Linking Digital Transformation and Sustainable HRM: A Conceptual Framework on the Mediating Role of Digital Competencies
Authors
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kedah, Kampus Sungai Petani, 08400 Merbok, Kedah (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kedah, Kampus Sungai Petani, 08400 Merbok, Kedah (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kedah, Kampus Sungai Petani, 08400 Merbok, Kedah (Malaysia)
Graduate School of Business, SEGI University & Colleges, 47810 Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan (Malaysia)
Ceer Motors, Prince Saud Ibn Abdullah Jalawi, 13535 Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000484
Subject Category: Human Resource Management
Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 5885-5901
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-10-14
Accepted: 2025-10-21
Published: 2025-11-17
Abstract
The accelerating pace of digital transformation is fundamentally revolutionizing organizational structures and practices, yet its connection to sustainable Human Resource Management (SHRM) remains unclear. Although many organizations invest heavily in digital technologies, they often struggle to align these innovations with sustainability goals because of uneven digital competencies among employees and leaders. To address this gap, this study proposes a conceptual framework that positions digital competencies such as technological proficiency, digital literacy, cybersecurity, and AI skills as the critical mediators between digital transformation and SHRM. Using a narrative review methodology, the authors reviewed Scopus-indexed literature published between 2019 and 2025 across the fields of HRM, sustainability, and digital innovation, drawing on the Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capabilities Theory. The findings suggest that digital transformation alone cannot drive sustainable HR outcomes; rather, its effectiveness depends on the strategic development of digital competencies at both individual and organizational levels. Specifically, these competencies enable practices such as green recruitment, eco-efficient performance management, and inclusive digital cultures. In the absence of such capabilities, organizations risk underutilizing the sustainability potential of their digital investments. Theoretically, this framework advances SHRM research by integrating digitalization into the sustainability agenda. Practically, it provides HR leaders with an actionable roadmap to prioritize digital upskilling as a means to unlock sustainable value from technology. The study concludes by calling for empirical validation of the proposed model and further investigation into contextual factors, including industry type, organizational size, and national culture, that may shape its implementation. Ultimately, this study lays the groundwork for HR systems that are not only digitally advanced but also environmentally responsible and socially equitable in the era of Industry 5.0, which is a concept denoting human-centric and sustainable technological integration.
Keywords
Digital transformation, Digital competencies, Sustainable human resource management (SHRM), Conceptual framework, Sustainability
Downloads
References
1. Adisa, O., Ajadi, T. H., & Keshtiban, A. (2024). Navigating human-technology nexus for environmental and organizational sustainability in industry 5.0. In Sustainable Development in Industry and Society 5.0: Governance, Management, and Financial Implications (pp. 115–132). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alexandro, R. (2025). Strategic human resource management in the digital economy era: an empirical study of challenges and opportunities among MSMEs and startups in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2528436. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alharthi, S., & Soomro, B. A. (2025). Enabling a smart change: The role of digital enablers, digital transformation and employee dynamics towards organizational resilience and performance in the food industry. British Food Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2025-0247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ali, A., Yang, Q., Ali, A., Ali, Z., & Noman, M. (2025). How and when AI-driven capabilities foster organizational sustainability: A moderated mediation analysis of digital literacy and green HRM. International Journal of Information Management, 85, Article 102956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102956 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Alqarni, K., Agina, M. F., Khairy, H. A., Al-Romeedy, B. S., Farrag, D. A., & Abdallah, R. M. (2023). The effect of electronic human resource management systems on sustainable competitive advantages: The roles of sustainable innovation and organizational agility. Sustainability, 15(23), 16382. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316382 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Al-Tayyar Raed Saud, D. (2025). Experimentally evaluate the talent management based on electronic human resources in Saudi SMEs to enhance digital skill proficiency using artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Frontier Technologies and Solutions (ICFTS 2025). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFTS62006.2025.11031622 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Andestari, Y., Sabellah, R. E., & Muafi, M. (2024). Sustainable HR management in the digital era: A conceptual framework. In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (Vol. 545, pp. 1015–1023). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65203-5_87 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ardda, A., Yahya Mohammed, H. O., & Khairi, K. F. (2025). The mediating role of knowledge management processes in the relationship between digital transformation and intellectual capital in the service sector. Paper Asia, 41(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Arora, M., Ahmad, V., Arora, T., & Kumar, R. (2024). Digital Transformation and Talent Management. In Green Metaverse for Greener Economies (pp. 50-70). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bansal, A., Panchal, T., Jabeen, F., & Singh, G. (2023). A study of human resource digital transformation (HRDT): A phenomenon of innovation capability led by digital and individual factors. Journal of Business Research, 168, 114123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of management, 27(6), 625-641. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Boopathi, S., & Gopi, S. (2024). Crafting effective HR strategies for the modern workplace: Navigating the digital frontier. In Convergence of Human Resources Technologies and Industry 5.0 (pp. 23-46). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Campbell, M., Katikireddi, S. V., Sowden, A., & Thomson, H. (2019). Lack of transparency in reporting narrative synthesis of quantitative data: A methodological assessment of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 105, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Cardoso, T. J., & Gomes, P. P. (2025). Advancing digital competencies in public administration empowering civil servants in the digital age. In Digital competency development for public officials: Adapting new technologies in public services (pp. 33–60). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6547-2.ch002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Chaubey, A. (2025). Tackling environmental uncertainties using digital transformation capabilities and human resource flexibility: The moderating effect of absorptive capacity. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 26(1), 89–107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Cook, D. A. (2019). Systematic and nonsystematic reviews: Choosing an approach. In Healthcare Simulation Research: A Practical Guide (pp. 217–232). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Cumba, L. T., Huang, X., & Haggag Kotb Kholaif, M. M. N. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on big data analytics and firm’s sustainability performance in a post-pandemic era. Human Systems Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. de la Torre, A., & De la Vega, I. (2025). Dynamic capabilities and digital innovation: Pathways to competitive advantage through responsible innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 12(1), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. de Pablos, P. O., Lytras, M. D., Alkhaldi, A., & Malik, S. (2025). Insights into digital business, human resource management, and competitiveness. Insights Into Digital Business, Human Resource Management, and Competitiveness. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Demeter, K., Losonci, D., & Nagy, J. (2021). Road to digital manufacturing – a longitudinal case-based analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(7), 1425–1448. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Edu, S. A., Agoyi, M., & Agozie, D. Q. (2020). Integrating digital innovation capabilities towards value creation: A conceptual view. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Enaifoghe, A., Ndebele, N. C., Durokifa, A., & Thusi, X. (2024). Drivers of digital transformation and their efficacy in public sector human resource management. In Digital Transformation in Public Sector Human Resource Management (pp. 39–59). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2889-7.ch003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Espina-Romero, L., Ríos Parra, D., Gutiérrez Hurtado, H., & Vilchez Pirela, R. A. (2024). The role of digital transformation and digital competencies in organizational sustainability: A study of SMEs in Lima, Peru. Sustainability, 16(12), 5012. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Fenech, R., Baguant, P., & Ivanov, D. (2019). The changing role of human resource management in an era of digital transformation. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 22(2), 176–180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Garritty, C., Stevens, A., Hamel, C., Wolfe, D., & others. (2019). Knowledge synthesis in evidence-based medicine. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 49(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Gibb, J., & Haar, J. (2007). IT competency predicting market and development performance: Moderated by organizational size. In Proceedings of the European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS 2007). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., & Malterud, K. (2022). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 28(3), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13685 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Gupta, P., Lakhera, G., Sharma, M., Rawat, N., Joshi, S., & Shah, J. (2025, April). Exploring Sustainable Digital Transformation in HRM: Advancing Employee Well-Being Through Sustainable Practices. In 2025 4th OPJU International Technology Conference (OTCON) on Smart Computing for Innovation and Advancement in Industry 5.0 (pp. 1-6). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Honglei, H., Khan, A. N., Shahzad, K., & Soomro, M. A. (2025). Empowering SMEs for sustainable development: The role of digital transformation and employee well-being. Sustainable Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Hornungová, J., & Petrová, K. (2025). The role of digital transformation on sustainable human resource management. Studies in Business and Economics, 20(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2025-0004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Inan, G. G. (2024). Building digital capabilities in manufacturing SMEs. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Kampoowale, I., Hussien Musa, A. M., Abdalla, A. A., & Elboukhari, Y. A. (2025). Assessing the mediating role of human capital in the relationship between digital transformation and firm performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Khanh, T., & Cuong, D. B. X. (2025). Leadership and digital transformation competency as catalysts for green business performance: The mediating role of business innovation in Vietnamese SMEs. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 12(2), 210–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Kushnareva, I. V., Malinina, O. Y., Fedorkova, A. V., & Alekhina, E. S. (2023). Human resource management based on ESG principles in entrepreneurship of the digital economy to support sustainable development. Springer Climate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Lefaivre, K. A., & Slobogean, G. P. (2013). Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses in orthopaedics. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 21(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-21-01-057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Li, Y. (2023). Digital transformation team’s capabilities for process automation. In 29th Annual Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2023). AIS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Lou, Y., Hong, A., & Li, Y. (2024). Assessing the role of HRM and HRD in enhancing sustainable job performance and innovative work behaviors through digital transformation in ICT companies. Sustainability, 16(12), 5162. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Lukita, C., Goh, T. S., Rizki, M., Riza Chakim, M. H., Williams, A., & Maria Daeli, O. P. (2024). Impact of digital transformation on HR competency from a tech-based organizational perspective. In 2024 3rd International Conference on Creative Communication and Innovative Technology (ICCIT 2024). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIT62134.2024.10701105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Ma, L., Zhang, X., & Dong, L. (2023). Enhancing sustainable performance: The innovative strategy of digital transformation leading green collaborative management. Sustainability, 15(17), 13085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Melendez-Torres, G. J., O’Mara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., & Petticrew, M. (2017). Interpretive analysis of 85 systematic reviews suggests that narrative syntheses and meta-analyses are incommensurate in argumentation. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Melendez-Torres, G. J., Thomas, J., Lorenc, T., & Petticrew, M. (2018). Just how plain are plain tobacco packs? Re-analysis of a systematic review using multilevel meta-analysis suggests lessons about comparative synthesis methods. Systematic Reviews, 7(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0741-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Mijatović, M. D., Uzelac, O., & Stoiljković, A. (2020). Effects of human resources management on the manufacturing firm performance: Sustainable development approach. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(3), 205-212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Mulianto, H., Maarif, M. S., Zulbainarni, N., & Hasanah, N. (2024). Catalyzing public sector transformations with digital competencies: An empirical study of Indonesia’s Ministry of Agrarian and Spatial Planning. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 11(6), 304-314. https://doi.org/10.33168/JLISS.2024.0617 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Muzam, J. (2023). The challenges of modern economy on the competencies of knowledge workers. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(2), 1635–1671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00979-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Mykhailovska, O., Shestakovska, T., Adamyk, O., Filipova, N., Duka, A., & Starchenko, G. (2025). Professional training in the digital age: The role of management in shaping technological awareness. Management (Montevideo), 3, Article 267. https://doi.org/10.62486/agma2025267 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Öztürk, N. (2024). Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Sustainable Development. In Integrating organizational theories with sustainable development (pp. 87–104). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9876-5.ch005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Pittman, E. (2023). Realist synthesis: An innovative approach to literature review for complex management phenomena. Review of Management Literature, 8(2), 34–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Poulose, S., Bhattacharjee, B., & Chakravorty, A. (2024). Determinants and drivers of change for digital transformation and digitalization in human resource management: a systematic literature review and conceptual framework building. Management Review Quarterly, 1-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Rodgers, M., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Roberts, H., Britten, N., & Popay, J. (2009). Testing methodological guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: Effectiveness of interventions to promote smoke alarm ownership and function. Evaluation, 15(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389008097871 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Sani, S., & Mandina, S. P. (2024). Examining the Challenges of Adopting Modern Technologies in Public Sector Human Resource Management. In Digital Transformation in Public Sector Human Resource Management (pp. 60-89). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Sharma, R. C., & Kohli, D. (2023). Embracing digital transformation for sustainable development: The synergy between learning organizations, human resource management, and service quality. Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management, 14(3), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.47297/wspchrmWSP2040-800501.20231403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Singh, R., Mushtaq, S., Kumar, K., & Rahman, O. (2025). Creating sustainable workplace: Enhancing HRM strategies in the digital circular economy. Sustainable Innovations and Digital Circular Economy, (pp. 129–145). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-961064-8_7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Skelly, M., Duong, A., Simunovic, N., & Ayeni, O. R. (2019). Type of review and how to get started. In Basic Methods Handbook for Clinical Orthopaedic Research (pp. 41–56). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Sposato, M., Dittmar, E. C., & Vargas Portillo, J. P. (2025). Web-based systems in HR: A guide to digital transformation in organizations. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 28(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-08-2024-0045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Starke, S., & Ludviga, I. (2025). Unlocking digital potential—The impact of innovation and self-determined learning. Systems, 13(3), Article 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13030166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Sultanova, S. M., Ivanova, M. A., Fomenko, N. M., & Konysbay, A. (2024). Quality management through sustainable HRM based on digital competencies. International Journal for Quality Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Sun, L., Ong, T. S., Teh, B. H., & Di Vaio, A. (2024). Sustainable performance measurement through digital transformation within the sustainable development framework: The mediating effect of supply chain concentration. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 3456–3470. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. van den Berg, M. J., Stander, M. W., & van der Vaart, L. (2020). An exploration of key human resource practitioner competencies in a digitally transformed organisation. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, Article 1345. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v18i0.1345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Vărzaru, A. A. (2022). An empirical framework for assessing the Balanced Scorecard impact on sustainable development in healthcare performance measurement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Wang, J., Zhang, J., & Zhao, Y. (2025). Strategic HRM and SME innovation: A chain mechanism of learning-resilience pathway and nonlinear environmental dynamism. Frontiers in Psychology, 16,https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1008869 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Zhang, J., & Chen, Z. (2024). Exploring human resource management digital transformation in the digital age. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 1482–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01214-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Zhang, X., Wang, P., & Peng, L. (2024). Developing a competency model for Human Resource Directors (HRDs) in exponential organizations undergoing digital transformation. Sustainability, 16(23), Article 10540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Zournatzidou, G., Ragazou, K., Sklavos, G., & Sariannidis, N. (2024). Digital transformation and sustainable HRM: The challenges for an eco-friendly business continuity. Sustainability Through Green HRM and Performance Integration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Is Strike Relevant in the Modern Era? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing, IT/Ites, FMCG, Electronics and Emerging Sectors
- A Qualitative Exploration of Work-Life Balance Among Private Universities Lecturers in Klang Valley
- Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: Examining the Impact on Job Satisfaction and Turnover
- Human Resource Management, Organizational Culture, and Good Governance Practices: A Structural Equation Model on Service Orientation among Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation in Davao Region
- Cost of Silence: Exploring the Impact of Organisational Silence on Employee Engagement