Moderating Role of Chief Executive Officer Gender on the Relationship Between Audit Quality and Growth of Federal Teaching Hospitals in Nigeria

Audit Quality is a crucial instrument for ensuring transparency and accountability in both the public and private sectors. This study sought to investigate the moderating role of CEO gender on the relationship between audit quality and growth of federal teaching hospitals in Nigeria. The population of the study consists of twenty-one (21) federal teaching hospitals in Nigeria and the twenty (21) were selected as sample due to sparsity of data. Secondary data were collected from audited annual reports and accounts of the selected federal teaching hospitals from 2015 to 2022 and were analyzed using Residual Maximum Likelihood (REML) Estimate. Among the findings are that auditor’s knowledge has a positive significance on growth, while the auditor’s tenure is positively significant with growth. CEO gender, however, do not significantly moderate the relationship between audit tenure and growth as it does for auditor’s knowledge as a measure of audit quality. The study recommends that federal teaching hospitals in Nigeria should focus more on auditor’s knowledge or specialization in the public health sector when making decisions on appointment of external auditors.

Nigeria, growth, CEO gender, audit quality, federal teaching hospitals

1. Adams, M. B. (1994). Agency theory and the internal audit. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(8), 8–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Afifa, M. A., & Saleh, I. H. (2023). Does audit quality affect companies’ performance? Evidence from an emerging market. Ekonomski Pregled, 74(2), 208–232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Afza, T., & Nazir, M. S. (2014). Audit quality and firm value. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7(9), 1803–1810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al Ani, M. K., & Mohammed, Z. O. (2015). Auditor quality and firm performance: Omani experience. European Journal of Economics Finance and Administration Science, 74, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric analysis of panel data. (Springer Texts in Business and Economics). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Beatty, R. P. (1989). Auditor reputation and the pricing of initial public offerings. The Accounting Review, 64, 693. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chow, C. W. (1982). The demand for external auditing: Size, debt and ownership influences. The Accounting Review, 57, 272–291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), (1999). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Damagum, Y. M., Ayeni, A. A., & Obasa, R. S. (2021). An exploratory study of the nexus between corporate growth and corporate social responsibility spending: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies, 8(1), 16–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 183–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275–326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ding, W. W., Murray, F., & Stuart, T. E. (2013). From bench to board: Gender differences in university scientists’ participation in corporate scientific advisory boards. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1443–1464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ezejiofor, R. A., & Erhirhie, F. E. (2018). Effect of audit quality on financial performance: Evidence from deposit money banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 2(6), 1235–1244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Farouk, M. A., & Hassan, S. U. (2014). Impact of audit quality and financial performance of quoted cement firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 2(2), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Guedhami, O., Pittman, J. A., & Saffar, W. (2014). Auditor choice in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 107–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Gunn, J. L., Hallman, N., Li, C., & Pittman, J. (2017). The importance of information asymmetry to auditor choice, audit fees, and going concern opinions: Evidence from exploiting exogenous shifts in analyst coverage. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2967125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Heil, D. (2012). The influence of the auditor on the earnings quality of their clients [Master's thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam]. Erasmus University, Rotterdam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hu, D. (2015). Audit quality and measurement: Towards a comprehensive understanding. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 19(1), 209–222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Iliemena, R. O. C., & Okolocha, C. B. (2019). Effect of audit quality on financial performance: Evidence from a developing capital market. International Journal of Recent Research in Commerce Economics and Management, 6(3), 191–198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ivungu, J. A., Anande, K. G., & Ogirah, A. U. (2019). Effect of audit quality on performance: A review of literature. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research and Social and Management Sciences, 5(6), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Jeroh, E., Ekwueme, C. M., & Okoro, E. G. (2015). Corporate governance, financial performance and audit quality of listed firms in Nigeria. Journal of Academic Research in Economics, 7(2), 220–231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Khan, W. A., & Vieito, J. P. (2013). CEO gender and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 67, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Limperg, T., Flint, D., & Bak, G. G. M. (1985). The social responsibility of the auditor: A basic theory on the auditor’s function. Limperg Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Magnanelli, B. S., Nasta, L., & Pirolo, L. (2017). Preventing financial statement frauds through better corporate governance. Corporate Ownership and Control, 14(3), 271–285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Matoke, V., & Omwenga, J. (2016). Audit quality and financial performance of companies listed in Nairobi Securities Exchange. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 11, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mesbah, S. H., & Ramadan, M. M. (2022). The effect of audit quality on financial reporting quality. Alexandria Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 41–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Monametsi, G. L., & Agasha, E. (2020). Audit quality and firm performance: Evidence from Botswana and Uganda. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 6(4), 79–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Monye-Emina, H. E., & Jeroh, E. (2014). Determinants of the credibility of audit reports in the Nigerian insurance sector. Ilorin Journal of Management Sciences, 5(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Obafemi, T. O., Oyerinde, S. G., & Muhammed, K. S. (2023). Impact of audit quality on financial performance of banking industries in Nigeria. International Journal of Progressive Research in Engineering Management and Science, 3(1), 85–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ozegbe, K. K., & Jeroh, E. (2022). Audit quality and the financial performance of quoted companies in Nigeria: Empirical discourse. ACTA Universitatis Danubius, 18(5), 182–197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ramadhani, C., & Eliada, H. (2020). Factors that affect audit quality. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 2(1), 35–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Safdar, R., Chaudhry, N. I., Mirza, S. S., & Yu, Y. (2019). Principal–principal agency conflict and information quality in China: The governance role of audit quality and analyst following. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounts, 17(1), 42–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Santi, A., Dicky, & Dwiyanti, W. (2023). Review of audit quality indicators. International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics, 1(6), 737–742. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sarens, G., & Abdo, M. J. (2007). Agency theory as a predictor of the size of the internal audit function in Belgian companies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Shella, Y. A., & Ari, D. C. (2023). The influence of audit tenure and audit fees on audit quality with audit committee quality as a moderating variable. In International Conference on Innovations in Social Sciences Education and Engineering (pp. 1–17). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Siregar, S. V., & Nuryanah, S. (2019). Financial reporting quality, audit quality, and investment efficiency: Evidence from Indonesia. In ICTES. European Alliance for Innovation. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282299 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective revisited”: A reply. Organization Science, 15(3), 370–371. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Usman, S., Sohail, A. J., & Rashid, L. (2020). How audit quality affects the firm performance with the moderating role of the product market competition: Empirical evidence from Pakistani manufacturing firms. Sustainability, 12(10), 4153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Wang, G., Holmes Jr, R. M., Devine, R. A., & Bishoff, J. (2018). CEO gender differences in careers and the moderating role of country culture: A meta-analytic investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 148, 30–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Yayangida, A. S., Ahmed, M. N., Nyor, T., & Onipe, A. Y. (2023). Audit fees and the financial reporting quality of listed non-financial services firms in Nigeria: Moderating role of audit committee’s independence. African Journal of Management and Business Research, 10(1), 186–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zahid, R. M. A., Taran, A., Khan, M. K., & Chersan, I. C. (2022). ESG, dividend payout policy and the moderating role of audit quality: Empirical evidence from Western Europe. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(2), 350–367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Zhu, C., Husnain, M., Ullah, S., Khan, M. T., & Ali, W. (2022). Gender diversity and firms’ sustainable performance: Moderating role of CEO duality in emerging equity market. Sustainability, 14(12), 7177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127177 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors