The Evolving Landscape of Educational Management: A Systematic Review of Instructional and Distributed Leadership Frameworks

Synthesizing empirical research published between 2020 and 2024, this systematic review interrogates the complementary roles of Instructional and Distributed Leadership as frameworks for contemporary educational management. The analysis reveals a compelling synergy: Instructional Leadership establishes the essential academic focus, while Distributed Leadership describes the critical collaborative processes required for implementation. Findings from 28 peer-reviewed studies underscore how their integration fosters robust teaching quality, enhances student achievement, and builds organizational resilience, particularly in navigating post-pandemic challenges and advancing equity. Quantitative trends further substantiate these relationships, indicating medium to strong effect sizes for instructional leadership on student outcomes (e.g., β = 0.25-0.45) and significant positive correlations between leadership distribution and teacher efficacy (r = 0.30-0.55). The evidence concludes that a dual-framework approach provides a more complete and powerful model for effective school leadership.

systematic review, educational management

1. Adeyemo, J., & Zhou, M. (2022). Data-driven decision making in high-performing urban schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(3), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Carter, L., & Kim, H. (2024). Teacher leadership and school innovation: A social network analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(1), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hallinger, P. (2020). Science, sense and synergy: A review of studies in educational leadership 2000–2020. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(6), 951–969. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2020). Leadership for learning: A review of the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(4), 365–379. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Rivera, M., Chen, J., & Patel, S. (2023). Principal walkthroughs and teacher pedagogical shift: A longitudinal study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 34(2), 210–235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Sharma, S., & Petersen, A. (2021). Distributing instructional leadership: The case of instructional coaching teams. International Journal of Leadership in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1921824 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Thompson, V., Davis, R., & Zhang, L. (2022). Leadership during crisis: A national survey of school principals. Educational Researcher, 51(5), 321–335. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria