Investigating the E-Learning Needs of ESL Learners in Digital Learning Platforms

This study was conducted to identify students’ e-learning needs and to determine gaps in the existing e-learning platforms used for learning English as a second language (ESL) at Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Kota Kinabalu and UiTM Kuala Pilah. The issue addressed in this research is that although e-learning platforms have become an integral component of language instruction, many students experience reduced engagement due to a lack of interactive and communicative learning features. The objectives of this study were to identify the e-learning features that students perceive as most useful for language learning and to examine students’ perceptions of the advantages of using digital platforms to support ESL learning. A needs analysis survey was administered online to 198 respondents across various academic programmes at both campuses. The survey explored students’ experiences with current platforms, focusing on areas such as interactivity, engagement, and perceived advantages of online learning. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarise students’ responses and determine common patterns in their needs and preferences. The findings highlighted that students expressed stronger preferences for platforms that incorporate interactive elements such as real-time feedback, multimedia learning, collaboration, and task-based activities. The analysis also indicated that students would benefit more from an environment that provides ample opportunities to practise the language and engage with interactive lessons. These results suggest the importance of enhancing e-learning systems with more dynamic, participatory, and communicative features to better support learner engagement and improve ESL learning outcomes.

e-learning, needs analysis, ESL learners, e-learning features

1. Asad, M., Hussain, N., Wadho, M., Khand, Z., & Churi, P. (2020). Integration of e-learning technologies for interactive teaching and learning process: An empirical study on higher education institutes of Pakistan. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-04-2020-0103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Azimi, H. M. (2013). E-learning needs assessment among students in the colleges of education. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(1), 11-22. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1086427.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barros, M. (2023). Teaching product design morphology: Matching educational goals with affordances of digital tools. https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2023.12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Blankenbeckler, P., Graves, T., & Wampler, R. (2014). Designing interactive multimedia instruction to address soldiers' learning needs. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada616380 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2018) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Los Angeles. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. DOI: 10.1177/0047239520934018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Huber, S., & Ravi, S. (2021). A visual design framework and assessment to inform instruction., 39–52. https://doi.org/10.52917/ivlatbsr.2021.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kukulska‐Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2017). Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12580 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Leong, A., Abidin, M., & Saibon, J. (2019). The benefits and drawbacks of using tablet-based digital storytelling in vocabulary learning among Malaysian young English as a Second Language (ESL) learners. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 34, 17–47. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2019.34.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Manogaran, D., & Sulaiman, N. (2022). Systematic review: Effectiveness of social media in improving speaking skills of ESL learners. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v11-i3/14722 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2021). Digital Learning Policy Framework. Putrajaya: MOHE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://www.mohe.gov.my/en/download/manuals-and-guidelines [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Moralista, R., & Oducado, R. (2020). Faculty perception toward online education in a state college in the Philippines during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4736–4742. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Morat, B., Shaari, A., Abidin, M., & Abdullah, A. (2017). YouTube within ESL classroom: Exploring an instructor’s and her learners’ experiences concerning the authenticity of language and technology use. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli.2017.7802 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Muhamad, M., & Goh, H. S. (2022). Issues in the Implementation of 21st Century Learning Skills in Malaysian ESL Classrooms. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 18(4), 1093-1104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Murad, W. (2023). Exploring the linguistic playground: Investigating Facebook as an informal language learning hub for ESL learners. SJLL, 1(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.62681/sprypublishers.sjll/1/1/2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nhan, L. (2024). Advantages and barriers in online ESL learning environment: A review of literature. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v7i2p108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Othman, K., & Rahman, S. (2023). Virtual flipped classroom: English as a Second Language (ESL) learners’ decision-making styles in academic reading. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i3/16501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pallant, J. (2002). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step-by-Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows (Version 12). Open University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Perestelo‐Pérez, L., Torres‐Castaño, A., González, C., Álvarez‐Pérez, Y., Toledo‐Chávarri, A., Wägner, A., … & Serrano‐Aguilar, P. (2020). IC-Health project: Development of MOOCs to promote digital health literacy: First results and future challenges. Sustainability, 12(16), 6642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Qizi, M. (2024). Exploring innovative approaches to teaching English as a Second Language (ESL). EJHEAA, 1(9), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.61796/ejheaa.v1i9.964 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rashid, S., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement, and academic performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rashid, A., Yunus, M., & Wahi, W. (2019). Using Padlet for collaborative writing among ESL learners. Creative Education, 10(3), 610–620. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.103044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ritzhaupt, A., & Kumar, S. (2015). Knowledge and skills needed by instructional designers in higher education. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 28(3), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21196 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sharifuddin, N., & Hashim, H. (2024). Benefits and challenges in implementing Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) in ESL classroom: A systematic review (2019–2022). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i1/20422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sharp, L. (2018). Collaborative digital literacy practices among adult learners: Levels of confidence and perceptions of importance. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11111a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Siumarlata, V. (2024). Innovative approaches to teaching English as a Second Language: Integrating technology for enhanced learning outcomes. Global, 2(9), 1982–1996. https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i9.291 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tatlı, Z., Saylan, E., & Kokoç, M. (2022). Digital storytelling in an online EFL course: Influences on speaking, vocabulary, and cognitive load. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.130.9.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. United Nations. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. New York: UN Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2006). Mass Media Research: An Introduction (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth Publishing. https://archive.org/details/massmediaresearc0000wimm_d1e9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Yumnam, R. (2021). E-learning: An effective mode of teaching English as a Second Language. Journal of Translation and Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.48185/jtls.v2i2.275 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zhu, Z.-T., Yu, M.-H., & Riezebos, P. (2016). A Research Framework of Smart Education. Smart Learning Environments, 3, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study