Minus Master: 3d MMOG Game-Based Learning for Improving Dyscalculia Subtraction Skills

Having strong math abilities is a necessary skill for a child to succeed and do well in school. It will present a challenge to students who struggle to process numbers and solve mathematical problems, such as children with dyscalculia. In order to solve this issue, this study offers Subtraction Quest, a 3D platformer game made especially to help children in the 8 to 9-year-old age range develop their subtraction abilities. The game offers a dynamic and entertaining learning experience by fusing entertaining gameplay with instructive materials. Subtraction Quest has two unique stages. The first stage will test players' comprehension of subtraction symbols, and the second will test them by having them answer word problems and basic arithmetic issues. Developed with Unity, the game makes use of educational psychology concepts to improve motivation and learning memory. The effectiveness of the game in enhancing students' subtraction abilities was evaluated through testing. System Usability Scale (SUS), along with pre- and post-tests, was employed to assess user satisfaction with the developed game and evaluate students’ performance following gameplay. The results indicate an increase in children's confidence and a strong desire to repeatedly engage with the game. Subtraction Quest can be a valuable tool for educators and parents who are trying to help their children who are having difficulty with this basic mathematical operation by making subtraction practice enjoyable and engaging. Future enhancements may include making the information more age-appropriate and extending the game's coverage of other arithmetic operations.

Quest, 3D Platformer game, Dyscalculia, Unity

1. B. Butterworth, S. Varma, and D. Laurillard, “Dyscalculia: from brain to education,” Science (1979), vol. 332, no. 6033, pp. 1049–1053, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. V. J. Shute and F. Ke, “Games, learning, and assessment,” in Assessment in game-based learning: Foundations, innovations, and perspectives, Springer, 2012, pp. 43–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. J. P. Gee, “What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy,” Computers in entertainment (CIE), vol. 1, no. 1, p. 20, 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. M. Sarı and S. Olkun, “The relationship between place value understanding, arithmetic performance and mathematics achievement,” vol. 18, pp. 951–958, Sep. 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. D. Geary, “Cognitive Predictors of Achievement Growth in Mathematics: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study,” Dev Psychol, vol. 47, pp. 1539–1552, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1037/a0025510. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. T. Kivirähk-Koor and E. Kiive, “Differences in Cognitive and Mathematical Skills of Students with a Mathematical Learning Disability and Those with Low Achievement in Mathematics: A Systematic Literature Review,” Educ Sci (Basel), vol. 15, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15030361. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. H. Fatwana, D. Dasari, and D. Juandi, “The use of learning aids for dyscalculia: systematic literature review,” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 639–652, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. F. Shute Valerie J. and Ke, “Games, Learning, and Assessment,” in Assessment in Game-Based Learning: Foundations, Innovations, and Perspectives, D. and G. X. Ifenthaler Dirk and Eseryel, Ed., New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012, pp. 43–58. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3546-4_4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. G. R. Morrison, S. J. Ross, J. R. Morrison, and H. K. Kalman, Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. J. Gee, “What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy,” Computers in Entertainment, vol. 1, p. 20, Sep. 2003, doi: 10.1145/950566.950595. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. L. Annetta, “Video Games in Education: Why They Should Be Used and How They Are Being Used,” Theory Into Practice - THEORY PRACT, vol. 47, pp. 229–239, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1080/00405840802153940. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. J. Hamari, D. Shernoff, B. Coller, J. Asbell-Clarke, and T. Edwards, “Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning,” Comput Human Behav, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. F. Ke, “A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay?,” Comput Educ, vol. 51, pp. 1609–1620, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. M. Prensky, “Digital Game-Based Learning,” McGraw-Hill, New York, vol. 1, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1145/950566.950567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. R. Siegler and J. Booth, “Development of Numerical Estimation in Young Children,” Child Dev, vol. 75, pp. 428–444, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00684.x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. N. Jordan and S. Levine, “Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young children,” Dev Disabil Res Rev, vol. 15, pp. 60–68, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1002/ddrr.46. R. Bartle, “Designing Virtual Worlds,” 2003, p. 768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. C. Steinkuehler and S. Duncan, “Scientific Habits of Mind in Virtual Worlds,” J Sci Educ Technol, vol. 17, pp. 530–543, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9120-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. C. I. Johnson and R. E. Mayer, “Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment,” Comput Human Behav, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1246–1252, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. D. Geary, “Mathematics and Learning Disabilities,” J Learn Disabil, vol. 37, pp. 4–15, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1177/00222194040370010201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. N. S. M. Rafee, N. Mohammed, and others, “A Case Study on Augmented Reality Applications for Chemistry Subject using Heuristic Evaluation,” Journal of Advanced Computing Technology and Application (JACTA), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 33–40, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. O. H. Jie, N. Mohammed, L. C. Feng, and others, “An Augmented Reality-based Solution for Visualization of Crystal Model and Composition to Improve Students’ Learning,” Journal of Advanced Computing Technology and Application (JACTA), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 25–32, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. V. Shute, M. Ventura, M. Bauer, and D. Zapata-Rivera, “Melding the Power of Serious Games and Embedded Assessment to Monitor and Foster Learning: Flow and Grow,” in Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects, vol. 1, 2009, pp. 295–321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. J. I. McSparron, A. Vanka, and C. C. Smith, “Cognitive learning theory for clinical teaching,” Clin Teach, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 96–100, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. J. R. Anderson, Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, 8th ed. Worth Publishers, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. J. Sweller, “Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning,” Cogn Sci, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 257–285, 1988. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. C.-C. Chang and S.-T. Yang, “Interactive effects of scaffolding digital game-based learning and cognitive style on adult learners’ emotion, cognitive load and learning performance,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 16, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00385-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. L. C. Heng and M. N. H. M. Said, “Effects of digital game-based learning apps based on Mayer’s cognitive theory of multimedia learning in mathematics for primary school students,” Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal (ITLJ), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65–78, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, vol. 86. Harvard university press, 1978. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. J. Piaget, “Science of education and the psychology of the child. Trans. D. Coltman.,” 1970. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. S. Kenaphoom, “Innovations in Education: Pathways to 21st Century Learning,” Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Innovation, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 46–57, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. T. NAKAHARA, “Study on Constructivist Teaching-Learning in Mathematics Education (I) : Constructivist Approach and Discovery Learning,” Journal of JASME : research in mathematics education, vol. 1, pp. 1–8, 1995, doi: 10.24529/jasme.1.0_1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. O. Suria, “A Statistical Analysis of System Usability Scale (SUS) Evaluations in Online Learning Platform,” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, vol. 6, pp. 2656–4882, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v6i2.750. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. J. Brooke and others, “SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale,” Usability evaluation in industry, vol. 189, no. 194, pp. 4–7, 1996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. J. Brooke, “SUS: a retrospective,” J Usability Stud, vol. 8, no. 2, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. J. Sauro and J. R. Lewis, Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study