Language Use and Choice Among the Semai Community in Kampung Sungai Perah, Parit, Perak
Authors
Department of Malay Studies, Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Siti Nur Zulaika Binti Mohd Isyam
Department of Malay Studies, Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.924ILEIID0076
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/24 | Page No: 715-722
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-09-23
Accepted: 2025-09-30
Published: 2025-11-01
Abstract
This study examines the phenomenon of language choice among the Semai Indigenous community in Kampung Sungai Perah, Parit, Perak, focusing on language proficiency and language use across different domains. Fishman’s (1972) domain theory was employed as the conceptual framework to understand these dynamics. Data were collected through structured questionnaires from 112 respondents, representing 20% of the population, and analysed descriptively using SPSS. The findings indicate that Malay language is more dominant across most communication domains, while the Semai language remains in use within family settings and traditional ceremonies. These results highlight that the Semai language is endangered, particularly among younger generations, and underscore the need for integrated revitalization strategies to ensure the preservation of the community’s language and cultural heritage.
Keywords
Language choice, Semai Indigenous community, Minority language
Downloads
References
1. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Devamany S. Krishnasamy & Asan Ali Golam Hassan. (2016). Masyarakat Orang Asli: Impak Program Penempatan Semula. UUM Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. David, M. K., & Dealwis, C. (2008). Language use in the domain of neighbourhood: The case of the Bidayuh in Sarawak. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre Journal, 39(2), 195–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., &Fennig, C. D. (2020.). Ethnologue: Languages of the World (23rd ed.). SIL International [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Fasold, R. (1984). The Socioliguistics of Society. Oxford. Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Fishman, J. A. (1972). The sociology of language: An interdisciplinary social science approach to language in society. Newbury House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Heller, M. (2008). Doing ethnography. In L. Wei & M. G. Moyer (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to research methods in bilingualism and multilingualism (pp. 249–262). Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Jabatan Kemajuan Orang Asli (JAKOA). (2024). Taburan etnik Orang Asli mengikut etnik / sub-etnik mengikut negeri. Retrieved September 20, 2025, from https://www.jakoa.gov.my/umum/taburan-etnik-orang-asli-mengikut-etnik-sub-etnik-mengikut-negeri/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Khairul Ashraaf Saari & Harishon Radzi. (2023). Pemilihan Bahasa dalam Kalangan Peserta Latihan dan Dakwah OrangAsli, Kok Lanas Berdasarkan Tiga Domain. Jurnal Linguistik. Vol 27 (1) Mei 2023 (129- 139) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Milroy, L., & Gordon, M. (2003). Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Noriah Mohamed. (2008). Language choice and identity among minority speakers in Malaysia. Kajian Malaysia, 26(1–2), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Sandai, R., & Mahmud, C. T. (2023). The influence of cultural attitudes on language development amongst indigenous young Semai children. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 12(1), 1–10. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/SAECJ/article/view/957 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Weinreich, U. (1970). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Zailani, S. A. B., Makhtar, R., & Yusop, M. S. (2022). Pemilihan bahasa dalam masyarakat Semai di Hulu Selangor. e-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 16(9), 115–132. Retrieved from https://ejournals.ukm.my/ebangi/article/view/36294 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study