Lecturer Teaching Style and Learning Style do not affect academic Achievement: A Report on Evidence of a Mediating Variable

Authors

Kurnaemi Anita

Institusi Agama Islam STIBA Makassar, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Muhammad Nirwan Idris

Institusi Agama Islam STIBA Makassar, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Muhammad Isra Syarif

Institusi Agama Islam STIBA Makassar, Indonesia (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0691

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/26 | Page No: 9118-9133

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-10

Accepted: 2025-11-20

Published: 2025-11-25

Abstract

Purpose
The roles of lecturers' teaching styles and students' learning styles remain uncertain regarding their impact on academic performance. This study investigates the effects of these styles on academic achievement among religious students, aiming to develop new strategies for the teaching and learning processes.
Methodology
The participants in this research were religious students from South Sulawesi, Indonesia, who actively engaged in their studies from 2021 to 2024, comprising a total of 754 individuals (43.5% male, 56.5% female). The data is analyzed using SEM-PLS software.
Findings
The findings indicate that neither of these variables significantly influences academic achievement unless mediated by intelligence. Intelligence acts as a mediating variable, facilitating the influence of lecturers' teaching styles and students' learning styles on academic performance. The researchers argue that lecturers play a crucial role in delivering instructional content through appropriate methods, designing engaging learning activities, and providing memorable educational experiences for students.
Novelty
This study is the first to compile 7 variables that are presumed to influence academic achievement, using 2 mediating variables.
Significance
This study suggests that innovations in teaching practices and enhanced student interactions are crucial for fostering intelligence. Such developments enable students to absorb knowledge effectively, refine their abilities, and cultivate the learning experiences acquired in class, which are essential for navigating future professional environments.

Keywords

Mediating variable, Structural Equation Modeling, Influence, Intelligence

Downloads

References

1. Abbassi, F. A., Hussain, K., Farooq, S., & Akhtar, N. (2018). Best model selection for determinants of students’ academic performance at tertiary level in azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. New Educational Review, 51(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2018.51.1.05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahinful, G. S., Tauringana, V., Bansah, E. A., & Essuman, D. (2019). Determinants of academic performance of accounting students in Ghanaian secondary and tertiary education institutions. Accounting Education, 28(6), 553–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2019.1679204 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Qahtani, M. F. (2015). Associations between approaches to study, the learning environment, and academic achievement. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 10(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2015.01.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arthur, N., & Everaert, P. (2012). Gender and Performance in Accounting Examinations: Exploring the Impact of Examination Format. Accounting Education, 21(5), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2011.650447 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Awang, H., Abd Samad, N., Mohd Faiz, N. S., Roddin, R., & Kankia, J. D. (2017). Relationship between the Learning Styles Preferences and Academic Achievement. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 226(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/226/1/012193 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Baharudin, A. F., Sahabudin, N. A., & Kamaludin, A. (2017). Behavioral tracking in E-learning by using learning styles approach. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 8(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v8.i1.pp17-26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bakar, N. A., Alsmadi, M. S., Ali, Z., Shuaibu, A., & Solahudin, M. H. (2022). Influence of Students’ Motivation Influence of Students’ Motivation on Academic Achievement Among Undergraduate Students in Malaysia. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 3443–3450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bate, G. P., Velos, S. P., Gimena, G. B., & Go, M. B. (2022). Influence of IQ and Personality on College Students’ Academic Performance In A Philippine State University. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 2022(4), 5876–5882. http://journalppw.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Berhanu, K. Z., & Sabanci, A. (2020). Factors Influencing University Students’ Academic Achievement and Strategies Taken to Improve Their Achievement: Ethiopia as a Sample. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(3), 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.559972 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bilgin, E., Bulca, Y., & Demirhan, G. (2020). Relationships Between Physical Activity Level, Health- Related Fitness, Academic Achievement, and Academic Self-Concept. Education and Science, 45(202), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8343 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bin Abdulrahman, K. A., Alshehri, A. S., Alkhalifah, K. M., Alasiri, A., Aldayel, M. S., Alahmari, F. S., Alothman, A. M., & Alfadhel, M. A. (2023). The Relationship Between Motivation and Academic Performance Among Medical Students in Riyadh. Cureus, 15(10), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46815 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Blankenburg, J. S., Höffler, T. N., Peters, H., & Parchmann, I. (2016). The effectiveness of a project day to introduce sixth grade students to science competitions. Research in Science and Technological Education, 34(3), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1222361 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chan, T. J., & Dai, M. (2023). Factors Influencing Academic Achievement of University Students. LANGUAGE AND CULTURE Journal of Communication, Language and Culture, 3(2), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.33093/jclc.2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chetty, N. D. S., Handayani, L., Sahabudin, N. A., Ali, Z., Hamzah, N., Rahman, N. S. A., & Kasim, S. (2019). Learning styles and teaching styles determine students’ academic performances. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(3), 610–615. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in Management Research: What, Why, When, and How. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Demming, C. L., Jahn, S., & Boztug, Y. (2017). Conducting Mediation Analysis in Marketing Research. Marketing ZFP, 39(3), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-76 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 39(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Donnelly, J. A. (2017). The Relationship Between Physical Fitness and School Performance. Journal of Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, 11(1), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.5590/jsbhs.2017.11.1.16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Dryer, R., Henning, M. A., Tyson, G. A., & Shaw, R. (2016). Academic Achievement Performance of University Students with Disability: Exploring the Influence of Non-academic Factors. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63(4), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2015.1130217 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Duff, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2015). Antecedents and consequences of accounting students’ approaches to learning: A cluster analytic approach. British Accounting Review, 47(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.06.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ede, M. O., & Igbokwe, U. O. (2018). Meta-analysis of the effects of mastery learning on students’ academic achievements in Nigeria. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education; Bingley, 10(4), 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2018-0029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Edgerton, E., McKechnie, J., & McEwen, S. (2011). Students’ perceptions of their school environments and the relationship with educational outcomes. Educational and Child Psychology, 28(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2011.28.1.33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Esmail Sabra, H., Mohammed Hassan, A., & Mostafa Mohammed, H. (2018). Relation between Students’ Perception of Teaching Styles and Students’ Academic Engagement in South Valley and Assiut Universities. Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 9(1), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhc.2018.13953 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ezenwoke, O. A., Efobi, U. R., Asaleye, A. J., & Felix, D. E. (2020). The determinants of undergraduate accounting students’ early participation in professional examinations. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1818411 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Fallan, L., & Opstad, L. (2014). Beyond gender performance in accounting: Does personality distinction matter? Accounting Education, 23(4), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2014.930693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Foong, C. C., & Liew, P. Y. (2022). The relationships between academic motivation and academic performance of first-year chemical engineering students. 2433, 020012, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Goodman, S., Jaffer, T., Keresztesi, M., Mamdani, F., Mokgatle, D., Musariri, M., Pires, J., & Schlechter, A. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between students’ motivation and academic performance as mediated by effort. South African Journal of Psychology, 41(3), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124631104100311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R (1st ed.). the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Gewerbestrasse. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hair, J. F., Matthews, L., Matthews, R., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hanushek, E. A. (2020). Education production functions. In The Economics of Education: A Comprehensive Overview (pp. 161–170). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815391-8.00013-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Husin, N., Che Mat, A., Husin, N. H. R., & Hashim, N. (2023). Decoding Teaching Styles of Language Lecturers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6), 1914–1929. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i6/17256 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Iqbal, K., Chaudhry, S. R., Lodhi, H. N., Khaliq, S., Taseer, M., & Saeed, M. (2021). Relationship between IQ and academic performance of medical students. The Professional Medical Journal, 28(02), 242–246. https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2021.28.02.4348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Jepsen, D. M., Varhegyi, M. M., & Teo, S. T. T. (2015). The association between learning styles and perception of teaching quality. Education and Training, 57(5), 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2014-0005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Keerthigha, C., & Singh, S. (2023). The effect of teaching style and academic motivation on student evaluation of teaching: Insights from social cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1107375), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1107375 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2013). Who Rises to the Top? Early Indicators. Psychological Science, 24(5), 648–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457784 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Khumalo, M., & Utete, R. (2023). Factors That Influence Academic Performance of Students: an Empirical Stud. The Seybold Report, 5(18), 1710–1722. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JCMKU [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2016). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods: Sample size in PLS-based SEM. Information Systems Journal, 28(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Kohan, N., Janatolmakan, M., Rezaei, M., & Khatony, A. (2021). Relationship between Learning Styles and Academic Performance among Virtual Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Education Research International, 2021(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8543052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Kumar, A., Singh, N., & Ahuja, N. J. (2017). Learning styles based adaptive intelligent tutoring systems: Document analysis of articles published between 2001. and 2016. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 5(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1702083K [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Lachowicz, M. J., Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2018). A novel measure of effect size for mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 23(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Lee, W., Lee, M.-J., & Bong, M. (2014). Testing Interest and Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Academic Self-Regulation and Achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Longobardi, C., Pasta, T., Marengo, D., Prino, L. E., & Settanni, M. (2018). Measuring Quality of Classroom Interactions in Italian Primary School: Structural Validity of the CLASS K–3. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2018.1533795 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Lozano-Blasco, R., Quílez-Robres, A., Usán, P., Salavera, C., & Casanovas-López, R. (2022). Types of Intelligence and Academic Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Mappadang, A., Khusaini, K., Sinaga, M., & Elizabeth, E. (2022). Academic interest determines the academic performance of undergraduate accounting students: Multinomial logit evidence. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2101326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Mei Ph’Ng, L. (2018). Teaching Styles, Learning Styles and the ESP Classroom. MATEC Web of Conferences, 150. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Meyer, J., Fleckenstein, J., & Köller, O. (2019). Expectancy Value Interactions and Academic Achievement: Differential Relationships with Achievement Measures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Mørk, G., Magne, T. A., Carstensen, T., Stigen, L., Åsli, L. A., Gramstad, A., Johnson, S. G., & Bonsaksen, T. (2020). Associations between learning environment variables and students’ approaches to studying: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02033-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Mozaffari, H. R., Janatolmakan, M., Sharifi, R., Ghandinejad, F., Andayeshgar, B., & Khatony, A. (2020). The relationship between the vark learning styles and academic achievement in dental students. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 11(4), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S235002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Niet, A. G. van der, Hartman, E., Smith, J., & Visscher, C. (2014). Modeling relationships between physical fitness, executive functioning, and academic achievement in primary school children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(4), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.02.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Ogbeibu, S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Gaskin, J., Senadjki, A., & Hughes, M. (2021). Leveraging STARA competencies and green creativity to boost green organisational innovative evidence: A praxis for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2421–2440. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2754 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Oyewobi, L. O., Bolarin, G., Oladosu, N. T., & Jimoh, R. A. (2020). Influence of stress and coping strategies on undergraduate students’ performance. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(4), 1043–1061. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2020-0066 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Ozcan, M. (2021). Factors Affecting Students’ Academic Achievement according to the Teachers’ Opinion. Education Reform Journal, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22596/erj2021.06.01.1.18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Pérez-López, M. C., & Ibarrondo-Dávila, M. P. (2019). Key variables for academic performance in university accounting studies. A mediation model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1620624 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Ph’ng, L. M., Ming, T. S., & Nambiar, R. M. K. (2016). Match or mismatch: Teaching styles and learning styles in an ESP classroom. Social Sciences (Pakistan), 11(12), 2977–2982. https://doi.org/10.3923/sscience.2016.2977.2982 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Pishghadam, R., Faribi, M., Kolahi Ahari, M., Shadloo, F., Gholami, M. J., & Shayesteh, S. (2022). Intelligence, emotional intelligence, and emo-sensory intelligence: Which one is a better predictor of university students’ academic success? Frontiers in Psychology, 13(995988), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.995988 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Quilez-Robres, A., González-Andrade, A., Ortega, Z., & Santiago-Ramajo, S. (2021). Intelligence quotient, short-term memory and study habits as academic achievement predictors of elementary school: A follow-up study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Redondo-Flórez, L., Ramos-Campo, D. J., & Clemente-Suárez, V. J. (2022). Relationship between Physical Fitness and Academic Performance in University Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Risher, J., & Hair, J. (2017). The Robustness of PLS Across Disciplines. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332354144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Sadiku, G. S., & Sylaj, V. (2019). Factors That Influence the Level of the Academic Performance of the Students. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(3), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v20i1.6503 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Nitzl, C., Ringle, C. M., & Howard, M. C. (2020). Beyond a tandem analysis of SEM and PROCESS: Use of PLS-SEM for mediation analyses! International Journal of Market Research, 62(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320915686 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In Handbook of Market Research (Vol. 1, pp. 1–40). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Shaari, A. S., Yusoff, N. M., Ghazali, I. M., Osman, R. H., & Dzahir, N. F. M. (2014). The Relationship between Lecturers’ Teaching Style and Students’ Academic Engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Sharma, D., & Sharma, S. (2018). International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research Relationship between motivation and academic achievement QR Code *Correspondence Info. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research, 4(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.7439/ijasr [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Shook, S. U. (2016). The Relationship Between Physical Fitness and Academic Achievement in Sixth Grade Students. Walden University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Sivrikaya, A. H. (2019). The Relationship between Academic Motivation and Academic Achievement of the Students. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 5(2), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2019.52.309.315 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Sothan, S. (2019). The determinants of academic performance: Evidence from a Cambodian University. Studies in Higher Education, 44(11), 2096–2111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079. 2018.1496408 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Steinmayr, R., Weidinger, A. F., & Wigfield, A. (2018). Does students’ grit predict their school achievement above and beyond their personality, motivation, and engagement? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.02.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Sternberg, R. J. (2019). A theory of adaptive intelligence and its relation to general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 7(4), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7040023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Tang, C. W., Shi, M. J., & Gusman, A. de. (2022). Lecturer teaching styles and student learning involvement in large classes: a Taiwan case study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education , 42(3), 447–463. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Thu Ha, N. T. (2021). Effects of Learning Style on Students Achievement: Experimental Research. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS3.1515 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Vidyakala, K., Nandhini, P., Nithyakala, & Deepa, J. (2019). A Conceptual Study on Relationship Between Learning Styles and Academic Performance. International Journal of Management, 9(3), 260–266. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3616819 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 33(1), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Yarin, A. J., Encalada, I. A., Elias, J. W., Surichaqui, A. A., Sulca, R. E., & Pozo, F. (2022). Relationship between Motivation and Academic Performance in Peruvian Undergraduate Students in the Subject Mathematics. Education Research International, 2022(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3667076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Zhoc, K. C. H., Chung, T. S. H., & King, R. B. (2018). Emotional intelligence (EI) and self-directed learning: Examining their relation and contribution to better student learning outcomes in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 982–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3472 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles