Polling Perspectives: Factors Influencing the Voting Decision of Senior High School First-Time Voters

First-time voters play a crucial role in shaping the democratic landscape, reflecting the evolving political awareness of the youth. This quantitative-descriptive study examined the factors influencing the voting decisions of first-time Senior High School voters at Dapa National High School (SY 2025–2026), focusing on peer influence, family influence, political party affiliation, media exposure, and school influence, as well as variations across age, sex, track, and socioeconomic status. A validated survey was administered to 253 respondents selected via stratified random sampling. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson’s r correlation. Results indicated that family income significantly influenced political party affiliation (p = 0.019), while media exposure positively correlated with party affiliation (r = 0.247, p < 0.001). A strong correlation between family and school influence (r = 1.000, p < 0.001) highlighted the complementary roles of home and education in civic formation. Findings suggest that socioeconomic status and media engagement significantly shape young voters’ political orientations, emphasizing the need for enhanced media literacy, civic education, and family involvement to nurture informed and responsible first-time voters.

First-time Voters, Political Engagement, Media Exposure

1. Ahmad Said, F. B. (2019). Political marginalization of youth as a driver for violent extremism–Examining the case of Jordan (Master’s thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Istanbul, Turkey). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Allam, S. N. S., Hassan, M. S., & Abdul Rauf Ridzuan, A. R. (2021). How media literacy competency contribute to political participation integrity among young people. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(4), 814–832. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alodat, A. M., Al-Qora’n, L. F., & Abu Hamoud, M. (2023). Social media platforms and political participation: A study of Jordanian youth engagement. Social Sciences, 12(7), 402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alscher, P., Graf, E., & McElvany, N. (2025). Political participation and the Civic Voluntarism Model: How do resources, psychological engagement, and recruitment shape willingness to participate during adolescence? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alscher, P., Ludewig, U., & McElvany, N. (2022). Civic education, teaching quality and students’ willingness to participate in political and civic life: Political interest and knowledge as mediators. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(10), 1886–1900. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Arkorful, V. E., Lugu, B. K., Basiru, I., Hammond, A., Arkorful, V. E., & Budu, G. (2020). Voter's choice of a presidential candidate: An empirical study. Journal of Public Affairs, e2576. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Arshad, S., & Khurram, S. (2020). Can government’s presence on social media stimulate citizens’ online political participation? Investigating the influence of transparency, trust, and responsiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 37, Article 101486. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ballard, P. J., Hoyt, L. T., & Pachucki, M. C. (2019). Impacts of adolescent and young adult civic engagement on health and socioeconomic status in adulthood. Child Development, 90(4), 1138–1154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bayog, A. J. (2025, May 15). Youth vote drives 81.65% turnout, record high for midterm elections – COMELEC. ABS-CBN News. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Celestial, A. J. (2022, May 1). Shading for a better tomorrow: The youth’s role in the upcoming national elections. Atenews. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). (2025). Gender differences in voter turnout. Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University-New Brunswick. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chu, T. H., & Yeo, T. E. D. (2020). Rethinking mediated political engagement: Social media ambivalence and disconnective practices of politically active youths in Hong Kong. Chinese Journal of Communication, 13(2), 148–164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Diaz Ruiz, C. A. (2025). Market-oriented disinformation research: Digital advertising, disinformation and fake news on social media. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Early, A. S., Smith, E. L., & Neupert, S. D. (2022). Age, education, and political involvement differences in daily election-related stress. Current Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fan, F., Chan, K., Wang, Y., Li, Y., & Prieler, M. (2023). How influencers’ social media posts have an influence on audience engagement among young consumers. Young Consumers, 24(4), 427–444. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Janmaat, J. G., & Hoskins, B. (2022). The changing impact of family background on political engagement during adolescence and early adulthood. Social Forces, 101(1), 227–251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kaskazi, A., & Kitzie, V. (2023). Engagement at the margins: Investigating how marginalized teens use digital media for political participation. New Media & Society, 25(1), 72–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kenna, J. L., & Hensley, M. A. (2019). Utilizing social media to promote civic engagement in the social studies classroom. The Social Studies, 110(2), 86–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Levinsen, K., & Yndigegn, C. (2015). Political discussions with family and friends: Exploring the impact of political distance. The British Journal of Sociology, 66(3), 547–567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Moon, S. J., & Bai, S. Y. (2020). Components of digital literacy as predictors of youth civic engagement and the role of social media news attention: The case of Korea. Journal of Children and Media, 14(4), 458–474. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nelson, M. H. (2023). Explaining socioeconomic disparities in electoral participation: The role of health in the SES-voting relationship. Social Science & Medicine, 320, Article 115718. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Omotayo, F., & Folorunso, M. B. (2020). Use of social media for political participation by youths. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 12(1), 132–157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Serra, L. (2025). The impact of party appeals on age differences in voting. Electoral Studies, 96, 102942. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Siegel-Stechler, K., Hayat, N., & Medina, A. (2025, March 10). A sense of belonging and a positive school climate are key to building youth political efficacy. CIRCLE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Truax, K. J. (2023). An examination of parental transmission on young voters’ political party affiliation, parenting style mediations (Undergraduate thesis, DePauw University). DePauw [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zagidullin, M., Aziz, N., & Kozhakhmet, S. (2021). Government policies and attitudes to social media use among users in Turkey: The role of awareness of policies, political involvement, online trust, and party identification. Technology in Society, 67, Article 101708. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zainurin, S. J., Wan Husin, W. N., Zainol, N. M., & Ismail, A. (2023). Peers influence on youth political behavior: A systematic review. International Journal of Social Sciences and Research, 11(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study