The Effectiveness of Integrated STEM Approaches on Secondary School Students’ Critical Thinking: A Systematic Literature Review (2019–2025)

Authors

Nurul Huda Kasim

Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Sultan Idris Education Universiti (Malaysia)

Mohamad Termizi Borhan

Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Sultan Idris Education Universiti (Malaysia)

Nur Izwani Mohd Shapri

Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Sultan Idris Education Universiti (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.927000011

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/27 | Page No: 84-91

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-12

Accepted: 2025-11-18

Published: 2025-11-26

Abstract

This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) synthesizes empirical evidence published between 2019 and 2025 on the effectiveness of integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) approaches in enhancing secondary school students’ Critical Thinking (CT) skills. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a total of 201 records were identified (48 from Scopus and 153 from Google Scholar), from which 17 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings demonstrate that integrated STEM (iSTEM) interventions generally have a positive impact on students’ CT, particularly in developing analytical reasoning, problem-solving, and collaborative inquiry. Effective approaches included Project-Based Learning (PjBL), Problem-Based Learning (PBL), and Design-Based or Robotics-Integrated Inquiry. However, persistent challenges remain concerning teacher preparedness, curriculum alignment, and the valid assessment of CT. Overall, iSTEM education demonstrates strong potential to cultivate CT among secondary school learners. Nevertheless, future research should include more longitudinal designs, standardized assessment tools, and targeted professional development to strengthen implementation and sustainability.

Keywords

Integrated STEM, Critical Thinking

Downloads

References

1. Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ananda, Y. Y. T., Nazriati, N., & Dasna, I. W. (2021). Inquiry learning with a STEM approach to increase critical thinking skills in terms of students’ initial abilities. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043620 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ashari, R. M. R., Suwono, H., & Fachrunnisa, R. (2021). Students HOTS in PjBL based STEM learning in biology classroom: An experimental analysis. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043256 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Asrizal, A., Mardian, V., Novitra, F., & Festiyed, F. (2022). Physics electronic teaching material-integrated STEM education to promote 21st-century skills. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(8), 2899–2914. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i8.7357 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ata, P. F., Rahmadani, A., & Erika, F. (2023). Implementation of the PBL-STEM Model to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking on Reaction Rate Material. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 11(5), 645. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i5.8609 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12(Issue 5 & 6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bezanilla, M. J., & Galindo-Domínguez, H. (2021). Importance of Teaching Critical Thinking in Higher Education and Existing Difficulties According to Teacher’s Views. https://doi.org/10.4471/remie.2021.6159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bitzenbauer, P., Navarrete, S., Hennig, F., Ubben, M. S., & Veith, J. M. (2023). Cross-age study on secondary school students’ views of stars. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Evcİm, İ., & Arslan, M. (2022). An Investigation into the Development of the Force and Energy Unit through STEM Integration in Science Course and its Effects on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(3), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.3.398 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fatimah, H., Yamtinah, S., & Bramastia, B. (2023). Study of Ecology and Biodiversity Learning Based on Project Based Learning-Science Technology Engineering Mathematics (PjBLSTEM) in Empowering Students’ Critical Thinking. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 729– 736. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ha, V. T., Chung, L. H., Hanh, N. Van, & Hai, B. M. (2023). Teaching Science Using Argumentation-Supported 5E-STEM, 5E-STEM, and Conventional Didactic Methods: Differences in the Learning Outcomes of Middle School Students. Education Sciences, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Harianty, A. P., Medriati, R., & Purwanto, A. (2025). The Influence of STEM-PBL to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Straight Line Kinematics Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 16(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v16i1.1167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hebebci, M. T., & Usta, E. (2022). The Effects of Integrated STEM Education Practices on Problem Solving Skills, Scientific Creativity, and Critical Thinking Dispositions. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 358–379. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.143.9.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Khoirunnissa, R., Suwarma, I. R., & Muslim, M. (2024). The Implementation of STEM-PBL Learning to Enhance Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 10(1), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v10i1.6879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Loyens, S. M. M., van Meerten, J. E., Schaap, L., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Situating Higher-Order, Critical, and Critical-Analytic Thinking in Problem- and Project-Based Learning Environments: A Systematic Review. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 35, Issue 2). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mascarenhas, O. A. J., Thakur, M., & Kumar, P. (2023a). History of Critical Thinking and Some Models of Critical Thinking. In A Primer on Critical Thinking and Business Ethics (pp. 41–80). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-308-420231003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mascarenhas, O. A. J., Thakur, M., & Kumar, P. (2023b). Introduction: Why We Need Critical Thinking. In A Primer on Critical Thinking and Business Ethics (pp. 1–12). Emerald Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Piaget, J. (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence (M. Piercy & D. E. Berlyne, Trans.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pramasdyahsari, A. S., Setyawati, R. D., Aini, S. N., Nusuki, U., Arum, J. P., Astutik, L. D., Widodo, W., Zuliah, N., & Salmah, U. (2023). Fostering students’ mathematical critical thinking skills on number patterns through digital book STEM PjBL. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Prastika, F. R., Dasna, I. W., & Santoso, A. (2022). Implementation of Problem-Based Learning-Stem Strategy on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Critical Thinking in Fundamental of Chemical Equilibrium. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 28(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v28i1p1-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Puspita, L., Hidayah, N., & Puspitasari, N. (2022). The Effect of STEM-Fishbone diagram Learning on Critical Thinking Ability and Self-Efficacy: A Study on High School Students. Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIKA, 12(2), 270–281. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rohmah, N. S., Suryaningtyas, W., & Holisin, I. (2023). Implementation of the STEM-GeoGebra Integrated PjBL Model to Improve Student’s Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 14(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v14i2.83 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rosidin, U., Suyatna, A., & Abdurrahman, A. (2019). A combined HOTS-based assessment/STEM learning model to improve secondary students’ thinking skills: A development and evaluation study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.518464 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Thomas, D. R., & Larwin, K. H. (2023). A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of middle school STEM education: where are all the students of color? In International Journal of STEM Education (Vol. 10, Issue 1). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00425-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Thomason, D., & Hsu, P. L. (2025). The effect of a STEM integrated curriculum on design thinking dispositions in middle school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 35(1), 83–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09894-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2023). Fostering and assessing student critical thinking: From theory to teaching practice. European Journal of Education, 58(3), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12569 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. World Economic Forum. (2023). The Future of Jobs Report 2023 (World Economic Forum, Ed.). www.weforum.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Yaki, A. A. (2022). Fostering Critical Thinking Skills Using Integrated STEM Approach among Secondary School Biology Students. European Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 06. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/12481 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Yim, T.-S., Leung, C. Y., & Woo, K. T. (2024). Enhancing Integrated STEM Education through Underwater Robotics Competitions: A Project-based Learning Approach Incorporating [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Engineering Design Processes and Bloom’s Taxonomy. 2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON60312.2024.10578695 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles