Socio-Economic Conditions of Female Agricultural Labour in India “A Case Study of Andhra Pradesh”

Women’s role in economic development, in most countries of the world, cannot be undermined. In the third world countries, especially, where agricultures still constitutes the main source of livelihood and the main area of work for most people, women’s contribution is quite high. The strategies undertaken for the development of agriculture in these economies were more concerned with the increase in productivity through mechanization of the agricultural production process and neglected the sex specific composition of the rural labour force. Overtime, men gained from the technical change that came about in agriculture while women were marginalized. They remained mostly as low paid casual labourers. India’s female population, as per 2011 census, is 586.46 million and constitutes 48.46 percent of the total population. Nearly 75 percent of the female population in rural and mostly belong to the subsistence sector. In agriculture women mostly undertake labour intensive and drudgery prone activities like transplanting, weeding, harvesting and post harvest operations. They also work in the allied fields such as animal husbandry, forestry, plantation, fishing etc. More often, the economic activities undertaken by the rural women on their own farm or in animal husbandry get disguised as household work and remain unreported. Agricultural work is seasonal in nature. During the off season women in agriculture have to struggle hard to find alternate source of income.

Women labourers, Scheduled Caste (Dalit), productivity

1. Mohan Kumar S (2008), “Kerala’s Agricultural Labourers - Victims of a Crisis”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.4(2), pp.48-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Narula S (2008), “Equal by Law, Unequal by Caste: The Untouchable Condition in Critical Race Perspective”, Wisconsin International Law Journal, Vol.26, pp.255-257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Jose C T and Jayasekhar (2008), “Growth trends in area, Production and Productivity of Arecanut in India”, Agricultural Situation in India, Vol.65(3), pp.135-140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kannappan P (2008), “Scheduled Castes Welfare”, APH Publishing Corporation, New Delhi, Vo.5(8), p.44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Nisha N (2008), “Women Labour in Agriculture in India : Some Facets,” International Journal of Business and Economic Research, Volume 1(1) pp.1-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Wankhede G G (2008), “Accessing Higher Education : Affirmative Action and Structured Inequality – The Indian Experience”, Social Change, Vol.38(1), pp.31-51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Farid et.al (2009), “Nature and extent of Rural Women’s Participation in Agricultural and Non-agricultural Activities”, Agricultural Science Digest, Vol.29(4), pp.254-259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Sukhadeo Thorat and Nidhi Sadana (2009), “Caste and Ownership of Private Enterprises”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.44 (23), pp.13-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Shailaja Paik (2009), “Amchya Jalmachi Chittarkatha (The Bioscope of Our Lives): Who is my Ally?”, “Economic & Political Weekly”, Vol. XLIV (40), pp.39-47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rajnish Kumar, Satendra Kumar, and Arup Mitra (2009), “Social and Economic Inequalities : Contemporary Significance of Caste in India”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.44(50), pp.55-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Darshan Singh (2009), “Development of Scheduled Castes in India – A Review”, Journal of Rural Development, Vol.28(4), pp.529-542. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bala N (2010), “Selective discrimination against women in Indian Agriculture - A Review” Agricultural Reviews, Vol.31 (3), pp.224–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sukpal Sing (2009), “Survival of Agricultural labour in Punjab: A burning question”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.XLIV(29), pp.24-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jodhka Surinder (2010), “Caste and Democracy: Assertion and Identity among the Dalits of Rural Punjab”, Sociological Bulletin, Vol.55(1), pp.4-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Vijayabaskar (2010), “Saving Agricultural Labour from Agriculture: SEZs and Politics of Silence in Tamil Nadu”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.78(4), pp.65-73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tahir Munir et al. (2010), “Women Labour in Agriculture in India : Some Facets,” International Journal of Business and Economic Research, Vol.1(1) pp.145-147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Smitha M Patil (2010), “Social Exclusion and Exploitation of Dalit Women”, Women’s Link, Vol.20(2), pp.43-45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nirantar Centre for Gender and Education (2011), New Worlds, New Skills Leadership Development with Muslim and Dalit Women, www.nirantar.mail@gmail.com. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Madhura Swaminathan (2010), “Women and Agriculture, Works and Wages”, Gender and Discrimination, Vol.2 (3), pp.59-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Breeding for a Greener Future: Selective Breeding and Crossbreeding Approaches to Minimize Methane Emissions in Ruminant Livestock
• Determinants of Adoption of Post-Harvest Losses Prevention Techniques among Banana/Plantain Marketers in Lagos State, Nigeria
• Enhancing Rice Yield Prediction Using UAV-Based Multispectral Imaging and Machine Learning Algorithms
• Seed-Borne Fungi of Groundnuts (Arachis Hypogaea) and Their Management with Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) Extract In Makurdi, Nigeria
• The Influence of Landforms and Slope on Agricultural Cropping Patterns in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar District