Technology Integration in STEM Learning: An Analysis of Digital Usage among Rural Primary School Students, Sarawak

This preliminary study aims to examine how digital learning can support digital literacy among primary school students in Science and Mathematics in Sarawak. With the increasing integration of technology in education, digital learning has the potential to become an important medium that not only improves digital literacy, but also strengthens understanding of STEM concepts in an English language environment. This descriptive quantitative study involved 40 students from years four to six in a government primary school in Sarawak. The study instrument was a structured questionnaire to obtain data and initial observations on the level of access to digital devices, digital literacy skills, and patterns of technology use by students in the context of learning Science and Mathematics through English. The study findings show that primary school students have a relatively good level of digital access, especially through the use of smartphones, which are their main devices at home. In learning Science and Mathematics, the use of technology was found to be minimal and did not involve in-depth interactive applications. Students relied more on watching videos or searching for instant information, while the use of specialized software such as simulations, digital quizzes or STEM training applications has not yet been widely practiced. This finding illustrates that although students have exposure to technology, the potential of digital devices as learning tools has not yet been optimally utilized. This study suggests that teachers design more structured and authentic digital activities, including the use of virtual simulations, educational games, video assignments, and interactive learning platforms to simultaneously improve language proficiency and understanding of STEM concepts.

STEM, digital learning, technology usage, rural school, primary school

1. Ahmad, S. (2019, January). Analysis of Problems in Science Practical Work at Secondary School Level. In 5th International Multi-disciplinary Research Conference: Global Prosperity through Research and Sustainable Development. At: Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University Peshawar, Pakistan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Awidi, H. M., & Al-Furaih, S. A. A. (2023). Teachers' informal learning characteristics in using open educational resources in relation to their innovative work behavior. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 40(2), 113-129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alakrash, H. M., & Abdul Razak, N. (2021). Technology-based language learning: Investigation of digital technology and digital literacy. Sustainability, 13(21), 12304. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anastasiadis, T., Lampropoulos, G., & Siakas, K. (2018). Digital game-based learning and serious games in education. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering, 4(12), 139-144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Anuar, N., & Hussin, W. N. M. (2021). Digital literacy skills among Malaysian primary school learners: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(3), 350 357. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ariza, J. Á. (2023). Bringing active learning, experimentation, and student-created videos in engineering: A study about teaching electronics and physical computing integrating online and mobile learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(6), 1723-1749. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices, 30(2008), 17-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bayuong, P. D., Yunus, M. M., & Suliman, A. (2019). The use of social media (SM) among pupils in a rural primary school in Sarawak, Malaysia. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5), 1272-1279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bernacki, M. L., Vosicka, L., Utz, J. C., & Warren, C. B. (2021). Effects of digital learning skill training on the academic performance of undergraduates in science and mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Byukusenge, C., Nsanganwimana, F., & Tarmo, A. P. (2023). Enhancing students’ understanding of nerve cells’ structures and their symbiotic functioning by using technology-enhanced instruction incorporating virtual labs and animations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 13-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ching, C. C., Basham, J. D., & Jang, E. (2005). The legacy of the digital divide: Gender, socioeconomic status, and early exposure as predictors of full-spectrum technology use among young adults. Urban Education, 40(4), 394-411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Crawford, R., & Jenkins, L. (2017). Blended learning and team teaching: Adapting pedagogy in response to the changing digital tertiary environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Davis, E. K., Bishop, A. J., & Seah, W. T. (2015). “We Don’t Understand English That Is Why We Prefer English”: Primary School Students’preference For The Language Of Instruction In Mathematics. International journal of science and mathematics education, 13(3), 583-604. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hafni, R. N., Herman, T., Nurlaelah, E., & Mustikasari, L. (2020, March). The importance of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education to enhance students’ critical thinking skill in facing the industry 4.0. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1521, No. 4, p. 042040). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ichhpujani, P., Singh, R. B., Foulsham, W., Thakur, S., & Lamba, A. S. (2019). Visual implications of digital device usage in school children: a cross-sectional study. BMC ophthalmology, 19(1), 76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jaffee, D. (2003). Virtual transformation: Web-based technology and pedagogical change. Teaching Sociology, 31(2), 227-236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kerimbayev, N., Umirzakova, Z., Shadiev, R., & Jotsov, V. (2023). A student centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: a systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kier, M. W., Blanchard, M. R., Osborne, J. W., & Albert, J. L. (2014). The development of the STEM career interest survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education, 44(3), 461–481. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9389-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kurniawan, A. B. (2022, January). Potential benefits of combination of English language teaching and STEM. In 2nd International Conference on Education and Technology (ICETECH 2021) (pp. 131-137). Atlantis Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Liu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025). Advancing STEM Education for Sustainability: The Impact of Graphical Knowledge Visualization and User Experience on Continuance Intention in Mixed-Reality Environments. Sustainability, 17(9), 3869. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mohamed Anuar, M. (2021). STEM education and young people's aspirations for development in" luar bandar": a Malaysian case study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Niu, L., Wang, X., Wallace, M. P., Pang, H., & Xu, Y. (2022). Digital learning of English as a foreign language among university students: How are approaches to learning linked to digital competence and technostress?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1332-1346. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Radesky, J. S., Weeks, H. M., Ball, R., Schaller, A., Yeo, S., Durnez, J., ... & Barr, R. (2020). Young children’s use of smartphones and tablets. Pediatrics, 146(1). Sivan, V. (2020). Effects of Crazytalk Software on Year Three Linus Learners’ Vocabulary Development (Master's thesis, University of Malaya (Malaysia)). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Roy, A. (2024). Impact of Digital Storytelling on Motivation in Middle School English Classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.353434. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tan, S. (2022). Teaching in the Next Generation Learning Spaces: A Qualitative Study on Polytechnic Lecturers’“Lived” Experiences [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study