Methodological Reflections on Conducting Qualitative Research During Uncertain Periods

Authors

Haslina Hussein

Department of Food Service and Management, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University Putra Malaysia (Malaysia)

Siti Fatimah Mohamad

Department of Food Service and Management, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University Putra Malaysia (Malaysia)

Farah Adibah Che Ishak

Department of Food Service and Management, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University Putra Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000637

Subject Category: Health

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 7791-7801

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-28

Accepted: 2025-11-05

Published: 2025-11-20

Abstract

This paper presents a methodological reflection on conducting qualitative research during uncertain periods, drawing from the experience of a study undertaken with chefs in Malaysia’s hotel sector during the COVID 19 pandemic. The purpose of this paper is to examine how researchers can maintain methodological rigor, ethical sensitivity, and reflexivity when traditional fieldwork is constrained by external disruptions. The discussion highlights the challenges faced, the adaptive strategies employed, and the lessons learned from conducting research during an environment of uncertainty. A qualitative case study approach guided by the interpretivist paradigm was used to explore the lived experiences of ten chefs working in Klang Valley hotels. Semi structured interviews were conducted virtually through online platforms such as Zoom and Google Meet to overcome restrictions on physical access. Data management and analysis involved iterative coding, reflective journaling, and maintaining an audit trail to ensure transparency and dependability. Regular discussions with academic supervisors and validation with participants enhanced the credibility of the study and reduced interpretive bias. This methodological reflection identifies three central lessons. First, adaptability is essential for preserving the quality and depth of qualitative inquiry in disrupted contexts. Second, reflexivity and empathy are critical in developing rapport and ethical awareness in virtual environments. Third, methodological flexibility enables researchers to transform limitations into opportunities for innovation and learning. The paper concludes that qualitative research can remain credible, rigorous, and contextually meaningful when guided by preparedness, reflection, and a human centered approach. The lessons derived from this experience provide valuable implications for future research undertaken in similarly uncertain or crisis driven conditions.

Keywords

Qualitative research; Methodological reflection

Downloads

References

1. Appannan, J. S., Maheswaran, L., Raimee, N., Lim, W. L., & Amran, F. H. (2022). Job insecurity and psychological distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: The moderating role of perceived supervisor support among hotel employees in Malaysia. Work, 73(4), 1135-1145. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR211467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baum, T., Mooney, S. K. K., Robinson, R. N. S., & Solnet, D. (2020). COVID-19’s impact on the hospitality workforce – New crisis or amplification of the norm? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(9), 2813–2829. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2020-0314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. De Villiers, C., Farooq, M., & Molinari, M. (2021). Qualitative research interviews using online video technology – challenges and opportunities. Meditari Accountancy Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-03-2021-1252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dodds, S., & Hess, A. C. (2021). Adapting research methodology during COVID-19: Lessons for transformative service research. Journal of Service Management, 32(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fujii, L. A. (2018). Interviewing in social science research: A relational approach. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gray, L. M., Wong-Wylie, G., Rempel, G. R., & Cook, K. (2020). Expanding qualitative research interviewing strategies: Zoom video communications. The Qualitative Report, 25(5), 1292–1301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hamid, N. A. A., Rahman, R. A., & Ishak, F. A. C. (2021). Coping with COVID-19 crisis: Hospitality employees’ resilience and career adaptability. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48, 119– 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.06.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hayati, D., & Sinha, S. (2024). Decoding Silence in Digital Cross-Cultural Communication: Overcoming Misunderstandings in Global Teams. Language, Technology, and Social Media. https://doi.org/10.70211/ltsm.v2i2.60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jiang, Y., & Wen, J. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on hotel marketing and management: A perspective article. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(8), 2563–2573. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2020-0237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Johnson, B., Darius, P. S., & Ellis, C. (2022). Conducting qualitative interviews during crises: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative Research Journal, 22(4), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-11-2021-0148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kim, J., Kim, J., & Wang, Y. (2021). Hospitality and tourism management post COVID-19: Transformations and future research directions. Tourism Management Perspectives, 38, 100818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100818 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A. (2020). Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Lo Iacono, V., Symonds, P., & Brown, D. H. K. (2016). Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Sociological Research Online, 21(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3952 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533– 544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Rizou, M., Galanakis, I. M., Aldawoud, T. M., & Galanakis, C. M. (2020). Safety of foods, food supply chain and environment within the COVID-19 pandemic. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 102, 293– 299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.06.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Seitz, S. (2016). Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via Skype: A research note. Qualitative Research, 16(2), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115577011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. The Edge Malaysia. (2022, July 4). State of the Nation: Hospitality industry struggling to cope despite borders reopening. https://theedgemalaysia.com/article/state-nation-hospitality-industry-struggling-copedespite-borders-reopening-brighter [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2021). Skills development for resilience in the post-COVID-19 era: A TVET perspective. Retrieved from https://unevoc.unesco.org/pub/skills_development_for_resilience.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles