The Death Penalty and Foreign Drug Offenders in Indonesia: A Judicial Perspective on Justice

The phenomenon of narcotics abuse in Indonesia continues to escalate, including the involvement of foreign nationals (FNs) in international trafficking networks. The Indonesian government has responded to this threat through Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, which explicitly provides for the possibility of imposing the death penalty. This article examines the judicial considerations underlying the imposition of capital punishment on foreign nationals convicted of narcotics offenses, as well as its implications for the principles of justice and human rights. Employing a normative juridical approach and case analysis, this study finds that the death penalty is regarded as an ultimum remedium instrument applied to extraordinary crimes. However, disparities in judgments across similar cases indicate the presence of judicial discretion that may generate issues of legal certainty and substantive justice.

Death penalty, narcotics, judge's consideration, justice

1. Amnesty International. (2021). Amnesty International Report 2021/22: The State of the World’s Human Rights. London: Amnesty International Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arief, B. N. (2018). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hood, R., & Hoyle, C. (2017). The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2007). Putusan No. 2-3/PUU-V/2007 tentang Uji Materiil Hukuman Mati dalam Undang-Undang Narkotika. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Nasir, M., & Rosadi, A. (2019). Combating Drug Crime in Indonesia: Between Criminal Law and Human Rights Approach. Journal of Law and Legal Studies, 6(2), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan. (2012). Putusan No. 1372/Pid.B/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel tentang Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Jakarta: PN Jakarta Selatan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Pengadilan Tinggi DKI Jakarta. (2013). Putusan No. 118/PID/2013/PT.DKI tentang Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Jakarta: PT DKI Jakarta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2020). World Drug Report 2020. Vienna: UNODC [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.