Teachers’ Competence in Integrating Technology in Teaching Geography Subject

Authors

Jesco A. Mpolya

Ruaha Catholic University (Tanzania)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000597

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 7329-7339

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-26

Accepted: 2025-11-04

Published: 2025-11-19

Abstract

The integration of technology in teaching has the potential to enhance student understanding, engagement, and academic performance, particularly in subjects like Geography that involve complex concepts and spatial analysis. This study investigated Teachers’ Competence in Integrating Technology in Teaching Geography at secondary schools in Tanzania. A mixed-methods approach was employed, using a concurrent research design. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and classroom observations involving Geography teachers across four schools. The findings revealed three distinct levels of competence: high, moderate, and low. Teachers with high competence effectively used multiple digital tools, including PowerPoint, videos, Google Earth, and GIS applications, to deliver interactive and inquiry-based lessons that promoted student engagement and comprehension. Those with moderate competence utilized basic tools such as slides and projectors, improving lesson clarity but avoiding advanced applications, while teachers with low competence relied primarily on traditional methods due to limited skills, training, and infrastructural support. The study emphasizes that teacher competence is a critical determinant of effective technology integration and has direct implications for student achievement. Recommendations include targeted professional development programs, ongoing technical support, and investment in infrastructure to enhance teachers’ digital pedagogical skills and improve learning outcomes in Geography subject.

Keywords

Teachers’ Competence, Integrating Technology, Geography Subject

Downloads

References

1. Asad, A., Hussain, S., Wadho, M. A., Khand, Z. H., & Churi, P. P. (2021). Impact of technology integration on students’ academic performance: Evidence from Geography education. Journal of Education and Practice, 12(10), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/12-10-05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Daily News. (2022, November 6). Census tablets distributed to schools, colleges. Daily News Tanzania. https://dailynews.co.tz [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dede, C. (2007). Transforming education for the 21st century: New pedagogies that leverage ubiquitous learning. Journal of Learning Sciences, 16(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400709336945 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Demissie, T., Labiso, A., & Thuo, J. (2022). Teachers’ digital competence and integration of technology in classroom instruction in Ethiopia. African Journal of Teacher Education, 11(2), 145–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Doering, A., Koseoglu, S., Scharber, C., Henrickson, J., & Lanegran, D. (2014). Technology integration in geography education: A review of research and implications for practice. Journal of Geography, 113(3), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2013.846392 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Elias, S. (2023). Teachers’ preparedness for ICT integration in secondary school instruction in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 19(1), 55–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. George, S. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Goga, C., & Roșu, D. (2021). Technology-enhanced Geography teaching and learning: A mixed-methods study in Romanian schools. European Journal of Geography, 12(2), 102–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064–1069. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kadhim, A. (2020). The role of technology in enhancing Geography learning outcomes: A case of Iraqi secondary schools. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 3(4), 22–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Madobi, M. (2021). Teachers’ technological competence and its influence on students’ Geography performance in Zimbabwean secondary schools. African Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 78–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Maxwell, J. (2022). Digital pedagogy and the enhancement of Geography education through visualization tools. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 7(3), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mollel, P., Minami, K., Munezero, M., & Ngayinteranya, E. (2022). Teachers’ technological competence and student learning outcomes in Rwandan secondary schools. African Journal of Education and Technology, 12(4), 201–217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Narzullaevna, K. M. (2020). The use of information technology in teaching Geography. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 8(11), 128–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ndume, P., Kisanga, D., & Selemani, F. (2024). Assessing ICT integration and teacher preparedness in Tanzanian secondary schools. Journal of Educational Practice and Policy, 15(2), 88–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Pantić, N. (2011). Teacher competence as a basis for teacher education: Views of Serbian teachers and teacher educators. CEPS Journal, 1(4), 77–96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Prosper, L., & Nderego, A. (2024). Challenges facing teachers in tablet utilization for teaching and learning in Tanzanian secondary schools. Tanzania Journal of Education and Science, 13(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sahin, S. (2012). The role of connectivism in learning and teaching through digital technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(4), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9245-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Telore, A., & Dametew, M. (2021). Teachers’ technological competence and barriers to ICT use in Geography classrooms in Ethiopia. International Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 89–101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles