On Ethical Decision-Making in Healthcare: The Tunisian Post-Revolution Context
Authors
Higher Institute of Management of Sousse, University of Sousse, Sousse (Tunisia)
Faculty of Economic Sciences and Management of Nabeul, University of Carthage, Nabeul (Tunisia)
Faculty of Economic Sciences and Management of Tunis, University of Tunis Al-Manar, Tunis (Tunisia)
College of Business Administration, Dar Al-Uloom University, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.917PSY0079
Subject Category: Psychology
Volume/Issue: 9/17 | Page No: 884-892
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-10
Accepted: 2025-12-16
Published: 2025-12-30
Abstract
This study examines ethical decision-making among physicians within the evolving Tunisian healthcare context, marked by rising healthcare expenditures, structural transitions, and the disruptive effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Ethical challenges in medical practice are amplified by the complexity of patient–provider interactions, the urgency of clinical decisions, and the sociocultural environment in which practitioners operate. While international literature provides extensive insights into ethics in marketing and management, empirical research focusing on medical ethics, particularly in North African contexts, remains limited. To address this gap, a qualitative exploratory study was conducted with 11 physicians representing diverse specialties, sectors, and professional backgrounds. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed through thematic content analysis to identify the variables influencing ethical decision-making. The findings reveal that medical ethics is perceived as a set of intrinsic values guiding physicians in navigating dilemmas under time-sensitive and high-stakes conditions. Two overarching categories of determinants emerged. Individual variables include academic background, experience, religiosity, personal values, socioeconomic conditions, emotional states, moral power, and all dimensions of moral intensity. Situational variables encompass professional dynamics such as peer support and interpersonal relationships, organizational resources and culture, and external influences including patients, families, social norms, and the judicial and industrial environments. Several novel factors, particularly personal values, socioeconomic pressures, organizational resource constraints, and judicial influence, highlight the specificity of the Tunisian context. The study contributes a contextualized framework for understanding ethical decision-making among healthcare providers. It offers practical implications for communication strategies, organizational leadership, and ethical governance, while emphasizing the need for future quantitative investigations to validate and extend these findings.
Keywords
Ethics, ethical decision-making
Downloads
References
1. Abrantes, J. A., Ferreira, F. A., Zopounidis, C., Pereira, L. F., & Meidutė‐Kavaliauskienė, I. (2022). Analyzing ethical practices in the public healthcare sector using fuzzy cognitive mapping. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 29(1-2), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1729 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alas, Ruth. "Ethics in countries with different cultural dimensions: Ruth Alas." Journal of Business Ethics 69.3 (2006): 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9088-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Association Médicale Mondiale. (2015). WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ben Amor, F. (2021). La prise de décision éthique dans les services de soins médicaux : Une étude qualitative (Mémoire de master). Université de Carthage, Tunisie. https://doi.org/10.60713/pist-196619 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ben Amor, F., Dakoumi Hamrouni, A., & Dellagi, H. (2025a). The trust in doctors’ dilemma: Investigating the role of patients’ perceived communication. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), 12(11), 218-236. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12110016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ben Amor, F., Dakoumi Hamrouni, A., & Dellagi, H. (2025b). 66 Years of Religious Research in Marketing: What Does Literature Have to Reveal?. Scientific Culture, 11, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17753387 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Boisvert, Y., & Bégin, L. (2019). Public sector facing systemic corruption: Moral weakness and organisational vulnerability. Revue française d'administration publique, (3), 767-780. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfap.171.0767 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Briscoe, F., Chin, M. K., & Hambrick, D. C. (2014). CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1786-1809. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0255 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Wadsworth, L. L. (2009). The impact of moral intensity dimensions on ethical decision-making. Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(4), 534-551. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Deshpande, S. P., Joseph, J., & Shu, X. (2011). Ethical climate and managerial success in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4), 527-534. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024198904265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Diogo, J., & Veiga, P. (2022). Consumer behavior: A literature review of the early research on the COVID-19 outbreak. International Journal of Marketing, Communication and New Media, 62-91. https://doi.org/10.54663/2182-9306.2022.sn11.62-91 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ferrell, O. C., Harrison, D. E., Ferrell, L., & Hair, J. F. (2019). Business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and brand attitudes: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 95, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. He, H., & Harris, L. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of Business Research, 116, 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Heyler, S. G., Armenakis, A. A., Walker, A. G., & Collier, D. Y. (2016). A qualitative study investigating the ethical decision making process: A proposed model. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(5), 788-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. JournalofMacromarketing, 6(1),5-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/027614678600600103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. https://doi.org/10.1177/027614678600600103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366-395. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Kreitmair, K. V. (2021). Medical ethics, moral courage, and the embrace of fallibility. Academic Medicine, 96(12), 1630-1633. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Lebeau, J. P., Aubin-Auger, I., Cadwallader, J. S., de la Londe, J. G., Lustman, M., Mercier, A., ... & Groupe universitaire de recherche qualitative médicale francophone. (2021). Initiation à la recherche qualitative en santé: le guide pour réussir sa thèse ou son mémoire. Global media santé. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Li, Y., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Ahlstrom, D. (2020). The rationality of emotions: A hybrid process model of decision-making under uncertainty. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09684-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. McDevitt, R., Giapponi, C., & Tromley, C. (2007). A model of ethical decision making: The integration of process and content. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(2), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9202-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Quivy, R. et Van Campenhoudt, L. (1995). Manuel de recherche en sciences sociales (2e éd.). Paris : Dunod. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. Praeger. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Silverman, H., Wilson, T., Tisherman, S., Kheirbek, R., Mukherjee, T., Tabatabai, A., ... & Zimmer, M. (2022). Ethical decision-making climate, moral distress, and intention to leave among ICU professionals in a tertiary academic hospital center. BMC medical ethics, 23(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00775-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Tønnessen, S., Ursin, G., & Brinchmann, B. S. (2017). Care-managers’ professional choices: ethical dilemmas and conflicting expectations. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 630. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2578-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership : Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human relations, 56(1), 5-37 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056001448 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Trevino, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2014). (Un)ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 635–660. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. WHO. (2019). Global Spending on Health: A World in Transition. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. WHO. (2022). Global Health Expenditure Report. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Zyung, J. D., Mittal, V., Kekre, S., Hegde, G. G., Shang, J., Marcus, B. S., & Venkat, A. (2020). Service providers’ decision to use ethics committees and consultation in complex services. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(2), 278-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719898495 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
- Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
- A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
- Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
- A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being