Ownership Structure, Board Diversity and Firm Performance: A Moderated Mediation Approach

Authors

Suriani Sukri

Faculty of Business and Communication, University Malaysia Perlis, Kampus UniCITI Alam, Sungai Chuchuh 02100 Padang Besar, Perlis, Malaysia. (Malaysia)

Waeibrorheem Waemustafa

School of Economic, Finance and Banking, University Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Sharifah Raudzah S Mahadi

College of Creative Arts, University Technology MARA Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610 Perak, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000818

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 10040-10062

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-07

Accepted: 2025-11-14

Published: 2025-11-25

Abstract

This study examines how ownership structure influences firm performance in Malaysia’s manufacturing sector, focusing on the mediating role of board gender diversity and the moderating effect of board independence. Using panel data from 2015–2023 for public-listed manufacturing companies, the study investigate institutional, family, and managerial ownership impacts on performance (measured by ROA, ROE, and Tobin’s Q). The Malaysian context of concentrated family ownership and evolving corporate governance norms provides a rich setting. The study employs panel regression analyses and a moderated mediation framework. The results indicate that institutional ownership is positively associated with firm performance, whereas family and managerial ownership show negative effects. Board gender diversity emerges as a positive predictor of performance, mediating part of the ownership–performance relationship. Notably, board independence strengthens the performance impact of board diversity – firms with more independent boards derive greater performance gains from diverse boards. This suggests a moderated mediation: ownership influences performance through diversity, conditional on independent board oversight. The findings underscore the business case for improving board diversity and maintaining strong independent director presence. The study contributes to corporate governance literature by integrating ownership structure, diversity, and independence in a single framework, and the study offer practical recommendations for regulators and firms to enhance governance structures for better performance.

Keywords

Ownership structure, board diversity, gender diversity, board independence

Downloads

References

1. Ab Aziz, N. H., Abdul Latiff, A. R., Osman, M. N. H., & Alshdaifat, S. M. (2025). The interaction effect of family ownership, board gender and skills on CSR strategy with ESG performance: Evidence from ASEAN-5 countries. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 25(4), 948-961. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdullah, S. N., Aziz, A., & Azani, A. (2022). The Effect of Board Independence, Gender Diversity and Board Size on Firm Performance in Malaysia. Journal of Social Economics Research, 9(4), 179–192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aguilera, R. V., Talaulicar, T., Chung, C. N., Jimenez, G., & Goel, S. (2015). Special issue on “cross‐national perspectives on ownership and governance in family firms”. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(3), 161-166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta‐analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428-442. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P., & Lang, L. H. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The journal of finance, 57(6), 2741-2771. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gharbi, S., & Othmani, H. (2021). Family ownership and R&D investment: the moderating role of institutional investors. International Journal of Corporate Governance, 12(2), 185-207. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Institute of Corporate Directors Malaysia (ICDM). (2023, March 1). ICDM Launches the First Malaysia Board Diversity Study and Index (Press Release). Kuala Lumpur: ICDM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In Corporate governance (pp. 77-132). Gower. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jusoh, M. A. (2016). Equity ownership and firm performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(11), 423–435. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ling, L. Y. H., Jong, L. C., Law, W., & Chieng, F. (2023). Family director board governance index: An analysis of family directors and firm performance in Malaysia. Journal of General Management, 48(4), 281–295. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of financial economics, 20, 293-315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate behavioral research, 42(1), 185-227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sahu, M., Alahdal, W. M., Pandey, D. K., Baatwah, S. R., & Bajaher, M. S. (2025). Board gender diversity and firm performance: Unveiling the ESG effect. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100493. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Uribe-Bohorquez, M. V., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2018). Board independence and firm performance: The moderating effect of institutional context. Journal of Business Research, 88, 28–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of management studies, 45(1), 196-220. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles