Takyīf Fiqhī of Takāful Contract from Shariah Perspective: A Comparison between AAOIFI, IIFA and the Malaysian Shariah Resolutions and Practices

The juridical adaptation (takyīf fiqhī) of the takāful contract remains a subject of intense scholarly debate within Islamic finance, reflecting divergent methodological approaches to reconciling modern financial products with classical jurisprudence. This paper provides a comparative analysis of the takyīf fiqhī of takāful from the perspectives of three major standard-setting bodies: the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI), the International Islamic Fiqh Academy (IIFA, or Majma’ al-Fiqh al-Islāmī), and the resolutions and practices prevalent in Malaysia. The study begins by tracing the linguistic roots and conceptual evolution of takāful, distinguishing it from its conventional insurance counterpart and pre-modern risk-sharing practices like ‘āqilah and tanāḥud. The core of the analysis critically examines the distinct contractual frameworks employed by each authority. AAOIFI’s Standard No. 26 conceptualizes takāful through a tripartite structure, anchoring the participant's relationship in a binding donation commitment (iltizām bi-tabarru’). In contrast, the Malaysian model operationalizes this through a hybrid tabarru’-hibah system, which, while commercially effective, introduces juristic ambiguities concerning ownership and reciprocal benefit. The IIFA, however, champions a paradigm rooted in the Qur’anic principle of mutual cooperation (taʿāwun), framing takāful as a novel cooperative covenant (‘aqd taʿāwunī) governed by mutual forbearance (musāmāḥah). This paper employs tarjīḥ (juristic preference) to evaluate these competing models, arguing that the IIFA's taʿāwun-based framework, validated by the Prophetic precedent of tanāḥud, offers a theologically and jurisprudentially more coherent foundation. It effectively resolves the ontological tensions inherent in the tabarru’ and hibah models regarding ownership of the fund, the permissibility of unequal benefits, and the inherent gharar in risk-sharing, thereby affirming takāful’s authentic nature as a manifestation of divinely ordained mutual responsibility.

Takyif Fiqhi, Takāful contract, Islamic insurance, AAOIFI

1. Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). (2017). AAOIFI Sharīʿah Standards. Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Buhuti. (n.d.). Kashshaf al-Qina’ “an Matn al-Iqna” (Vol. 4). Dar al-Kotob al-’Ilmiyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Hattab. (2003). Mawahibul Jalil Sharh Mukhtasar Khalil (Vol. 8). Dar al-Kotob al-’Ilmiyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. al-Qaradaghi, A. M. (n.d.). Hukm at-Ta’min at-Tijari. Retrieved October 3, 2025, from https://alqaradaghi.com/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D8%B5%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%88%D9%84-%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%AC%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%8A/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Holdsworth, W. S. (1917). The Early History of the Contract of Insurance. Columbia Law Review, 17(2), 85–113. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1111672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ibn al-Humam. (2003). Fathul Qadir (Vol. 9). Dar al-Kotob al-’ilmiyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ibn Hajar al-Haytami. (1983). Tuhfatul Muhtaj fi Sharh al-Minhaj (Vol. 6). Al-Maktabah at-Tijariyah al-Kubra. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ibn Muflih. (1999). Al-Adab ash-Shar’iyyah wal Manhu al-Mar’iyyah (Al-Arnauth. Shuaib & U. Al-Qayyam, Eds.; Vol. 3). Mu’assasah Ar-Risalah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ikaz, M. A. (2011). At-Ta’sil Ash-Shar’i li Fikrah al-Haq at-Tabaduli fi al-Fiqh al-Islamiy. Majallah Dar Al-Ifta’ al-Misriyyah, 3(7), 12–57. https://dftaa.journals.ekb.eg/issue_18333_18475.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. International Islamic Fiqh Academy. (2024). Resolutions and Recommendations of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy (Third Edition). International Islamic Fiqh Academy. https://iifa-aifi.org/en/resolutions [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Islamic Financial Services Act, Pub. L. No. 759, Government of Malaysia (2013). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Majallah Al-Ahkam Al-’Adliyyah, Pub. L. No. 165, 1 (1884). https://ebook.univeyes.com/121688/pdf-مجلة-الأحكام-العدلية# [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Muwaffaq, B. M. (2021). Qararat Hayʾat Kibār al-ʿUlamāʾ. https://iefpedia.com/arab/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%87%D9%8A%D8%A6%D8%A9-%D9%83%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%A1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Rabitah al-’Alam al-Islami. (1978). Qararat al-Majma’ al-Fiqhi al-Islami. https://baitalzakat.com/files/decisions-laws/baitalzakat.com-L100025.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ibn ‘Ābidīn. (2003). Raddul Muhtar (A. Abdul Mawjud & M. Mu’awwadh, Eds.; Special Edition, Vol. 6). Dar ’Alam al-Kotob. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Takāful Operational Framework, Bank Negara Malaysia (2019). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Wizaratul Awqaf wa as-Shu’un al-Islamiyyah. (2006). Mawsu’ah al-Fiqhiyyah al-Kuwaitiyyah (First Edition). Wizaratul Awqaf wa as-Shu’un al-Islamiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Study on Customer Awareness on Green Banking Intiatives
• International Financial Reporting Standards and Earnings Management: A Global Research Landscape Analysis
• Analysis of Financial Performance and Operational Efficiency of State Bank of India Using the CAMEL Framework
• Roles and Performance of India Post Payment Bank (IPPB) With Special References to Shivamogga District
• Enhancing Transactional Security in U.S. Banking Systems by Implementing OTP-Based Two-Factor Authentication to Mitigate Debit and Credit Card Fraud