Strengthening Tertiary Literacy Recovery: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Partido State University Reading Center Intervention

The COVID-19 pandemic magnified existing literacy gaps among Filipino learners, prompting higher education institutions to adopt targeted interventions to mitigate learning loss. This study examined the implementation, outcomes, and effectiveness of the newly established Partido State University Reading Center, funded through the Commission on Higher Education’s Institutional Development and Innovations Grant. Using a mixed-methods design, the study assessed the socio-demographic characteristics, reading attitudes, literacy needs of 696 freshmen STEM students and reading performance of 51 freshmen STEM students across the main and external campuses during Academic Year 2023–2024. Results revealed that the majority of qualifiers were aged 18–19 and came from mid-sized to large families, conditions that may shape access to learning resources. Students demonstrated substantial literacy needs, particularly in grammar (95%), vocabulary (90%), and higher-order comprehension skills such as summarizing (98%), synthesizing (95%), and inferring (90%). Environmental and social factors especially noisy study spaces (75.4%), peer influence (17.7%), and family influence (17.4%) emerged as significant demotivators to reading engagement. ICT access was characterized by a near-universal reliance on mobile phones (98%), highlighting digital inequities in laptop and desktop availability. Progress monitoring across four colleges showed varied literacy gains, with several cohorts (e.g., Lime and Aqua groups) demonstrating marked improvement, consistent with literature emphasizing the benefits of structured, multi-semester reading interventions. However, program completion rates remained critically low, with only 12.81% (51 of 398) completing the reading program, indicating barriers in motivation, scheduling, and continuity of intervention. The paired samples t-test revealed a significant improvement in reading performance among the 51 completers, t(50) = 41.31, p < .001, with posttest scores markedly higher than pretest scores, confirming the positive impact of the intervention on reading proficiency. Despite logistical challenges, the Reading Center effectively improved reading performance among consistent participants. The findings underscore the need for institutionalized, curriculum-integrated reading support; enhanced monitoring; differentiated instruction; and strengthened implementation across external campuses. Recommendations highlight the importance of creating conducive reading environments, leveraging community support systems, and integrating literacy development into academic programs to ensure sustainable reading proficiency gains.

reading center, reading program

1. Bernardo, A. B. I., Lim, K. M., & Yee, M. T. (2021). Reading comprehension and foundational literacy gaps among Filipino college freshmen: Post-pandemic implications for higher education. Philippine Journal of Education Studies, 96(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Castillo, K., Tan, R., & Basilio, C. (2020). Regional disparities in functional literacy and poverty in the Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 12(1), 23–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cervetti, G. N., Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A. S., & Afflerbach, P. (2020). How the reading process should inform the teaching of reading. The Reading Teacher, 73(6), 749–763. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Commission on Higher Education. (2022). Institutional Development and Innovation Grant (IDIG) guidelines. CHED Memorandum Circular No. 1, Series of 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44(3), 166–203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. FLEMMS. (2008). Functional Literacy, Education and Mass Media Survey. Philippine Statistics Authority. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gan, D. & Ocampo, T. (2022). Community-based literacy interventions and reading attitudes among Filipino children: Lessons from the Balsa Basa Program. Bicol Education Review, 14(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Guzman, M., & Limpin, R. (2023). Effects of structured reading interventions on vocabulary and inferential comprehension among tertiary learners. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(4), 612–631. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2019). Scaffolding language and learning: Teaching English-language learners in the mainstream classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 53(2), 345–370. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2003). Functional literacy, education and mass media survey. PSA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2024). Functional Literacy, Education and Mass Media Survey (FLEMMS). https://psa.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2025). Functional literacy statistics in the Philippines: Highlights from national surveys. PSA Press Release. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Philstar. (2025). Poverty, literacy challenges persist in BARMM, PSA reports. Philstar Global. https://www.philstar.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Programme for International Student Assessment. (2022). PISA 2022 results: Reading literacy. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. RA 7743. (1994). An Act providing for the establishment of congressional, city and municipal libraries and barangay reading centers throughout the Philippines. https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/2399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Shanahan, T. (2020). What counts as evidence for reading interventions? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(5), 503–506. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Snow, C. E. (2021). The challenge of reading comprehension in a digital age. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 515–524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Snow, C. E., & Sweet, A. P. (2003). Reading for comprehension. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 29(2), 9–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. (2019). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. UNESCO. (2022). Global learning losses and recovery: Report on post-pandemic educational progress. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. UNESCO. (2023). Literacy as a human right: Global monitoring report. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. World Bank. (2022). The state of learning poverty in the Philippines: Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on education. World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study