Keyakinan in Malaysia Madani: Linking Maqasid al-Shariah and Modern Islamic Political Theory

Authors

Rosmalizawati Abd. Rashid

Faculty of Contemporary Islamic Studies, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)

Muhammad Nurul Salihin Mazni Fairuz

Faculty of Contemporary Islamic Studies, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)

Rohaizan Baru

Faculty of Contemporary Islamic Studies, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)

Rahimah Embong

Faculty of Contemporary Islamic Studies, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)

Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Al-Haddar

Faculty of Contemporary Islamic Studies, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Malaysia)

Syahidin

Universitas Pendidikan (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.930000066

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 9/30 | Page No: 518-525

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-10

Accepted: 2025-12-16

Published: 2025-12-27

Abstract

This article examines the concept of Keyakinan (conviction) as a foundational moral and civic value within the Malaysia Madani framework. Although frequently invoked as a normative principle in public discourse, Keyakinan remains theoretically underexplored in relation to Islamic jurisprudential objectives and contemporary governance theory. Drawing upon Qur’anic injunctions, Prophetic traditions, Maqasid al-Shariah and modern Islamic political thought, this study conceptualizes conviction as a governance-enabling value that bridges personal ethics, institutional integrity and societal trust. Employing a qualitative, conceptual and interpretive research design, the study synthesizes classical Islamic scholarship, contemporary theoretical literature and selected policy narratives to construct an integrated analytical framework linking Keyakinan with maqasid-guided governance. The findings demonstrate that conviction functions as a strategic pillar for ethical leadership, participatory citizenship and institutional resilience, providing a normative foundation for embedding moral consciousness within modern statecraft. This article contributes to the literature by explicitly positioning Keyakinan at the intersection of Maqasid al-Shariah and modern Islamic political theory, offering a value-based framework relevant to policymakers, scholars and practitioners concerned with ethical governance and nation-building in Muslim-majority societies.

Keywords

Keyakinan, Maqasid al-Shariah, Islamic

Downloads

References

1. Alal al-Fasi, M. (2004). Maqasid al-Shariah: Contemporary Applications. Dar al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Farmawi, A. H. (1997). Al-Bidayah fi al-Tafsir al-Maudu‘i. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Ghazali. (2004). Ihya’ Ulum al-Din. Islamic Book Trust. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Mawardi. (2000). Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniyyah. Dar al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Qur’an Al-Karim. (n.d.). https://quran.com/Al-Shatibi, I. (1997). Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shariah. Dar al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Anwar Ibrahim. (2023). Membangun Negara Madani. Institut Darul Ehsan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Beekun, R. I. & Badawi, J. A. (2005). Leadership: An Islamic Perspective. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bevir, M. & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2010). The State as Cultural Practice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chapra, M. U. (2000). The Future of Economics: An Islamic Perspective. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. J. Auda. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. IIIT. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jabareen, Y. (2009). “Building a Conceptual Framework.” [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kamali, M. H. (2011). Islam and Good Governance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kamali, M. H. (2019). Shariah Law: An Introduction / governance-related writing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Krippendorff, Klaus. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Schwartz-Shea, P. & Yanow, D. (2012). Interpretive Research Design. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles