Is There a Relationship between Motivational Beliefs and Cognitive Strategy Use and Self-Regulation?

Authors

Nurfarah Saiful Azam

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Mohamed Hafizuddin Mohamed Jamrus

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Nadiah Zubbir

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Noor Aizah Abas

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Noor Hanim Rahmat

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000222

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 2741-2753

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-07

Accepted: 2025-10-14

Published: 2025-11-08

Abstract

Understanding how learners' beliefs influence their use of cognitive strategies and self-regulation is an important issue in educational psychology, as motivational beliefs, cognitive strategy use, and self-control are interconnected. And there is a cyclical relationship between these three components. Motivational beliefs drive the use of cognitive strategies, which in turn enhance self-control. This cycle leads to better academic outcomes and the development of lifelong learning skills. The researchers were motivated to carry out this study because investigating this allows them to understand how these factors impact students' learning outcomes and can provide instructors with insights into more effective teaching strategies. The objective of this study is to explore the motivational factors that influence learning among undergraduate students. A quantitative approach was employed for this study. A 5-point Likert-scale survey, based on Pintrich & De Groot (1990), was used to measure the relevant variables. The survey consists of three sections: Section A includes demographic questions, Section B contains 22 items on motivational beliefs, and Section C comprises 22 items on self-regulated learning strategies.The survey was completed by a purposive sample of 282 undergraduate students from the largest public university in Malaysia. The findings of this study is that students generally have moderate to high confidence in their abilities, strong motivation to learn, and moderate levels of test anxiety suggesting that motivation plays a vital role in students' learning experiences and performances. Next, students actively use cognitive strategies to process information and apply self-regulation techniques, although some areas need improvement. Lastly, there is a moderately positive correlation between motivational beliefs and self-regulated strategies, suggesting that students who are more motivated tend to use more cognitive strategies and self-regulation techniques which has significant implications for teaching and learning by focusing on fostering both motivation and self-regulation. There is the need to enhance student motivation through goal-setting exercises, positive feedback, and relevant teaching materials. Developing self-regulated learning skills by integrating metacognitive training to help students monitor their progress, adjust their study strategies, and become more independent learners are also encouraged. Future researchers could investigate whether early interventions aimed at improving student motivation lead to long-term academic success.

Keywords

Motivation, Motivational Beliefs, Cognitive Strategy, Self-Regulation

Downloads

References

1. Bandura A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586–598. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88-100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gharghani, A. A., Gharghani, Ma A. & Hayat, A. A. (2019). Correlation of Motivational Beliefs and Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies with Academic Achievement of Students of Shiraz University of Medical Science. Strides Dev Med Educ.,15(1), 1- 8. DOI: 10.5812/sdme.81169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Jackson,S.L. (2015) Research methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5tH Edition) Boston, USA:: Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Marucci, c. (2022). Fostering Self-Regulated Learning Through School Newspapers. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(5), 219-224. https://articlearchives.co/index.php/JHETP/article/view/5199/5160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ocak,G. & Yamac, A. (2013). Examination of the Relationships between Fifth Graders’ Self-Regulated Learning Strategies, Motivational Beliefs, Attitudes, and Achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(1), 380-387.https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1016657 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning Components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rahmat, N. H. & Thasrabiab, T. (2024) Exploring Motivation and Self-Regulation from the Social Cognitive View. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 14(1), 3276-3290. 10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i1/20476 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Smit, K., de Brabander, C. J., Boekaerts, M., & Martens, R. L. (2017). The self-regulation of motivation: Motivational strategies as mediator between motivational beliefs and engagement for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 124–134. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.01.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–649). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50048-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Weinstein, C. and Mayer, R. (1986) The Teaching of Learning Strategies. In: Wittrock, M., Ed., Handbook of Research on Teaching, Macmillan, New York, 315-327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Yew, N. A. M., Hamid, N. A. A., Singh, K. K. M., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). Exploring Motivational Beliefs and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Learning among Undergraduates. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(7), 72 – 89. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i7/17043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Zainuddin, N.A., Amin, N., Dahlan, J.M., Rahmat, A.M. & Rahmat, N. H. (2023).Exploring Motivational Beliefs and Learning Approaches among Undergraduates Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Science, 13 (11), 1728-1742. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i11/19539 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. Plenum Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zimmerman, B., & Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zimmerman, B., & Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284-290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zimmerman, B.J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles