Livelihood Assets and Well-Being: The Case of Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM) Participants in Selangor

Authors

Noor Azzara Mohammad

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan (Malaysia)

Radin Siti Aishah Radin a Rahman

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan (Malaysia)

Muhammad Hussin

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000192

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 2321-2329

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-02

Accepted: 2025-10-10

Published: 2025-11-07

Abstract

This study examines the well-being of micro-entrepreneurs participating in Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM) in Selangor through the lens of the Sustainable Livelihood Framework (SLF). Specifically, it analyses asset ownership, socio-economic vulnerability, resilience strategies, and their influence on well-being. A structured quantitative approach was employed, using a questionnaire distributed to 375 AIM participants across seven state constituencies: Sungai Gabai, Sungai Ramal, Sungai Chua, Sungai Tangkas, Bukit Mewah, Beranang, and Semenyih. The large sample size enhances representativeness and strengthens the reliability of statistical analysis. The findings show that both asset ownership and well-being levels are high, while socio-economic vulnerability and resilience strategies are at moderate levels. More importantly, asset ownership demonstrates a stronger influence on well-being compared to other variables, highlighting its central role in improving livelihood outcomes. This study also aligns with Malaysia’s 11th and 12th Development Plans, underscoring its policy relevance for sustainable entrepreneurship and poverty reduction.

Keywords

Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM); Sustainable

Downloads

References

1. Abdullah, H., Sazali, A., & Malarvizhi, C. A. (2010). Impact of Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia’s microcredit scheme on microenterprise assets in Malaysia. Journal of Asian Business and Economics, 20(2), 75–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdullah, H., Sazali, A., & Malarvizhi, C. A. (2011). Microcredit and asset accumulation among the extreme poor households in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 7(7), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n7p169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adato, M., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2002). Assessing the impact of agricultural research on poverty using the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arokia, M. S., Mariam, T., & Norhasni, Z. A. (2011). Livelihood strategies and household well-being. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(3), 100–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ashley, C., & Carney, D. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods: Lessons from early experience. Department for International Development (DFID). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Azizah, A., Nor Aini, I., & Siti Hajar, A. (2013). Sustainable livelihood and happiness: An empirical exploration. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 2(2), 89–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century (IDS Discussion Paper 296). Institute of Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department for International Development. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. DFID. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hussain, M., Haseeb, M., & Kamarudin, F. (2018). The role of microcredit in poverty alleviation: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.26710/jbsee.v4i1.319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Krantz, L. (2001). The sustainable livelihood approach to poverty reduction. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Norma, M. S., & Jarita, D. (2011). Microcredit financing and economic performance of Sahabats AIM. International Journal of Business and Society, 12(1), 15–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Saifoul, Z., Mohd, A., & Jamal, H. (2012). Microcredit and income inequality in Malaysia: An analysis of Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia program. International Journal of Economics and Management, 6(2), 234–250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Zaimah, R. (2010). Managing microcredit among rural women in Kedah, Malaysia. Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 6(2), 66–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Zaini, A., Supian, A., & Norziani, D. (2012). The economic performance of the AIM microcredit program in rural Kedah, Malaysia. Journal of Rural Development, 31(3), 321–335. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles