Overcoming Mathematics Anxiety Through Digital Game-Based Learning: Bridging Cognitive Engagement and Emotional Confidence

Mathematics anxiety has long been identified as a psychological barrier that undermines students’ confidence, motivation, and academic performance. Traditional interventions have focused primarily on pedagogical modifications and affective counseling, yet technological innovations now present new opportunities for addressing the emotional dimensions of learning mathematics. Digital Game-Based Learning (DGBL) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance engagement, self-efficacy, and conceptual understanding while reducing anxiety. This paper examines the role of DGBL in mitigating mathematics anxiety through cognitive, emotional, and behavioral mechanisms. By integrating findings from prior studies on game-based learning, digital engagement, and mathematics pedagogy, it proposes a conceptual model illustrating how interactive, feedback-driven learning environments can transform students’ attitudes toward mathematics. Recommendations for educators and researchers are discussed to guide future implementations of DGBL in mathematics education.

Mathematics anxiety, digital game-based learning

1. Serin, H. (2023). Mathematics Anxiety: Overcoming Challenges and Achieving Success. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies, 10(2), 383–389. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Zheng, Y., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Wu, X., Ding, R., Luo, X., Liu, P., & Huang, J. (2024). Effects of Digital Game-Based Learning on Students’ Digital Etiquette Literacy, Learning Motivations, and Engagement. Heliyon, 10, e23490. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Wardoyo, C., Satrio, Y. D., & Ma’ruf, D. (2020). Effectiveness of Game-Based Learning – Learning in Modern Education. KnE Social Sciences, 4(7), 81–87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
• Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
• Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
• Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
• Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet