Misrepresentation in Online Sales Transactions: A Comparative Study of Malaysian and UK Legal Frameworks

The growth of e-commerce has amplified the legal importance of misrepresentation in online sales transactions, given that contractual consent is increasingly derived through digital means. The lack of physical inspection, together with the lack of information on the applicable laws, raises concerns regarding the adequacy of existing legal framework to regulate misleading pre-contractual statements within the digital marketplace. This article explores how misrepresentation in online sales transactions is treated under both Malaysian and UK law. Adopting a doctrinal and comparative methodology, this paper analyses statutory provisions and established principles governing misrepresentation in online sales across both jurisdictions. The analysis reveals that while both legal systems acknowledge misrepresentation as a factor that can invalidate contractual consent, both coutries’ approaches differ significantly in terms of legal structure, categorisation and remedies applicable to the parties who consent was so caused. The UK framework which supported by the Misrepresentation Act 1967 and enhanced by consumer protection legislations reflects a more structured response to misrepresentation in online sales. Utilising the findings, this article offers recommendations to enhance Malaysian legal framework on misrepresentation in online sales transactions.

Misrepresentation; Online sales transactions; Commercial law

1. Alibeigi, A., & Munir, A. B. (2016). Electronic contracts, the Malaysian perspective. 10th International Conference on E Commerce in Developing Countries with Focus on E Tourism Ecdc 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECDC.2016.7492986 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andrews, N. (2016). Misrepresentation and Coercion. In Ius Gentium (Vol. 54). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27144-6_12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Billis, E. (2017). On the methodology of comparative criminal law research: Paradigmatic approaches to the research method of functional comparison and the heuristic device of ideal types. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24(6), 864–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X17745795 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Capper, D. (2010). Remedies for misrepresentation: An integrated system. In Commercial Contract Law Transatlantic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235662.023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chrissanthis, C. S. (2016). Online sales of insurance products in the EU. In Dematerialized Insurance Distance Selling and Cyber Risks from an International Perspective. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28410-1_6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Davies, P. S. (2016). Rescission for Misrepresentation. Cambridge Law Journal, 75(1), 15–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197316000131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Davis, J. (2019). The role of confusion in unfair competition law: A comparative perspective. In Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977999.00013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. de Almeida Leite, E. M., & Ramos Leite, M. A. (2025). Platform liability, free speech, and market fairness: transatlantic legal responses to commercial defamation and digital competition. International Review of Law Computers and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2025.2516967 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Edwards, L. (2005). The New Legal Framework for E-Commerce in Europe. In New Legal Framework for E Commerce in Europe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Eggers, P. M. (2016). Vitiation of contractual consent: First Edition. In Vitiation of Contractual Consent First Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315765563 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gan, S. W. (2010). E-commerce security: A comparative analysis of the law in the UK and Malaysia. Proc of the Iadis Int Conf E Commerce 2010 Proc of the Iadis Int Conf E Democracy Equity and Social Justice 2010 Part of the Mccsis 2010, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Giliker, P. (2017). The Consumer Rights Act 2015 – a bastion of European consumer rights? Legal Studies, 37(1), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/lest.12139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hyde, R. (2019). Students as consumers: Using student experiences to teach consumer contract law. In Reimagining Contract Law Pedagogy: A New Agenda for Teaching (pp. 99–111). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Idem, U. J., Olarinde, E. S., Anwana, E. O., Awoyemi, B. O., & Obieze, I. D.-D. (2024). Exploring the Legal Framework for E-Commerce in Nigeria with Insights from UK and Malaysia. 2024 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications Dasa 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA63652.2024.10836264 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jawahitha, S., & Mazahir, M. I. M. (2005). Online securities trading and control of securities offences in Malaysia. Proceedings International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling Control and Automation Cimca 2005 and International Conference on Intelligent Agents Web Technologies and Internet, 1, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Khubalkar, D. N., & Sharma, S. S. (2022). An exigency for consumer protection against counterfeit product marketing on the internet: a legislative perspective. International Journal on Consumer Law and Practice, 10, 63–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Klass, G. (2025). Misrepresentation. In Research Handbook on the Philosophy of Contract Law. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800885417.00035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Luzak, J. (2014a). Online consumer contracts. Era Forum, 15(3), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-014-0356-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Merkin, R., & Saintier, S. (2019). 14. Misrepresentation. 535–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198816980.003.0014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mohamad, A., Mohd Angsor, M. A., Mohd Adi, M. N., & Jia Min, A. T. (2025). Malaysia’s e-commerce landscape: legal structures and operational hurdles. Proceedings of SPIE the International Society for Optical Engineering, 13631. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3059023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mohanty, G., & Rai, G. (2022). The Hermeneutics of the Concept of Misrepresentation: Addressing the Quagmire of Damages and Compensation in Cases of Misrepresentation in Formation of a Contract Under Indian and English Law. Liverpool Law Review, 43(2), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-022-09303-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Narayanasamy, K., Jacobs, C. J. G. M. C. N., & Seyapalan, P. S. D. (2017). Legislating consumer law in Malaysia and the consumers’ apprehension. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(15), 135–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nik Mahmod, N. A. K., Ghani Azmi, I. M. A., Engku Ali, E. R. A., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Daud, M., & Napiah, M. D. M. (2017). An analysis of consensus Ad Idem: The Malaysian contract law and Shari’ah perspective. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(October), 73–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nuruddeen, M., & Yusof, Y. (2021). A comparative analysis of the legal norms for e-commerce and consumer protection. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics, 26, 22–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nwobodo, S., & Weissmann, M. A. (2023). Common Traits in Online Shopping Behavior: A Study of Different Generational Cohorts. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(3), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nyathi, M. (2023). Re-asserting the doctrinal legal research methodology in the south african academy: navigating the maze. South African Law Journal, 140, 365–386. https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v140/i2a5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Othman, Y., Mustaffa, M. S. A., Joni, E. K. E., Badrolhisam, N. I., Hasan, Z., & Ahmad, S. N. A. (2017). Online shopping: Consumers’ awareness of their rights and protection. Advanced Science Letters, 23(8), 7907–7910. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9606 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Pregoner, J. D., Opalla, I. L., Uy, J. D., & Palacio, M. (2020). Customers’ Perception on the Trustworthiness of Electronic Commerce: A Qualitative Study. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/msdpg [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Pu, J., Nian, T., Qiu, L., & Cheng, H. K. (2022). Platform Policies and Sellers’ Competition in Agency Selling in the Presence of Online Quality Misrepresentation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 39(1), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2021.2023410 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Rashid, N. I. M., & Razak, F. A. (2023). E-Commerce: Contract and Transaction. International Journal of Law Government and Communication, 8(31), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijlgc.831007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Seah, C. S., Loh, Y. X., Wong, Y. S., Jalaludin, F. W., & Loh, L. H. (2022). The Influence of COVID-19 Pandemic on Malaysian E-Commerce Landscape: The case of Shopee and Lazada. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1145/3537693.3537726 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sinani, B., & Mehmeti, S. (2025). The Importance of Comparative Law for the Development of Contemporary Law. Juridical Tribune Review of Comparative and International Law, 15(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.62768/TBJ/2025/15/1/01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Triasih, D., Heryanti, B. R., & Pujiastuti, E. (2019). Legal protection for consumers in buying agreements online. International Journal of Innovation Creativity and Change, 10(4), 127–142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Vallejo, A. O., & Ortega, P. V. (2025). Liability of online marketplaces in relation to the underlying contract: a confusing outlook in European Union law | Responsabilidad de los mercados en línea respecto del contrato subyacente: un confuso panorama en el derecho de la Unión Europea. Indret, 1, 74–96. https://doi.org/10.31009/InDret.2025.i1.03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. West, G. D., & Lewis Jr., W. B. (2009). Contracting to avoid extra-contractual liability-can your contractual deal ever really be the “entire” deal? Business Lawyer, 64(4), 999–1038. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Xu, Z.-X., Zhu, Y., & Yang, S. (2025). Tackling false advertising and strengthening consumer protection in emerging economies. Journal of General Management, 50(4), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070221145859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zeno, J. (2022). Information in Consumer Contracts: Reforming Consumer Protection Law in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 17(2), 242–267. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2022.18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.