Smart Contract Adoption in Sarawak’s Construction Industry: A Schematic Review of Drivers, Barriers, and Innovation Attributes

The construction industry in Sarawak is undergoing a gradual digital transformation driven by initiatives such as the Sarawak Digital Economy Strategy and the Integrated Project Monitoring System (iPMS). However, persistent issues—including payment delays, disputes, and inefficient contract management—continue to hinder project performance. Smart contracts, enabled by blockchain technology, offer a promising solution by automating contractual execution, improving transparency, and strengthening accountability. Despite these advantages, adoption in Sarawak remains limited due to regulatory ambiguity, low digital literacy, and inadequate technological infrastructure.
This study investigates the acceptance of smart contracts in Sarawak’s construction industry by identifying key drivers, barriers, and innovation attributes influencing adoption. A schematic review methodology was employed, synthesizing peer-reviewed journals, industry reports, and policy documents. The analysis integrates institutional theory (regulative, normative, and cognitive pillars) with diffusion of innovation attributes, including maintainability, reliability, functionality, and usability.
Findings reveal strong regulative support through state-led digitalization policies but highlight critical challenges such as limited stakeholder awareness, resistance to workflow changes, and uneven ICT infrastructure in rural areas. To operationalize adoption, the study recommends a multi-stakeholder, phased implementation roadmap that integrates digital literacy programs, pilot smart contract projects, and regulatory alignment strategies. Comparative benchmarking with other Malaysian and ASEAN regions is suggested to identify best practices and scalability potential.
Future research should explore cost–benefit analyses, cybersecurity concerns, and integration of smart contracts with BIM and iPMS platforms to enable fully digitalized and secure project delivery systems. By aligning with Sarawak’s digital economy agenda, smart contracts can strengthen efficiency, accountability, and competitiveness in the state’s construction sector.

Smart Contracts, Digitalization, Construction 4.0, Contract Management

1. Agapiou, A. (2023). Overcoming the Legal Barriers to the Implementation of Smart Contracts in the Construction Industry: The Emergence of a Practice and Research Agenda. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akena, D., & Mwesigwa, R. (2023). Institutional pressures and risk governance: Evidence from Uganda’s financial institutions. Journal of Money and Business. Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmb-11-2023-0067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. AL-Ashmori, A., Thangarasu, G., Dominic, P. D. D., & Al-Mekhlafi, A. B. A. (2023). A Readiness Model and Factors Influencing Blockchain Adoption in Malaysia’s Software Sector: A Survey Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Ghamdi, S., et al. (2024). The moderating role of environmental factors between institutional isomorphic pressures and the adoption of IFRS for SMEs: Application of SEM. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2330012. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2330012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Andesta, E., Faghih, F., & Fooladgar, M. (2019). Testing Smart Contracts Gets Smarter. http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04780 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bamgbade, J. A., Hosany, M. M., Ajibike, W. A., & Chai, C. S. (2024). Green supply chain nuances in East Malaysian construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 24(5), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2023.2179470 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bolhassan, D. N., Changsaar, C., Khoso, A. R., Siawchuing, L., Bamgbade, J. A., & Hing, W. N. (2022). Towards Adoption of Smart Contract in Construction Industry in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 30(1), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.30.1.08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cong, L. W., & He, Z. (2019). Blockchain disruption and smart contracts. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1754–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Construction Industry Development Board. (2023). Construction industry review and outlook 2023. CIDB Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, P. K., He, Q. R., & Chu, S. (2022). INFLUENCE OF BLOCKCHAIN AND SMART CONTRACTS ON PARTNERS’ TRUST, VISIBILITY, COMPETITIVENESS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN MANUFACTURING SUPPLY CHAINS. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(4), 754–772. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.16431 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. CIDB Malaysia. (2021). Construction Industry Transformation Programme (CITP) Final Report 2016–2020. Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2024). Sarawak at a glance 2024. DOSM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Diniz Costa Filho, A. C., & Rodrigues Oliveira, R. (2022). Analysis of the institutional pillars of a code of conduct in a non-governmental organization from the institutional and appreciative perspective. Administração Pública e Gestão Social, 14(3). Universidade Federal de Viçosa. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=351571681004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gabuthy, Y. (2023). Blockchain-based dispute resolution: Insights and challenges. Games, 14(3), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/g14030034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hamledari, H., & Fischer, M. (2021). Role of blockchain-enabled smart contracts in automating construction progress payments. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jalong, E. S. (2021). Smart construction concept: perception of G7 contractors in Sarawak. Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sarawak. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/66567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kumar Singh, A., Kumar, V. R. P., Dehdasht, G., Mohandes, S. R., Manu, P., & Pour Rahimian, F. (2023). Investigating the barriers to the adoption of blockchain technology in sustainable construction projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136840 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ministry of Infrastructure and Port Development Sarawak (MIPD). (2022). Annual Report 2022. Government of Sarawak. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mong, S. G., Lua Ejau, R., Ikau, R., & Sendiibil, E. (2024). Unveiling Blockchain Technology in Construction Supply Chain Management: The What, When, Who, Where, and How Towards Digitalization. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS). https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ng, N., Jing, W., Izzati, N., Rahman, A., & Hassan, H. H. (2023). FACTORS INFLUENCING THE ADOPTION OF SMART CONTRACTS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN KLANG VALLEY, MALAYSIA. In Asia Pacific Journal of Emerging Markets (Vol. 7, Issue 2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rathnayake, I., Wedawatta, G., & Tezel, A. (2022). Smart Contracts in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Review. In Buildings (Vol. 12, Issue 12). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12122082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sarawak Government. (2021). Post-COVID-19 Development Strategy (PCDS) 2030. Kuching: Chief Minister’s Department. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sarawak Multimedia Authority. (2022). Sarawak digital economy strategy 2018–2022: Implementation progress report. Government of Sarawak. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. The Borneo Post. (2025, February 19). Sarawak SMEs still struggle digitally. https://www.theborneopost.com/2025/02/19/sarawak-smes-still-struggle-digitally/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2023). Systematic-narrative hybrid literature review: A strategy for integrating a concise methodology into a manuscript. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100381 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. UKAS. (2025, April 17). Kenyalang Smart City Project to accelerate Sarawak’s digital economy & smart cities [News release]. Jabatan Premier Sarawak. https://premierdept.sarawak.gov.my/web/subpage/news_view/16390/UKAS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Vionis, P., & Kotsilieris, T. (2024). The Potential of Blockchain Technology and Smart Contracts in the Energy Sector: A Review. In Applied Sciences (Switzerland) (Vol. 14, Issue 1). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010253 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wang, Q., Lau, R. Y. K., Si, Y. W., Xie, H., & Tao, X. (2023). Blockchain-Enhanced Smart Contract for Cost-Effective Insurance Claims Processing. Journal of Global Information Management, 31(7), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.329927 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wong, J. (2025, February 19). Sarawak SMEs still struggle digitally. The Borneo Post. https://www.theborneopost.com/2025/02/19/sarawak-smes-still-struggle-digitally/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Xu, Y., Chong, H. Y., & Chi, M. (2021). A Review of Smart Contracts Applications in Various Industries: A Procurement Perspective. In Advances in Civil Engineering (Vol. 2021). Hindawi Limited. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5530755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zainuddin, N. F., Rahman, R. A., & Hamzah, N. (2023). Digital readiness and transformation challenges among construction SMEs in East Malaysia. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 28(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.-N., Chen, W., Chen, X., Weng, J., & Imran, M. (2019). An Overview onSmart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.12.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Macroeconomic Variables as Determinants of Agricultural Exports in Nigeria
• Effect of Street Trading Activities on Urban Land Use in Akure, Nigeria
• Mapping the Components of Age-Friendly Communities for Aging in Place
• Socio-Economic Landscape and Housing Aspirations: The Role of Staff Cooperative Societies in Nigerian Tertiary Institutions
• Nature and Characteristics of Housing Condition in Post Covid-19 Era in Dogon-Karfe, Jos South Local Government Area, Plateau State, Nigeria