Legal Analysis on the Role of Ombudsman in Banking and Finance Disputes: A Comparative Study between Malaysia and Australia

Financial Markets Ombudsman Service (FMOS) in Malaysia is a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) that provides an accessible and affordable resolution mode for financial consumers. The FMOS was previously known as the Ombudsman for Financial Services (OFS) and had recently consolidated with the Securities Industry Dispute Resolution Centre (SIDREC) under the Securities Commission Malaysia. Before the consolidation with SIDREC, which took effect in January 2025, OFS had the jurisdiction to hear financial disputes between individuals and Financial Service Providers, as well as claims against private organisations or individuals. Meanwhile, SIDREC was able to cater to disputes involving capital markets services and products. However, although the new integration offers alternative dispute resolution to consumers, service providers, investors, and sole proprietors, the FMOS continues to experience low public patronage. The OFS Annual Report 2024 recorded that only 1856 new cases were registered. However, the number of financial disputes has increased significantly over the years, and statistically, the report also shows that awareness of the OFS remains at only 12.7%. Moreover, the FMOS can only adjudicate claims up to RM250,000, a threshold far below the current average house price of RM490,376, limiting its relevance for disputes involving high-value claims. These structural and procedural constraints show why complainants rely on the judicial system rather than alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. By employing qualitative research methodology using the doctrinal legal research method, this article concentrates on the challenges and jurisdictional limitations faced by the current FMOS framework when dealing with Conventional and Islamic banking disputes after its consolidation with SIDREC in January 2025, as well as the inadequacies in the Financial Services Act 2013 and Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 regarding its monetary jurisdiction. Moreover, this study is grounded in access to justice theory and institutional legitimacy theory to evaluate the effectiveness of the FMOS in resolving conflicts in Conventional and Islamic finance in Malaysia. These theories will also guide the comparative analysis between the FMOS and Australia's Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA). Findings reveal that the FMOS's structural and procedural constraints, including its limited jurisdiction, weak enforcement powers, and low public awareness, resulted in its inadequacy. Therefore, reforms are necessary to strengthen the FMOS's credibility and adequacy, gain public confidence, and abide by the principle of justice.

Financial Ombudsman Scheme, Ombudsman

1. Annual Reports – Fmos. (2024). Fmos.org.my. https://www.fmos.org.my/en/annual-reports/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Annual Review | Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA). (2024). Afca.org.au. https://www.afca.org.au/about-afca/annual-review [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arifin Bin Zakaria, T. (1970). A JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE ON ISLAMIC FINANCE LITIGATION IN MALAYSIA. IIUM Law Journal, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v21i2.100 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Beqiraj, J., Garahan, S., & Shuttleworth, K. (2018). Ombudsman schemes and effective access to justice: A study of international practices and trends. https://repository.essex.ac.uk/29929/1/25 2021 access to justice ombudsman report 2018 full.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. BERNAMA. (2023). Malaysian Banking Sector To See Modest Growth, Profitability In 2024 - Fitch. BERNAMA. https://www.bernama.com/en/news.php?id=224911 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Garth, Bryant G. and Cappelletti, Mauro, "Access to Justice: The Newest Wave in the Worldwide Movement to Make Rights Effective" (1978). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 1142. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Harun, H. N., & Qistina Sallehuddin. (2023, March 8). Govt to expedite tabling of Ombudsman Malaysia Act. NST Online; New Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2023/03/886971/govt-expedite-tabling-ombudsman-malaysia-act [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hizri Hasshan. (2016). Islamic finance litigation: problems within the Malaysian Civil Courts structure. Jurnal Undang-Undang Dan Masyarakat, 20, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jalil, A. (2025, October 6). Banking sector gains traction as loan growth picks up post-OPR cut. NST Online; New Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/business/corporate/2025/10/1288270/banking-sector-gains-traction-loan-growth-picks-post-opr-cut [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mohd Zain, M. I., Rahmat, N. Ezan., Ilias, I., & Setiyono. (2024). Legal Analysis of Malaysia’s Integrated Dispute Resolution Scheme: Lessons from Other Countries. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(28), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9i28.5809 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. National Property Information Centre (NAPIC). (2023). Malaysian House Price Index Q1-Q2 2023. https://napic.jpph.gov.my/portal [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. National Property Information Centre (NAPIC). (2025). Malaysia House Price Index Report Q2 2025. https://napic2.jpph.gov.my/en/archives/indeks-harga-rumah-malaysia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nor, & Ali. (2016). THE INTRODUCTION OF THE FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN SCHEME AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE ISLAMIC FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY IN MALAYSIA—Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilisation, 21(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. OFS. (2021, June 16). LETTER | Many still unaware of Ombudsman for Financial Services. Malaysiakini. https://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/579256 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Oseni, U. A., & Ahmad, A. U. F. (2016). Towards a global hub. International Journal of Law and Management, 58(1), 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-08-2014-0052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Pondel, C. (2019). Legitimacy in Australia’s Financial System External Dispute Resolution Framework: New and Improved or Simply New? University of New South Wales Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.53637/ddgd9816 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Previous Annual Reviews | Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA). (2023). Afca.org.au. https://www.afca.org.au/about-afca/annual-review/previous-annual-reviews [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Suki, N., Mutalip Laidey, N., Shivaanii Sundra Raj, M., & Harbindar Jeet Singh, J. K. (2022). YOUTH AWARENESS OF THE OMBUDSMAN FOR FINANCIAL SERVICE MALAYSIA. Science, Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems, 5(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.56334/sei/5.4.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. The Star Online. (2023, October 2). Banking sector’s loan growth may pick up on steady OPR. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2023/10/03/banking-sectors-loan-growth-may-pick-up-on-steady-opr [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. (2025). Google Books. https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=en&lr=&id=2CIlCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA49&dq=institutional+legitimacy+theory+tyler+and+suchman&ots=5qyhO75Y_E&sig=xAH7aJ7UN6b64GKsHduxxS1h1nM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=institutional%20legitimacy%20theory%20tyler%20and%20suchman&f=false [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. The Star Online. (2024, May 9). Malaysia to retain lead in Asia-Pacific Islamic banking market - S&P Global. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2024/05/09/malaysia-to-retain-lead-in-asia-pacific-islamic-banking-market---sp-global [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• From Compliance to Competitive Advantage: e-KYC Opportunities in Fraud Prevention and Risk Management in Indian Private Banks