Profound Implications of Aristotelianism and Structural Functionalism in Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program under Revised K to 12 Curriculum in Contemporary Governance

This systematic review investigates the profound implications of Aristotelianism and Structural Functionalism in the governance and administration of education policies and programs under the Revised K to 12 Curriculum, particularly focusing on the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) program. It synthesizes contemporary literature to explore how Aristotelianism emphasizes moral character, virtue, and participatory citizenship as vital values guiding decision-making processes in educational governance. From an Aristotelian perspective, effective educational leadership arises from cultivating ethical dispositions that prioritize the common good, justice, and collective well-being.
Meanwhile, structural functionalism highlights the significance of interdependent roles, organizational efficiency, and social stability within educational systems. It also emphasizes how governance structures, institutional policies, and administrative mechanisms contribute to maintaining equilibrium and ensuring the effective delivery of educational programs. Within the ARAL framework, this theoretical perspective explains how collaboration among administrators, teachers, and stakeholders strengthens system functionality and responsiveness to students’ learning needs.
The review features the complementary nature of these theoretical frameworks in influencing both the ethical and operational aspects of educational governance. Empirical findings show that when moral leadership and functional efficiency converge, educational reforms become more sustainable, inclusive, and aligned with national learning goals. At the right time, the integration of Aristotelian and Structural-Functionalist perspectives provides a strong theoretical foundation for advancing governance practices that promote academic recovery, equitable access, and holistic student development under the evolving K to 12 frameworks.

Aristotelianism, Structural-Functionalism

1. Asuncion, A. B. (2025). Structural functionalism and educational recovery: The sociology of the ARAL Program. Philippine Journal of Educational Development, 15(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bajo, N. (2025). National learning recovery initiatives in the Philippines. Philippine Education Journal, 12(1), 45-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cambridge Handbook of Democratic Education. (2023). Aristotle on education, democracy, and civic friendship. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Department of Education (DepEd). (2024). Implementing guidelines of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning Program. DepEd Memorandum No. 018, s. 2024. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2025/06/13/june-13-2025-do-018-s-2025-implementing-guidelines-of-the-academic-recovery-and-accessible-learning-program/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Education (DepEd). (2025). Implementation of the ARAL Program for learning recovery in basic education [DepEd Memorandum No. 32, s. 2025]. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Education Planning and Development Office. (2025). Quality Basic Education Development Plan 2025–2035. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of Education, Philippines. (2024). Implementing Rules and Regulations of the ARAL Program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/IRR-of-ARAL-Program-Act.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department of Education. (2024). Annual report on the implementation of the Revised K to 12 Curriculum and ARAL Program. Department of Education, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Department of Education. (2024). Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program guidelines. DepEd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ijaz, M., Lu, X., & Santos, R. (2025). Aristotelian ethics and moral education. Journal of Educational Philosophy, 29(3), 210-228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Legget, B. (2004). Structural functionalism. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lu, Y. C. (2024). The compatibility of character education and citizenship education in Aristotelian theory. Journal of Moral Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2024.2354746 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Malipot, M. (2025). Addressing literacy gaps through ARAL. Philippine Basic Education Review, 7(2), 72-89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Miller, M. O. (2023). Neo-Aristotelian character education: The integration of moral and intellectual virtues in learning. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nickerson, C. (2024). Structural Functionalism in Educational Systems. Educational Theory. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nickerson, R. (2024). Structural functionalism in contemporary education systems. Sociology of Education Quarterly, 58(4), 330-348. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Reviews of school resources: School governance and effectiveness. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Republic Act No. 12028. An Act Establishing an Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program and Appropriating Funds Therefor. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. School Governance Literature Review. (2025). A systematic review of governance literature in education policy and administration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Smith, J. P. (2025). School governance reforms and learning recovery: Localized management in post-pandemic education. Journal of Educational Governance and Policy, 38(1), 23–41 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Smith, R. (2024). Foundations of sociology: Structural functionalism. Sociology Today. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Supriadi, R. (2021). Education governance and structural functionalism: A Southeast Asian perspective. International Journal of Educational Development, 68, 101-116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Taylor, J., Taylor-Neu, K., & Butterwick, S. (2024). Social processes and institutions: Functions and dysfunctions. Sociological Perspectives. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wilkins, A. (2018). Education governance and social theory: Interdisciplinary approaches. In Education Governance and Social Theory. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wilkins, A., & Olmedo, I. (2018). Conceptualizing education governance: Framings, Continuities and new directions. Journal of Education Policy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study