Multimodality in Digital Collaboration: Exploring eTwinning in ITE for Enhancing Pre-Service Teachers’ Communication and Pedagogical Design
Authors
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje (North Macedonia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0740
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/26 | Page No: 9725-9738
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-04
Accepted: 2025-12-10
Published: 2025-12-16
Abstract
This paper investigates how multimodality functions within eTwinning projects in Initial Teacher Education (ITE) and how these practices prepare pre-service English language teachers for digitally connected and intercultural classrooms. The objectives of the study are to clarify how multimodal meaning-making is enacted through eTwinning collaboration, to analyze the support that eTwinning ITE Ambassadors and teacher educators provide, and to propose strategies for embedding multimodal project work into higher education curricula. This paper follows a conceptual and exploratory research design, drawing on social semiotics, sociocultural theory, and intercultural communicative competence. Through policy reports, peer reviewed studies and documented cases from European institutions it identifies patterns, challenges, and opportunities in current practice. It is shown that eTwinning projects generate rich multimodal artefacts, such as digital stories, infographics, virtual exhibitions, and collaborative videos. These tasks foster digital literacy, creativity, and intercultural awareness, and they give pre-service teachers hands on experience with tools and communication practices common in contemporary ELT. This paper further concludes that ITE Ambassadors and teacher educators play a decisive scaffolding role as they train students in multimodal tools, support pedagogical design, mediate intercultural communication, and help integrate eTwinning into course structures. Despite clear benefits, certain challenges do persist, including uneven digital competence, limited institutional support, superficial uses of multimodality, and restrictive curricula. The paper concludes that eTwinning offers a strong framework for integrating multimodal, collaborative, and intercultural pedagogy into teacher preparation. Lasting impact, however, depends on systematic curriculum integration, clear assessment criteria, and institutional recognition of ITE Ambassador and teacher educator roles. The study outlines future research needs and provides practical recommendations for strengthening multimodal eTwinning implementation in ITE.
Keywords
eTwinning; multimodality; initial teacher education
Downloads
References
1. Basantes, M. C. (2025). Adaptation of eTwinning in higher education: Its impact on English teaching: Adaptación De ETwinning En educación Superior: Su Impacto En La enseñanza Del inglés. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 6(1), 1695–1705. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v6i1.3445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Belic Malinić, S. (2025). Empowering eTwinning ambassadors: Unveiling teacher leadership perceptions. In Issues and trends in international school leadership (pp. 415–456). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cannelli, A. (2021). ICT and ELF: From apps to eTwinning. In ELF Pedagogy: A research study on ELT practices (pp. 103–115). Editoriale Anicia Sri. https://iris.unive.it/retrieve/e4239dde-84f5-7180-e053-3705fe0a3322/page%20proofs_ELF_book1.pdf#page=103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2016). Becoming little scientists: Technology-enhanced project-based language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 54–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. European Commission. (2013). Supporting Teacher Educators for Better Learning Outcomes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://school-education.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2024-04/Supporting-Teacher-Educators-for-better-learning-outcomes.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. European Commission. (2019a). Digital Education at School in Europe: Eurydice Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d7834ad0-ddac-11e9-9c4e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. European Commission. (2019b). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/297a33c8-a1f3-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1/language-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. European Commission. (2020). Digital Education Action Plan 2021–2027: Resetting Education and Training for the Digital Age. Publications Office of the European Union. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/plan [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. European Commission. (2021a). The European Education Area: Progress Report 2021. Publications Office of the European Union. https://education.ec.europa.eu/news/building-the-european-education-area-progress-report-published [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. European Commission. (2021b). Teachers in Europe: Careers, Development and Well-being: Eurydice Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/teachers_in_europe_2020_chapter_1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. European Commission. (2022a). Education and Training Monitor 2022: Comparative Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/cd653a8f-66f4-11ed-b14f-01aa75ed71a1/language-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. European Commission. (2022b). Progressing toward the European Education Area. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1da6d9cd-6703-11ed-b14f-01aa75ed71a1/language-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. European Commission. (2023a). Education and Training Monitor 2023: Comparative Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2d4c4524-8e68-11ee-8aa6-01aa75ed71a1/language-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. European Commission. (2023b). The Impact of eTwinning on Initial Teacher Education – Placing Teacher Educators and Student Teachers in the Spotlight: Full Monitoring Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2c9b900c-6e2d-11ee-9220-01aa75ed71a1/language-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. European Commission. (2024). Education and Training Monitor 2024: Comparative Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9637e78f-acc7-11ef-acb1-01aa75ed71a1/language-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Gilleran, A. (2019). eTwinning in an Era of Change – Impact on Teachers’ Practice, Skills, and Professional Development Opportunities, as Reported by eTwinners. Brussels: Central Support Service of eTwinning – European Schoolnet. https://etwinning.at/fileadmin/Dokumente/etwinning.at/Sonstiges/eTwinnnig_Summary_Report_2019.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Gülbay, E. (2018). eTwinning collaborative learning environment in initial teacher education. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 5(2), 5234–5242. https://www.ijarset.com/upload/2018/february/13-IJARSET-Ellifgulbay.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (Eds.). (2015). Developing online language teaching: Research-based pedagogies and reflective practices. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Muszyńska, B. (2022). The role of eTwinning tools in social and curriculum integration using multimodal communication. Teaching English with Technology, 22(2–3), 63–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J. (2023a). eTwinning and the development of language teachers’ digital literacy. ENSAYOS: Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete, 38(2), 86–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J. (2023b). Collaborative international online learning for the development of intercultural awareness. Journal for Multicultural Education, 18(1–2), 67–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Huertas-Abril, C. A., Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J., & Guardeño-Carrasquilla, M. A. (2025). eTwinning ambassadors’ perceptions about the use of eTwinning to improve EFL skills. rEFLections, 32(1), 356–373. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2020). Adding sense: Context and interest in a grammar of multimodal meaning. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Moeller, A. J., & Nugent, K. (2014). Unlock the gateway to communication: Building intercultural competence in the language classroom. University of Nebraska-Lincoln [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Napal-Fraile, M., Zudaire, M. I., Pétursdóttir, S., & Pavlin, J. (2024). eTwinning in science learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 567–582. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Paz-Albo, J., & López Cirugeda, I. (2017). Higher education perspectives on eTwinning. In INTED2017 Proceedings (pp. 1073–1076). IATED Academy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. The EVALUATE Group. (2019). Evaluating the impact of virtual exchange on initial teacher education. Research-publishing.net. https://research-publishing.net/book?10.14705/rpnet.2019.29.9782490057337 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Tosi, A. (Ed.). (2023). Empowering future teachers for a sustainable intercultural and inclusive education. Carocci editore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study