Malaysia’s Renewable Energy and CO₂ Emissions: ARDL–ECM Evidence with Policy and Managerial Implications

Authors

Azrizal Husin

Faculty of Management and Economics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (Malaysia)

Nur Hayati Abd Rahman

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Kampus Alor Gajah (Malaysia)

Mohd Danial Afiq Khamar Tazilah

Faculty of Management and Economics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (Malaysia)

Heri Yanto

Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Semarang (Malaysia)

Niswah Baroroh

Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Semarang (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000407

Subject Category: Sustainable

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 4948-4957

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-12

Accepted: 2025-10-19

Published: 2025-11-13

Abstract

This study investigates whether renewable energy (RE) adoption reduces carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions in Malaysia and under what conditions the effect is durable. We focus on translating empirical results into decisions for Malaysian firms and policymakers, given continuing reliance on coal-fired power and accelerating—but uneven—RE deployment. A quantitative, time-series design is employed using annual national data. An autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model and its error-correction representation (ECM) are used to separate short-run dynamics from long-run equilibrium relationships. The dependent variable is CO₂ emissions, with RE, GDP growth (economic scale/EKC context), foreign direct investment (FDI), and forest cover as regressors. Model diagnostics address integration properties, lag selection, and stability. Results show that RE has a negative and statistically significant short-run effect on CO₂—consistent with dispatch substitution in which incremental RE output crowds out marginal coal/gas generation. Long-run elasticities for RE and forest cover are directionally negative but statistically imprecise in the baseline specification, while GDP remains emissions-increasing. The ECM coefficient is negative and significant, indicating relatively fast adjustment toward long-run equilibrium. These findings imply that Malaysia can realise near-term abatement via RE procurement and efficiency measures, but durable decarbonisation requires policy sequences that convert substitution into structural displacement—specifically, competitive RE auctions paired with storage and scheduled coal retirements, complemented by green-halo FDI and credible forest governance. The study contributes Malaysia-specific, horizon-separated evidence that informs both managerial energy procurement choices and the state’s transition planning.

Keywords

Renewable Energy, ARDL, ECM, CO₂ Emissions

Downloads

References

1. Akhtar, R., Masud, M. M., & Al-Mamun, A., & Saif, A. N. M. (2023). Energy consumption, CO₂ emissions, foreign direct investment, and economic growth in Malaysia: An NARDL technique. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26246-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aminuddin, F. A., Baihakki, A. S., & Kamaruddin, T. (2025). Roles of local authorities in carbon emission reduction: Case studies from three municipalities in Johor Bahru. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1505(1), 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1505/1/012018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Begum, R. A., Raihan, A., & Said, M. N. M. (2020). Dynamic impacts of economic growth and forested area on carbon dioxide emissions in Malaysia. Sustainability, 12(22), 9375. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9375 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chuah, S. C., Cheam, C. L., Chua, M. S., & […] (2025). The nexus between economic growth, foreign direct investment, renewable energy and ecological footprint in Malaysia. Institutions and Economies, 17, no. 2 (2025): 57-85. http://jice.um.edu.my/index.php/ijie/article/view/60004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Jamaludin, N. F., Muis, Z. A., Hashim, H., Mohamed, O. Y., & Keng, L. L. (2024). A holistic mitigation model for net zero emissions in the palm oil industry. Heliyon, 10(6), e27265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lau, E., Tan, C. C., & Tang, C. F. (2016). Dynamic linkages among hydroelectricity consumption, economic growth, and carbon dioxide emission in Malaysia. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy. 11(11), 1042-1049 https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2014.922135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lau, L. S., Yii, K. J., Lee, C. Y., Chong, Y. L., & Lee, E. H. (2018). Investigating the determinants of renewable energy consumption in Malaysia: An ARDL approach. International Journal of Business and Society. 19(3), 886-903 https://www.ijbs.unimas.my/images/repository/pdf/Vol19-no3-paper20.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mentel, G., Tarczyński, W., Azadi, H., Abdurakmanov, K., Zakirova, E., & Salahodjaev, R. (2022). R&D human capital, renewable energy and CO₂ emissions: Evidence from 26 countries. Energies, 15(23), 9205. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/9205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Naz, S., Sultan, R., Zaman, K., Aldakhil, A. M., Nassani, A. A., & Abro, M. M. Q. (2019). Moderating and mediating role of renewable energy consumption, FDI inflows, and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from robust least square estimator. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 26(3), 2806-2819 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3837-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 94(446), 621-634 https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Pham, P. M. H., Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, M., & Tran, N. T. (2025). FDI inflows and carbon emissions: New global evidence. Discover Sustainability. 6(1), 432 https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01292-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ponce, P., Río-Rama, M. C. del, Álvarez-García, J., & Oliveira, C. (2021). Forest conservation and renewable energy consumption: An ARDL approach. Forests, 12(2), 255. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/2/255 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J., & Mohd, S. (2016). Environmental Kuznets curve and energy consumption in Malaysia: A cointegration approach. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 11(9), 861–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2012.662264 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sarkar, M. S. K., Al-Amin, A. Q., Mustapa, S. I., & Ahsan, M. R. (2019). Energy consumption, CO₂ emission and economic growth: Empirical evidence for Malaysia. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development. 18(3), 318-334 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2019.101036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Segar, Y., Akhir, N. H. M., & Sanusi, N. A. (2024). Forecasting CO₂ emissions in Malaysia through ARIMA modelling: Implications for environmental policy. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 19(3), 849–857. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.190315 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Shahid, S., Minhans, A., & Puan, O. C. (2014). Assessment of greenhouse gas emission reduction measures in transportation sector of Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi, 70(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3481 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Songkin, M., & Jaafar, M. Y. H. (2023, March 15). Electric vehicle readiness in Sabah: Overview of market forecast and adoption challenges. In 2023 6th International Conference on Energy Conservation and Efficiency (ICECE) (Lahore, Pakistan). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icece58062.2023.10092507 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Suman, R., Dwivedi, G., Singh, G., Gidwani, K., & […] (2025). Analyzing the effect of clean cooking fuel and technologies on carbon emissions in G20 countries. Discover Sustainability. 6(1), 93 https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00858-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Vaicondam, Y., Mustafa, A. M. A. A., Roslan, S. N. M., Ming, K. L. Y., & Ramayah, M. (2024). GHG and carbon emission intensity: Examining their impact on financial performance. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 15(1), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.17474 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Xuan, V. N. (2025). Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in technology revolution 6.0: New insights from Brunei. Energy Strategy Reviews. 57, 101633 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24003420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zhao, J. (2025). Exploring the nonlinear dynamic relationship between foreign direct investment, renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: A panel threshold VAR analysis. SAGE Open. 15(2), 21582440251343957 https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251343957 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles