Nature Based-Science Instruction: A Systematic Literature Review on the Best Practices in Science Education

This systematic review analyses the importance and potential of best practices for nature-based science instruction in science education. Nature-based instruction refers to teaching practices that incorporate the natural environment through outdoor activities, environmental exploration, and interaction with nature. The study identifies effective strategies that enhance student learning by leveraging environmental contexts. Following PRISMA guidelines, 20 empirical studies published between 2013–2024 were analysed. Findings highlight inquiry-based learning, project-based learning, field trips, outdoor and garden-based learning, and nature-integrated classroom settings as best practices. Empirical evidence demonstrates that nature-based instruction fosters deeper scientific understanding, engagement, and environmental stewardship across diverse student populations. Implications are discussed for curriculum design, teacher preparation, and education policy.

Nature-based instruction, science education, outdoor learning, inquiry-based learning

1. Acar, H. 2014. Learning environments for children in outdoor spaces. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141: 846-853. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.147 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agostini, F., Minelli, M. & Mandolesi, R. 2018. Outdoor education in Italian kindergartens: How teachers perceive child developmental trajectories. Frontiers in psychology, 9 (1911). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01911 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amicone, G., Petruccelli, I., Dominicis, S.D., Gherardini, A., Costantino, V., Perucchini, P. & Bonaiuto, M. 2018. Green breaks: The restorative effect of the school environment’s green areas on children’s cognitive performance. Frontiers in psychology, 9 (1579). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01579 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aronsson, J., Waite, S. & Clark, M. 2015. Measuring the impact of outdoor learning on the physical activity of school age children: The use of accelerometry. Education and Health, 33 (3): 57-62. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318836910_Measuring_the_impact_of_outdoor_learning_on_the_physical_activity_of_school_age_children_The_use_of_accelerometry (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barfod, K.S. & Daugbjerg, P. 2018. Potentials in Udeskole: Inquiry-based teaching outside the classroom. Frontiers in Education, 3 (34). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00034 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Barnes, M.R., Donahue, M.L., Keeler, B.L., Shorb, C.M., Mohtadi, T.Z. & Shelby, L.J. 2019. Characterising nature and participant experience in studies of nature exposure for positive mental health: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 (2617). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02617 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chawla, L. 2015. Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of planning literature, 30 (4): 433-452. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595441 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dadvand, P., Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., Esnaola, M., Forns, J., Basagaña, X., Alvarez-Pedrerol, M. & Sunyer, J. 2015. Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112 (26): 7937-7942. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503402112 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dale, R.G., Powell, R.B., Stern, M.J. & Garst, B.A. 2020. Influence of the natural setting on environmental education outcomes. Environmental Education Research, 26(5): 613-631. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1738346 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dettweiler, U., Ünlü, A., Lauterbach, G., Becker, C. & Gschrey, B. 2015. Investigating the motivational behavior of pupils during outdoor science teaching within self-determination theory. Frontiers in psychology, 6 (125). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00125 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dettweiler, U., Lauterbach, G., Becker, C. & Simon, P. 2017. A bayesian mixed-methods analysis of basic psychological needs satisfaction through outdoor learning and its influence on motivational behavior in science class. Frontiers in psychology, 8 (2235). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.0223531 July 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hong, Q.N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P. & Pluye, P. 2018. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for information, 34 (4): 285-291. Retrieved from: 10.3233/EFI-180221 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jordan, C. & Chawla, L. 2022. A coordinated research agenda for nature-based learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 29-46. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00766 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jdaitawi, M. 2019. The effect of flipped classroom strategy on students learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 12 (3): 665-680. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12340a (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kuo, M., Browning, M.H. & Penner, M.L. 2018. Do lessons in nature boost subsequent classroom engagement? Refueling students in flight. Frontiers in psychology, 8 (2253). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02253 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kuo, M., Barnes, M. & Jordan, C. 2019. Do experiences with nature promote learning? Converging evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship. Frontiers in psychology, 10 (305). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00305 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kuo, M. & Jordan, C. 2019. The natural world as a resource for learning and development: From schoolyards to wilderness. Frontiers in psychology, 10 (1763). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01763 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. MacDonald, K. & Breunig, M. 2018. Back to the Garten: Ontario kindergarteners learn and grow through schoolyard pedagogy. Journal of outdoor and environmental education, 21: 133-151. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-018-0011-z (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Maryanti, R., Nandiyanto, A.B.D., Hufad, A. & Sunardi, S. 2021. Science education for students with special needs in Indonesia: From definition, systematic review, education system, to curriculum. Indonesian Journal of Community and Special Needs Education, 1 (1): 1-8. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/92b5/dc5b925f07fa18f086517886820fdc9198cd.pdf (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. McCullough, M.B., Martin, M.D. & Sajady, M.A. 2018. Implementing green walls in schools. Frontiers in psychology, 9 (619). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00619 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. McFarland, A.L., Glover, B.J., Waliczek, T.M. & Zajicek, J.M. 2013. The effectiveness of the national wildlife federation’s schoolyard habitat program: fourth-grade students’ standardized science test scores and science grades. HortTechnology, 23 (2): 187-193. Retreived from: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.23.2.187 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Miller, N.C., Kumar, S., Pearce, K.L. & Baldock, K.L. 2021. The outcomes of nature-based learning for primary school aged children: a systematic review of quantitative research. Environmental education research, 27 (8): 1115-1140. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1921117 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Selçuk, A.A. 2019. A guide for systematic reviews: PRISMA. Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, 57 (1): 57. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.5152%2Ftao.2019.4058 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Shaffril, H.A.M., Krauss, S.E. & Samsuddin, S.F. 2018. A systematic review on Asian's farmers' adaptation practices towards climate change. Science of the total Environment, 644: 683-695. Retrieved from: (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Szczytko, R., Carrier, S.J. & Stevenson, K.T. 2018. Impacts of outdoor environmental education on teacher reports of attention, behavior, and learning outcomes for students with emotional, cognitive, and behavioral disabilities. Frontiers in Education, 3 (46). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00046 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Williams, D. R. & Dixon, P.S. 2013. Impact of garden-based learning on academic outcomes in schools: Synthesis of research between 1990 and 2010. Review of educational research, 83 (2): 211-235. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313475824 (31 July 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study