Physical Fitness Among Firefighters through Innovative Human Resource Management Approaches: A Case Study in Zone 1, Fire and Rescue Department of Malaysia, Melaka State

Authors

Rahizam bi Ruzali

Fakulti Pengurusan Teknologi dan Teknousahawanan, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (Malaysia)

Mohd Fauzi bin Kamarudin

Fakulti Pengurusan Teknologi dan Teknousahawanan, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.92800038

Subject Category: Human Resource Management

Volume/Issue: 9/28 | Page No: 391-402

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-11

Accepted: 2025-11-17

Published: 2025-12-20

Abstract

Purpose – This study investigates how innovative human resource management (HRM) approaches can optimize physical fitness among firefighters in Zone 1, Fire and Rescue Department of Malaysia, Melaka State. Recognizing the physically and mentally demanding nature of firefighting, the study explores current fitness levels, existing HRM practices, and innovative strategies that can enhance firefighters’ resilience and performance.
Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative case study design was adopted, employing semi- structured interviews and focus group discussions with 15–20 firefighters of different roles, ages, and backgrounds. Participants were selected using purposive sampling to capture diverse perspectives. Data were analyzed thematically, supported by triangulation through document reviews and observational insights. The Social Ecological Framework guided the interpretation of findings by examining how individual, interpersonal, organizational, and policy factors interact to influence physical fitness.
Findings – Preliminary findings suggest that while firefighters demonstrate strong commitment to fitness, challenges such as irregular work schedules, limited organizational support, and inconsistent program evaluation hinder sustained outcomes. Existing HRM practices, including training modules and wellness programs, provide a foundation but lack innovation and adaptability to firefighters’ unique operational demands. Anticipated results highlight the need for more structured and personalized fitness initiatives, technology integration (e.g., wearable monitoring tools), motivational incentives, and a supportive organizational culture. These innovations are expected to strengthen not only physical capacity but also holistic well-being, including mental resilience.
Practical implications – The study is expected to contribute actionable recommendations for HRM innovation within Malaysian firefighting services. By emphasizing comprehensive fitness strategies, the research provides insights that may inform organizational policy, improve workforce readiness, and reduce occupational risks.
Originality/value – This study extends the application of the Social Ecological Framework to the firefighting profession in Malaysia, offering a contextualized understanding of how multilevel HRM strategies can enhance physical fitness. The findings aim to bridge gaps in current practices and propose a sustainable, innovative HRM model for firefighter well-being.

Keywords

physical fitness, firefighters, innovative HRM

Downloads

References

1. Ahmad, R. & Mohd Noor, A., 2021. Strategi Pengurusan Sumber Manusia Dalam Sektor Pekerjaan Berisiko Tinggi di Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aziz, R. & Mokhtar, H., 2020. Transformasi skim perkhidmatan badan beruniform di Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Public Administration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bashan, G. et al., 2020. Firefighter Fitness and Its Relation to Operational Performance. Journal of Physical Education Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, J. & Zuckerman, S., 2022. Occupational health in high-risk industries: Applying social ecological theory to enhance fitness. Workplace Health & Safety, 70(3), pp. 121–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Frank, E., 2024. Social Ecological Factors Influencing Participation in Workplace Health Promotion Programming among University Employees. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fried, Y., Slowik, L.H. & Ben-David, H., 2020. Physical fitness and workplace productivity: A review of current perspectives. Journal of Occupational Health, 62(1), pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ganesh, S. & Subramanian, K., 2021. Innovative HR Practices for Employee Well-being. Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(2), pp. 55–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gledhill, N. & Jamnik, V.K., 2020. Physical fitness standards for firefighters: A review. Journal of Occupational Medicine. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ismail, M. et al., 2021. Kecergasan fizikal dalam kalangan pegawai bomba di Malaysia: Satu tinjauan. Journal of Occupational Safety and Health Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jabatan Bomba dan Penyelamat Malaysia (JBPM), 2022. Laporan Tahunan Jabatan Bomba dan Penyelamat Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jones, A., Taylor, B. & Green, C., 2023. The Role of Technology in Enhancing Physical Fitness in Emergency Services. International Journal of Health Technology, 12(3), pp. 56–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M. & Kangasniemi, M., 2016. Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), pp. 2954–2965. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Korre, M. et al., 2019. Obesity and physical fitness in public safety personnel. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lee, Y. & Park, S., 2021. Understanding of Physical Activity in Social Ecological Perspective: Application of Multilevel Model. Frontiers in Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. McGowan, J., Cross, M. & Johnson, P., 2022. Physical Fitness in High-Risk Occupations: A Systematic Review. Occupational Health & Safety Journal, 39(3), pp. 18–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. McLeroy, K.R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A. & Glanz, K., 1988. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), pp. 351–377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. & Saldaña, J., 2020. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 4th ed. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E. & Moules, N.J., 2017. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Peate, W.F. et al., 2021. Fitness programs in fire services: Innovations and challenges. Journal of Occupational Health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Petersen, C., Taylor, J. & Prati, G., 2022. Fitness in High-Risk Occupations: A Comprehensive Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Occupational Health Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Saunders, B. et al., 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), pp. 1893–1907. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Smith, J., Stevens, R. & Taylor, A., 2021. Barriers to Physical Fitness Maintenance in High-Risk Occupations: A Qualitative Review. Journal of Occupational Studies, 18(1), pp. 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Taylor, B. & Green, C., 2021. Physical Fitness in Firefighting: Challenges and Interventions. Fire and Rescue Journal, 14(3), pp. 100–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tracy, S.J., 2020. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Yu, X. et al., 2022. Barriers to Physical Fitness Among Emergency Responders in Asia. Journal of Occupational Health. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ahmed, R. & Noor, F., 2023. Innovative Approaches to Human Resource Management in High-Risk Occupations. Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, 35(2), pp. 112-125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Al-Hakim, A., et al. (2022). 'The impact of workplace wellness programs on employee health and productivity: A comprehensive review', Journal of Occupational Health, 27(3), pp. 85-98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Back, D., et al. (2023). 'The role of participant feedback in optimizing fitness programs for high-risk occupations', Occupational Health Review, 31(4), pp. 302-314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Barros, P., Zahra, F. & Chen, L. (2023). 'Psychological and environmental barriers to fitness in high stress professions: A study of firefighters', Occupational Health & Safety Journal, 39(3), pp. 190-210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Baur, D.M., Mathews, S. & Walters, T.J. (2021). 'Obesity and injury risk in physically demanding occupations: Insights from firefighting professions', Occupational Health & Safety, 63(2), pp. 120129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Beck, R.T., Stevenson, A. & Norris, J. (2022). 'Diabetes risk and physical fitness: Implications for high- risk professions', Journal of Occupational Health, 44(3), pp. 215-226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Blevins, S., Ward, R. & Oldenburg, B. (2020). 'Access to fitness facilities and its influence on firefighter physical activity', International Journal of Workplace Health, 39(4), pp. 287-299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Bashan, G., et al. (2020). 'Firefighter fitness and its relation to operational performance', Journal of Physical Education Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Barr, R.D., Stevenson, A. & Norris, J. (2022). 'Physical and cardiovascular demands of firefighting: Implications for occupational fitness standards', Journal of Applied Physiology, 130(3), pp. 589-596. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Barros, P., Zahra, F. & Chen, L. (2023). 'Impact of cultural and environmental factors on fitness maintenance among firefighters', International Journal of Workplace Health, 39(4), pp. 287-299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Baur, D.M., Mathews, S. & Walters, T.J. (2021). 'Obesity and injury risk in physically demanding occupations: Insights from firefighting professions', Occupational Health & Safety, 63(2), pp. 120-129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Baik, D. & Famularo, R. (2024). 'Work-life balance as a key component of employee wellness: A global perspective', International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 17(2), pp. 110-124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Blevins, S., Ward, R. & Oldenburg, B. (2020). 'Barriers to effective fitness programs for firefighters: A review of global practices', Occupational Medicine and Safety Journal, 48(1), pp. 122-131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Beck, R.T., Stevenson, A. & Norris, J. (2022). 'Diabetes risk and physical fitness: Implications for high- risk professions', Journal of Occupational Health, 44(3), pp. 215-226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Blevins, S., Ward, R. & Postlethwaite, L. (2023). 'Physical fitness requirements and firefighter performance: A global perspective', International Journal of Occupational Health, 34(2), pp. 195-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Barros, P., Zahra, F. & Chen, L. (2023). 'Psychological and environmental barriers to fitness in highstress professions: A study of firefighters', Occupational Health & Safety Journal, 39(3), pp. 190-210. 44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Chen, L. & Zuckerman, B. (2022). 'Workplace health strategies: Applying social ecological models', Journal of Workplace Health Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Creswell, J.W. & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 4th ed. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Cummings, J., et al. (2023). 'The role of wearable fitness trackers in improving firefighter physical health', Journal of Occupational Health, 61(2), pp. 120-132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Chang, C., Smith, D. & Lin, S. (2022). 'Human resource management in emergency services: Strategies for enhancing performance and well-being', Journal of Emergency Management, 39(4), pp. 325-338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Chan, T., Li, F. & Zhao, X. (2022). 'Holistic wellness programs in emergency services: Enhancing mental resilience and physical performance', Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, 45(3), pp. 211224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Chang, C., Lee, S. & Kim, J. (2022). 'Technology-enhanced fitness programs for emergency responders: A strategic approach', Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, 38(3), pp. 189-203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Chatzisarantis, N.L. & Hagger, M.S. (2007). 'Promoting physical fitness in the workplace: The role of self- determined motivation', International Journal of Occupational Health, 24(3), pp. 234-247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Dhiman, S., et al. (2020). 'Wearable fitness devices in emergency services: Enhancing physical readiness through technology', Journal of Emergency Management, 42(5), pp. 312-324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Frank, E. (2024). 'Social ecological factors influencing participation in workplace health promotion programming among university employees', Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Fried, Y., Slowik, L.H. & Ben-David, H. (2020). 'Physical fitness and workplace productivity: A review of current perspectives', Journal of Occupational Health, 62(1), pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Flessa, S. & Huebner, L. (2021). 'Personalized fitness programs for high-risk professions: The case of emergency services', Journal of Occupational Health and Safety Management, 34(5), pp. 342-355. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Ganesh, S. & Subramanian, K. (2021). 'Innovative HR practices for employee well-being', Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(2), pp. 55–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Hwang, C. & Lee, B. (2023). 'Personalized training programs for emergency service personnel: Role of wearable devices and fitness apps', Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 30(1), pp. 58-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Jones, M. & Williams, L., 2022. Cardiovascular stress and physical fitness in firefighting: A critical review. International Journal of Fire Service Management, 45(3), pp. 210-225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles