The Administrative-Substantive Paradox in Collaborative Governance: A Case Study of University-Regional Government Collaboration in Indonesia

This study evaluates the collaboration between the Research and Community Service Institute (LPPM) of Universitas Jenderal Soedirman and the Secretariat of the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) of Cilacap Regency in developing Academic Manuscripts for Regional Regulation Drafts (Raperda) in 2024. Employing a descriptive-evaluative qualitative approach within a Collaborative Governance framework, this research analyzes the subst antive quality of outputs, the alignment of research team competencies, and the dynamics of collaborative processes through in-depth interviews with key stakeholders. Findings reveal a paradox between high administrative efficiency and low substantive quality, whereby none of the three Academic Manuscripts produced advanced to the promulgation stage. Critical issues include the utilization of outdated regulations, competency gaps in teams not based on needs analysis, and collaborative processes that remain transactional rather than deliberative. Power asymmetries were reflected in partners' limited authority to determine team composition, while the absence of multi-layered quality assurance mechanisms and periodic evaluations resulted in problems remaining undetected until the final stages. The study recommends an ideal cooperation model founded on five pillars: paradigm transformation toward collaborative partnership, competency-based team formation with active partner participation, implementation of multi-layered quality assurance, strengthening of deliberative communication, and development of continuous learning systems. This transformation requires institutional commitment to positioning partnership, quality, participation, and continuous learning as core values in academic-local government collaborations, with success evaluation based not solely on administrative efficiency but also on output quality and tangible contributions to regional regulation improvement.

Collaborative Governance, University-Government Cooperation, Academic Manuscript for Regional Regulation Draft, Quality Assurance, Research Team Competency

1. Abidin, Z. (2021). Lokakarya Penguatan Kolaborasi Antar Lembaga Pelayanan Pendampingan Untuk UMKM di Indonesia. PROGRESIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Komunitas Pendidikan, 1(2), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.36406/progresif.v1i2.434 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abubakar, R. (2021). Pengantar metodologi penelitian (Pertama). SUKA - Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anas, M., Forijati, R., & Muchson, M. (2023). Analyzing Information System Quality and Financial Information Quality: An Evidence of Local Government Organizations in Indonesia. Qubahan Academic Journal, 3(4), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.58429/qaj.v3n4a179 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Budiman, M. A. (2021). Konsep Demokratis dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Khatulistiwa Law Review, 2(1), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.24260/klr.v2i1.298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bungin, B. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Rajawali Pers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cairney, P., & Oliver, K. (2017). Evidence-based Policymaking is not like Evidence-based Medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between Evidence and Policy? Health Research Policy and Systems, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0192-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Castañer, X., & Oliveira, N. (2020). Collaboration, Coordination, and Cooperation Among Organizations: Establishing the Distinctive Meanings of These Terms Through a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Management, 46(6), 965–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320901565 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Corley, E. A., Boardman, P. C., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies. Research Policy, 35(7), 975–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fu, Y. C., Macasaet, B. T., Quetzal, A. S., Junedi, J., & Moradel-Vásquez, J. J. (2024). In Pursuit of Excellence: a Historical Investigation of Scientific Production in Indonesia’s Higher Education System, 1990–2020. Higher Education, 88(2), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01128-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gazley, B. (2017). The Current State of Interorganizational Collaboration: Lessons for Human Service Research and Management. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2015.1095582 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hedges, J. R., Soliman, K. F. A., Southerland, W. M., D’Amour, G., Fernández-Repollet, E., Khan, S. A., Kumar, D., Shikuma, C. M., Rivers, B. M., Yates, C. C., Yanagihara, R., Thompson, W. E., Bond, V. C., Harris-Hooker, S., McClure, S. A., & Ofili, E. O. (2021). Strengthening and Sustaining Inter-Institutional Research Collaborations and Partnerships. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2727. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052727 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ibrahim, A., Alang, A. H., Madi, Baharuddin, Ahmad, Mu. A., & Darmawati. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian (I. Ismail, Ed.; Pertama). Gunadarma Ilmu. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Khomsi, K., Bouzghiba, H., Mendyl, A., Al-Delaimy, A. K., Dahri, A., Saad-Hussein, A., Balaw, G., El Marouani, I., Sekmoudi, I., Adarbaz, M., Khanjani, N., & Abbas, N. (2024). Bridging Research-Policy Gaps: An Integrated Approach. Environmental Epidemiology, 8(1), e281. https://doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000281 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lahat, L., Sher-Hadar, N., & Galnoor, I. (2021). Introduction: Collaborative Governance. In Collaborative Governance (pp. 1–24). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45807-2_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Moleong, L. J. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi) (Revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Natário, M. M., Pedro Almeida Couto, J., & Fernandes Roque de Almeida, C. (2012). The triple helix model and dynamics of innovation: a case study. Journal of Knowledge-Based Innovation in China, 4(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561411211208758 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Natsir, N., Amirullah, I., Syafaruddin, S., Khaeriyah, K., Mursalin, M., & Mallawi, M. N. (2024). Kolaborasi Pemerintah Desa Kalukubodo Kec. Galesong Selatan Kab. Takalar dan Perguruan Tinggi Stia Yappi Kita Wujudkan Kemandirian Lokal dan Ketahanan Pangan. MENGABDI: Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Bersama Masyarakat, 2(4), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.61132/mengabdi.v2i4.811 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nawawi, Muh., Mahfuzat, M., Haryono, D., Nasrullah, N., Mufti, M. I., Fadilah, N., Yusnitha, Y., Andika, M., & Alfian, M. (2025). Collaborative Governance Strategy in the Implementation of Planning and Development Deliberations in Tojo Una-Una Regency, Indonesia. LEX LOCALIS-JOURNAL OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT, 23(10), 355–370. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Noor, I. H. (2010). Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat pada Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 16(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v16i3.462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nsanzumuhire, S. U., & Groot, W. (2020). Context Perspective on University-Industry Collaboration Processes: A Systematic Review of Literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120861 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pahleviannur, Mu. R. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Pradina Pustaka (Vol. 1, Issue 69). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic Engagement: A Review of the Literature 2011-2019. Research Policy, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Purdy, J. M. (2012). A Framework for Assessing Power in Collaborative Governance Processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rideng, I. W., Wijaya, K. K. A., & Widiati, I. A. (2024). Pendampingan Penyusunan Naskah Akademik dan Rancangan Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Badung Tentang Perlindungan dan Pemberdayaan Usaha Mikro di Kabupaten Badung. Lumbung Inovasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 9(4), 976–984. https://doi.org/10.36312/linov.v9i4.2237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Saleh, C., Hendrik, E., Zauhar, S., & Nuh, M. (2021). Collaborative Governance in Public Administration Perspective. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 56(6), 655–665. https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.6.58 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Situmorang, M., Gultom, S., Hamid K, A., Panjaitan, A. M., & Ritonga, W. (2018). University-Government Collaboration Model to Improve School Teacher Competence in North Sumatra, Indonesia. International Journal of Training Research, 16(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2018.1576324 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sullivan, E., Fraussen, B., & Braun, C. (2025). Lead, Link, or Leverage? An Integrative Framework to Assess Different Government Roles in Collaborative Governance Processes Across Political Systems. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Yatun, I., Mulyani, S., Winarningsih, S., & Sukmadilaga, C. (2021). Indonesian Local Governments’ Commitment to the Quality of the Education Sector. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 26(2), 347–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Yaxin, Z., & Adnan, A. B. M. (2025). Organizational Structure and Stakeholder Engagement in Organizational Performance: A Systematic Literature Review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025312 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Decadal Overview of Welfare Schemes in Telangana (2014–2024)
• Ubuntu and the Missed Development Goals in the Global South: Rethinking MDGs and SDGs through an African Philosophical Lens
• Exploring the Factors of Obesity: Insights from Johor State Civil Servants
• Navigating the Nexus: Challenges Faced by Part-Time Postgraduate Government Employees in Malaysia
• The Lived Experiences of Skilled Filipino Women Immigrants in Denmark