Minimalism vs Productivity Demands: Silent Resistance or Breach? Quiet Quitting Through an Employment Law Lens

This article aims to investigate the phenomenon of quiet quitting from the context of modern employment laws where employees who will only engage in minimal work effort, thus meeting only the bare minimum expectations and disengaging from extra discretionary effort, which is often seen as a form of resistance against escalating productivity demands. It critically evaluates whether such disengagement is an act of silent resistance or a breach of employment contract. The paper examines the issue of employee rights, productivity goals, as well as the interaction of employment law, besides offering a framework for evaluating the social and legal ramifications of this trend. This is in order to comprehend how different jurisdictions handle quiet quitting and its possible repercussions for both employers and employees, the article draws on case studies, international legal perspectives, and empirical research. In addition to making sure that workplace cultures and legal frameworks change in a way that supports safe and effective working conditions, the paper offers some suggestions for addressing the root causes of silent resignation.

silent resistance, quiet quitting, employment law lens

1. Abd Aziz, M. F., Ismail, I. A., Abdullah, H., Che Nawi, N. R., Zulkifly, N. A., & Azizul, M. D. A. (2023). PEMANTAPAN PENGURUSAN KESATUAN SEKERJA KAKITANGAN AM UNIVERSITI AWAM DI MALAYSIA: Strengthening the [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Management of General Staff Unions at Public University in Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities Technology and Civilization, 8(2), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijhtc.v8i2.9603 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adeoye, A. O., & Elegunde, A. F. (2023). The impact of leadership style on employee performance: A study of selected SMEs in Nigeria. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 15(4s), 123–134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anderson, J., & Wilson, D. (2020). Quiet quitting: An exploration of its causes and legal implications. Journal of Employment Law and Policy, 29(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15508100.2020.1841742 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barmes, L. (2023). Silencing at work: Sexual harassment, workplace misconduct and NDAs. Industrial Law Journal, 52(1), 68–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwac007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Beccia, F., Rossi, M. F., Gualano, M. R., & Moscato, U. (2024). Quiet quitting: The need to reframe a growing occupational health issue. Social Work, 69(3), 313–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swae023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ball, K. (2021). Workplace surveillance: An overview. Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work, 31(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2021.1902854 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Breaz, T.-R.-O., & Jaradat, M. (2023). Strategic human resource management: Aligning HR practices with organizational goals. Proceedings of the 17th International Management Conference. https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2023/pdf_IMC2023/S4/4_1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bremen, J. (2022, October 31). Setting healthy boundaries is not quiet quitting. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnbremen/2022/10/31/setting-healthy-boundaries-is-not-q uiet-quitting/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP. (2022, October 26). “Quiet quitting” – what is it and how can employers respond? https://www.bclplaw.com/en-US/events-insights-news/Quiet-Quitting-what-is-it-and-how [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. -can-employers-respond.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cieniewicz, A. G. (2016). Commitment profiles of federal government employees who telework: A study (Issue May 2013) [Coastal Carolina University]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558907/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cooper, M., & Murphy, J. (2022). The impact of excessive productivity demands on employee well-being. Workplace Mental Health Review, 8(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1057/wmhr.2022.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Collins, H. (2019). Employment law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Corbin, T. A., & Flenady, G. (2024). Quiet quitting as compensatory respect: Meaningful work, recognition, and the entrepreneurial ethic. Philosophy of Management, 23(4), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-024-00320-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. DavidsonMorris. (2023). Monitoring employees: Guide for UK employers. Retrieved from https://www.davidsonmorris.com/monitoring-employees/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Deakin, S., & Morris, G. S. (2020). Labour law (7th ed.). Hart Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Dollard, M. F., & Bailey, T. S. (2021). Building psychosocial safety climate in turbulent times: The case of COVID-19. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000839 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Galanis, P., Katsiroumpa, A., Vraka, I., Σίσκου, Ό., Konstantakopoulou, O., Κατσούλας, Θ., Moisoglou, I., Gallos, P., & Kaitelidou, D. (2023b). The influence of job burnout on quiet quitting among nurses: The mediating effect of job satisfaction. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3128881/v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Galanis, P., Katsiroumpa, A., Vraka, I., et al. (2023a). The influence of job burnout on quiet quitting among nurses: The mediating effect of job satisfaction. Health, 12(79), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12010079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Galanis, P., Katsiroumpa, A., Vraka, I., et al. (2023b). The quiet quitting scale: Development and initial validation. AIMS Public Health, 10(4), 828–848. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Galanis, P., Katsiroumpa, A., Vraka, I., et al. (2024). Quiet quitting among employees: A proposed cut-off score for the quiet quitting scale. Archives of Hellenic Medicine, 41(3), 381–387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3076541/v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Galanis, P., Moisoglou, I., Malliarou, M., et al. (2024). Quiet quitting among nurses increases their turnover intention: Evidence from Greece in the post-COVID-19 era. Healthcare, 12(79), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12010079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Glick, W. H., & Greenberg, M. (2021). Organisational culture and quiet quitting: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(2), 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1877722 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Government of Sweden. (2021). A good work environment for the future: The Government’s work environment strategy 2021–2025(Government Communication 2020/21:92). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. https://www.government.se/contentassets/7a8a3957c3364717971a18ac3ed1d94d/a-good- work-environment-for-the-future--the-governments-work-environment-strategy-2021202 5.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Greenberg, H., & Larson, S. (2021). Quiet quitting in the post-pandemic era: A reflection of systemic issues in the workplace. Journal of Employment Studies, 31(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363277313214789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Harnois, G., & Gabriel, P. (2000). Mental health and work: Impact, issues and good practices. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66539 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Harvey, S. D. (2024). Qualitative case study on the relationship between workloads and the impact it has on employee job satisfaction. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. International Labour Organization. (2024). Ensuring safety and health at work in a changing climate: Report of the ILO Global Commission on the Future of Work. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/ILO%20OSH%20report%202024%20at% 20a%20glance.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Indian Review of Corporate and Commercial Laws. (2022, September 15). Quiet quitting: Assessing legality and rationale. Retrieved from https://www.irccl.in/post/quiet-quitting-assessing-legality-and-rationale [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Institute for the Future of Work. (2023). Bossware computer tracking devices harm workers' wellbeing, says report. Retrieved from https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/bossware-computer-tracking-devices-harm-workers-w ellbeing-says-report-m37krsd2r [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. International Labour Organization. (2024). Ensuring safety and health at work in a changing climate: Report of the ILO Global Commission on the Future of Work. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/ILO%20OSH%20report%202024%20at% 20a%20glance.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Jaharuddin, N. S., & Zainol, L. N. (2019). The impact of work-life balance on job engagement and turnover intention. South East Asian Journal of Management, 13(1), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.21002/seam.v13i1.10912 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Lewis, D., Sargeant, M., & Schwab, B. (2021). Employment law: The essentials (15th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Lewis, T., & Adams, R. (2021). Quiet quitting and employment contract law: A modern dilemma. Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal, 39(4), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clel.2021.11.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Li, Y., Li, Y., & Castaño, G. (2019). The impact of teaching-research conflict on job burnout among university teachers. International Journal of Conflict Management, 31(1), 76–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-05-2019-0080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Mahand, T., & Caldwell, C. (2023). Quiet quitting – Causes and opportunities. Business and Management Research, 12(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v12n1p9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 99–113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Ming, L., Mamun, A. A., Chen, X., Yang, Q., & Masukujjaman, M. (2023). Quiet quitting during COVID-19: The role of psychological empowerment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02012-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Omar, M. K., Aluwi, A. H., Mohd Fauzi, M. W., & Hairpuddin, N. F. (2020). Work stress, workload, work-life balance, and intention to leave among employees of an insurance company in Malaysia. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 21(2), 70–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. https://ijbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/IJBEL21_061.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Patel, P. C., Guedes, M. J., Bachrach, D. G., & Cho, Y. (2025). A multidimensional quiet quitting scale: Development and test of a measure of quiet quitting. PLOS One, 20(4), e0317624. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317624 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Rafizah Abu Hassan, Hartini Saripan, Nurus Sakinatul Fikriah Mohd Shith Putera, Sarah Munirah Abdullah, & Ani Munirah Mohamad. (2023). Amendments to the Employment Act 1955: An analysis of the key changes with reference to international labour standards – A positive improvement for Malaysia’s employment regime? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(1), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i1/15568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Ratnatunga, J. (2022). Quiet quitting: The silent challenge of performance management.Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 20(2), 13–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Redman, A. (2022, September 8). Quiet quitting: Is this a new workplace phenomenon? Clevry. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. https://www.clevry.com/en/blog/quiet-quitting-is-this-a-new-workplace-phenomenon/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Rousseau, D. M. (2000). Psychological contract inventory: Technical report. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 21(5), 511–527. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Salleh, N. M. (2023). The employment contract in Malaysia: Challenges in regulating modern work practices. Malayan Law Journal, 3(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Schaufeli, W. (2021). Engaging leadership: How to promote work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754556 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2021). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(4), 517–537. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Serenko, A. (2024). The human capital management perspective on quiet quitting: Recommendations for employees, managers, and national policymakers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(1), 27–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2022-0792 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Shinners, R. (2023). Rethinking workplace silence: NDAs and employee well-being. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Employee Relations Law Journal, 48(3), 211–233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. (2020). UK employment flash. Retrieved from https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2020/11/uk-employment-flash [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Smith, A. (2021). Employment law and employee disengagement: Understanding the legal framework. Harvard Law Review, 134(5), 1356–1375. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3584994 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Starr, E., Sockin, J., & Sojourner, A. (2021). Non-disclosure agreements and externalities from silence. IZA Discussion Paper No. 14445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/262388/1/22-360.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Taylor, R. (2020). Quiet quitting: A shift in the way employees approach work. Labour Relations Journal, 42(4), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022216X20951800 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Teh, K. Z. W. (2024, April 22). The fine line between fiduciaries and employees. Thomas Philip Advocates and Solicitors. https://www.thomasphilip.com.my/articles/the-fine-line-between-fiduciaries-and-employ ees/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. The Guardian. (2024). Serco ordered to stop using facial recognition technology to monitor staff. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/feb/23/serco-ordered-to-stop-using-facial-re cognition-technology-to-monitor-staff-leisure-centres-biometric-data [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Trang, P. T., & Trang, N. T. T. (2024). Job burnout and quiet quitting in Vietnamese banking sector: The moderation effect of optimism. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1).https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2371549 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. UK Parliament. (2025, March 11). Employment Rights Bill [Debate transcript]. Hansard. UK Parliament. Retrieved from Hansard [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Weeks, K. (2011). The problem with work: Feminism, Marxism, antiwork politics, and postwork imaginaries. Duke University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Xueyun, Z., Al Mamun, A., Masukujjaman, M., et al. (2023). Modelling the significance of organizational conditions on quiet quitting intention among Gen Z workforce in an emerging economy. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 15438. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42591-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Zeilikman, J. (2022, September 12). An employment lawyer’s perspective on quiet quitting. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Zeilikman Law. https://www.zeilikmanlaw.com/an-employment-lawyers-perspective-on-quiet-quitting/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.