Strategies for Transforming Doctoral Non-Completion into Academic Leadership Empowerment: Insights from Higher Education Management Practices

Doctoral non-completion among academic staff presents a persistent challenge for higher education institutions seeking to maintain competitiveness and leadership capacity. This study explores strategies for transforming doctoral non-completion into academic leadership empowerment within a Malaysian university context. Using a qualitative case study design at Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), data were collected through semi-structured interviews with three senior academic leaders. Thematic analysis revealed three interrelated strategies which are structured personal development, empathetic and collaborative culture, and faculty development and career advancement. These strategies collectively reposition non-completion as a developmental pathway rather than a terminal setback. Findings align with Malaysia’s Education Blueprint (Higher Education) 2015–2025 and AKEPT’s leadership agenda. The noble purpose of this study is to provide actionable insights that enable universities to retain talent, safeguard institutional reputation, and accelerate leadership capacity while doctoral completion remains in progress.

Academic leadership; doctoral non- completion

1. AKEPT. (2022). Mission, vision & core values. Higher Education Leadership Academy. https://akept.mohe.gov.my/en/corporate/mission-vision-and-roles [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Azman, N., Halim, S., & Komoo, I. (2012). Academic managers or leaders? Developing a new paradigm of academic leadership for university organization. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 11(3), 71–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Boyatzis, R. E., Rochford, K., & Taylor, S. N. (2015). The role of the positive emotional attractor in vision and shared vision: Toward effective leadership, relationships, and engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 670. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00670 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brown, L., & Chartier, A. (2025). Peer mentoring in postgraduate education: Enhancing leadership and retention. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 1(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chadha, D., Kogelbauer, A., Campbell, J., & Hale, C. (2021). Are the kids alright? Exploring students’ experiences of support mechanisms to enhance wellbeing on an engineering programme in the UK. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(6), 1080–1098. https:// 10.1080/03043797.2020.1835828 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Delnoij, E., Dirkx, K., Janssen, J., & Martens, R. (2020). Predicting and resolving non-completion in higher (online) education: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 29, 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100313 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. 1–32). Sage Publications Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Frantz, J., Cupido-Masters, J., Moosajee, F., & Smith, M. R. (2022). Non-cognitive support for postgraduate studies: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 834567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.773910 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L. (2006) How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18, 59-82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hutchings, M. (2017). Improving doctoral support through group supervision: Analysing face-to-face and technology-mediated strategies for nurturing and sustaining scholarship. Studies in Higher Education, 42(3), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1058352 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Laurie E.C. Delnoij, Kim J.H. Dirkx, José P.W. Janssen, Rob L. Martens. (2020). Predicting and resolving non-completion in higher (online) education – A literature review, Educational Research Review, 29, 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100313 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lee, A. (2018). How can supervisors develop the modern doctorate? Studies in Higher Education, 43(5), 857–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Marshall, S., Adams, M., & Cameron, A. (2000). In search of academic leadership. http://www.ascilite.org.au/aset-archives/confs/ aset-erdsa2000/procs/marshall.html). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Malaysia Education Blueprint (Higher Education) 2015–2025. https://www.um.edu.my/docs/um-magazine/4-executive-summary-pppm-2015-2025.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Newlands F, Markan T, Pomfret I, Davey E, King T, Roach A, et al. (2025) “A PhD is just going to somehow break you”: A qualitative study exploring the role of peer support for doctoral students. PLoS One 20(6): e0325726. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325726 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to lead in higher education. London, New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rowley, D. J., & Sherman, H. (2003). The special challenges of academic leadership. Management Decision, 41(10), 1058–1063. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310509580 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Spendlove, M. (2007). Competencies for Effective Leadership in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(5), 407-417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Waight, E., & Giordano, A. (2018). Doctoral students’ access to non-academic support for mental health. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 40(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2018.1478613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Zhou, E., & Okahana, H. (2019). The role of department supports on doctoral completion and time-to-degree. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 21(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116682 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study