere drive such behaviour in the public domain? Behavioural feedback mechanisms based on the Chinese General Social Survey. Cities, 165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Janmaimool, P., & Khajohnmanee, S. (2019). Roles of environmental system knowledge in promoting university students’ environmental attitudes and pro-environmental behaviours. Sustainability, 11(16), 4270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic management review, 3(1-2), 128-143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Kácha, O., & Ruggeri, K. (2019). Nudging intrinsic motivation in environmental risk and social policy. Journal of Risk Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kácha, O., & van der Linden, S. (2021). The moderating role of moral norms and personal cost in compliance with pro-environmental social norms. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 2, 100020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Kim, S. H., & Seock, Y.-K. (2019). The roles of values and social norm on personal norms and pro-environmentally friendly apparel product purchasing behaviour: The mediating role of personal norms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Koessler A-K, Vorlaufer T, Fiebelkorn F (2022). Social norms and climate-friendly behaviour of adolescents. PLoS ONE 17(4): e0266847. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental education research, 8(3), 239-260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Ly, B. (2024). Understanding pro-environmental behaviour: the effects of social influence and environmental awareness in Cambodian context. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 14, 710–719. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package—Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(3), 287–300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Md. Akhir, N., Wei Lun, A., Mee Yeang, C., Abd Rahman, N., & Halim, L. (2022). Establishing the value-psychological-educational dimensions for “learning to action” model for pro-environmental behaviour. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2156748 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Mkumbachi, R. L., Astina, I. K., & Handoyo, B. (2024). Environmental awareness and pro-environmental behaviour: A case of university students in Malang city. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi: Kajian, Teori, dan Praktek dalam Bidang Pendidikan dan Ilmu Geografi, 25(2), 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Nkaizirwa, J. ., Nsanganwimana, F., & Aurah, C. M. (2022). On the predictors of pro-environmental behaviours: integrating personal values and the 2-MEV among secondary school students in Tanzania. Heliyon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Papaspyropoulos, K. G., & Karamanolis, D. (2016). Drivers and barriers of sustainability reporting in the Greek public forest service. Open Journal of Accounting, 5(03), 35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Parker, L., & Prabawa-Sear, K. (2020). Environmental education in Indonesia: creating responsible citizens in the global south? (p. 280). Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Poškus, M. S. (2000). An Evolutionary Approach Toward Pro-Environmental Behaviour. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 7, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Prakash, G., & Pathak, P. (2017). Intention to buy eco-friendly packaged products among young consumers of India: A study on developing nation. Journal of cleaner production, 141, 385-393. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Prasetyo, Y. T., Kurata, Y. B., Zahra, K., Cahigas, M. M. L., Nadlifatin, R., & Gumasing, M. J. J. (2024). Factors affecting compliance with vehicular environmental laws and pro-environmental behaviour in Lahore, Pakistan. Acta Psychologica, 251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Ramayah, T. Y. J. A., Yeap, J. A., & Ignatius, J. (2013). An empirical inquiry on knowledge sharing among academicians in higher learning institutions. Minerva, 51(2), 131-154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Ren, M., Fan, W., Yang, L., & Zhong, Y. (2025). Navigating Nested Social Dilemmas: The Impact of Social Norms on Pro-Environmental Behaviour. International Journal of Psychology, 60(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Ringle, C. M. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3). http://www. smartpls. de. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franěk, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behaviour. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275962 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Sewak, A., Singh, S., & Ahmed, S. (2021). Pro-environmental behaviour of students in higher education institutions: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(5), 951–967. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Silvi, M., & Padilla, E. (2021). Pro-environmental behaviour: Social norms, intrinsic motivation and external conditions. Environmental Policy and Governance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Shadiqi, M. A., Djuwita, R., Febriana, S. K. T., Septiannisa, L., Wildi, M., & Rahmawati, Y. (2022). Environmental Self-Identity and Pro-Environmental Behaviour in Climate Change Issue: Mediation Effect of Belief in Global Warming and Guilty. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Sharpe, E. J., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2021). Pro-environmental behaviour and support for environmental policy as expressions of pro-environmental motivation. Journal of Environmental Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Siero, S., Boon, M., Kok, G., & Siero, F. (1989). Modification of driving behaviour in a large transport organization: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Sun, Q. (2025). Forensic Accounting Approaches to Detecting and Preventing Greenwashing and Data Manipulation in ESG Reporting. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Testa, F., Iovino, R., & Iraldo, F. (2020). The circular economy and consumer behaviour: The mediating role of information seeking in buying circular packaging. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3435-3448. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Tian, H., & Liu, X. (2022). Pro-environmental behaviour research: Theoretical progress and future directions. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(11), 6721. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Vesely, S., & Klockner, C. A. (2018). How anonymity and norms influence costly support for environmental causes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 58, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Wan, C., Shen, G. Q., & Choi, S. (2017). A review on political factors influencing public support for urban environmental policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 75, 70-80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Werff, E. van der, Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013). The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Wu, Y., Chen, Y., Jin, C., Qin, J., Zheng, L., & Chen, Y. (2024). Working-together normative appeals to promote pro-environmental donations. Behavioural Sciences, 14(4), 273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Yu, W., Patros, P., Young, B., Klinac, E., & Walmsley, T. G. (2022). Energy digital twin technology for industrial energy management: Classification, challenges and future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112407. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Zacher, H., & Bissing-Olson, M. J. (2018). Between-and within-person variability in employee pro-environmental behaviour. Research handbook on employee pro-environmental behaviour, 128-147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Jia, M. (2021). Does a sense of calling facilitate sustainability? Research on the influence of calling on employee green behaviour. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3145-3159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors