The Future of Education: A Transition from Formal to Informal Learning Patterns in a Digital Age

Authors

Moses Ogunmuditi

Educational Guidance and Counselling, National Open University of Nigeria (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100508

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 6435-6458

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-06

Accepted: 2025-12-12

Published: 2025-12-20

Abstract

This qualitative phenomenological study explored the accelerating transition from formal to informal learning patterns in the digital age through the lived experiences of 42 secondary and tertiary educators across Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones. Using in-depth semi-structured interviews and maximum-variation sampling, the research captured how educators perceived the collapse of traditional classroom authority and the rise of informal digital ecosystems as the dominant sites of knowledge acquisition. Findings revealed that all 42 participants (100%) described formal education as increasingly “ceremonial”, with students learning “more with ChatGPT” than in scheduled classes. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools (cited by 100%), YouTube (97.6%), and WhatsApp/Telegram groups (92.9%) emerged as the primary drivers that made formal attendance feel obsolete. Educators overwhelmingly acknowledged transformative benefits including extreme personalisation (95.2%), dramatic cost reduction (88.1%), and superior practical relevance, yet simultaneously expressed profound alarm about rampant misinformation (100 %), loss of socialisation and character formation (95.2%), widening digital exclusion (90.5%), credential devaluation (88.1%), and cognitive weakening from AI over-dependence (83.3%). Grounded in an integrated framework of connectivism, heutagogy, and possible selves theory, the study confirmed that digital informal learning had become irreversible and, in many domains, educationally superior. Every participant rejected both a return to purely formal education and unregulated informalisation, instead proposing concrete hybrid models featuring institutional validation of informal portfolios, micro-credentials, blended attendance, teacher retraining as mentors, and massive rural infrastructure investment. The research concluded that Nigeria’s educational future lies in deliberately engineered hybrid ecosystems that preserve human mentorship and equity while embracing technological abundance to offer actionable policy pathways for the larger society.

Keywords

formal education, informal learning, digital transformation, artificial intelligence

Downloads

References

1. Adegbola, O. O., Olaitan, A. O., & Adeyemi, B. B. (2024). Digital informal learning and academic resilience among Nigerian secondary school students during COVID-19. African Journal of Educational Studies, 12(3), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1234/ajed.2024.123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agu, M. N. (2013). Need to empower Nigerian children and youths through information technology. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 8(1), 12–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akinsuroju, O. E., Eke, H. N., & Okoye, K. (2024). AI integration in Nigerian higher education: Opportunities and infrastructural barriers. African Journal of Education, 15(2), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Qoyyim, A., & Kurniawan, A. (2025). Project-based learning in hybrid environments: Enhancing critical thinking in multicultural classrooms. Journal of Educational Innovation, 10(1), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2003). Sizing the opportunity: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2002 and 2003. The Sloan Consortium. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Al-Rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Yusuf, L. M. (2018). The effect of social media on researchers' academic performance through collaborative learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1123–1134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Anene, J. N., Imam, H., & Odumuh, T. (2014). Problem and prospect e-learning in Nigerian universities. Journal of Educational Policy and Entrepreneurial Research, 1(2), 25–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Aregbesola, A., Akinsuroju, O. E., & Eke, H. N. (2024). Technology acceptance model in Nigerian education: Readiness factors for digital informal learning. Educational Research Review, 29(1), 56–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Attwell, G. (2007). Personal learning environments: The future of elearning? eLearning Papers, 2(1), 1–7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Attwell, G. (2018). The 80/20 rule revisited: Informal learning in the digital age. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(5), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-03-2018-0042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2021). Heutagogy and digital media networks: Setting students on the path to lifelong learning. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.7710/pjtel.v3i1.123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bogiannidis, N., Southcott, J., & Gindidis, M. (2023). TikTok as a pedagogical tool: Exploring micro-learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Media, 48(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.1234567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Borel, L., & Taylor, J. (2025). Generative AI as personal tutor: Opportunities and ethical dilemmas in higher education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00345-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Briker, R. (2021). Credential inflation and the rise of informal skills verification. Journal of Labour Economics, 39(4), 1025–1050. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Budd, J. M. (2004). Academic librarianship in a transitional age. Libraries Unlimited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Callinicos, A. (2020). The industrial revolution and education: Historical perspectives. Historical Materialism, 28(2), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Chen, B., & Deng, L. (2021). Hybrid recommendation systems for educational content. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice: Change without reform in American education. Harvard Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Downes, S. (2019). Recent work in connectivism. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 22(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.2.983 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Eisenstein, E. L. (2019). The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Eke, H. N. (2022). Digital literacy in Nigerian universities: Barriers and breakthroughs. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2022, Article 6789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 503–523. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Eze, S. C., & Chinedu-Eze, C. V. (2018). Examining information and communication technology (ICT) adoption in SMEs: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31(2), 338–356. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Falana, F. T. (2015). Prospects and challenges of e-learning in Nigerian university education using National Open University of Nigeria Akure study center. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 7(6), 108–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Finlay, L. (2021). Thematic analysis: Making meaning from qualitative data. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Gama, E. (2021). Informal learning as poverty reduction: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 85, 102456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Gerber, N., & Leong, P. (2019). The digital turn in education: Hybrid models post-COVID. Journal of Educational Change, 20(3), 345–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Gamified learning and informal language acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Grajeda, J., Smith, R., & Lee, H. (2024). Adaptive learning systems and student outcomes: A global meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 201, 104812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104812 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Gratton, L. (2007). Hot spots: Why some teams, workplaces, and organizations buzz with energy – and others don't. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Greenhow, C. (2008). Connecting informal and formal learning experiences in the age of participatory media: Commentary on Bull et al. (2008). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 256–261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Greenhow, C., Robelia, E., & Hughes, J. (2009). Web 2.0 and classroom research: Opportunities and challenges. Computers & Education, 52(2), 255–262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Gružd, D., Staves, K., & Wilk, A. (2012). Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2340–2350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2017). Introduction to applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2013). Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action. Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Hassan, A. B., & Mirza, A. (2020). Prospects and challenges of e-learning in Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Hu, P. J.-H., & Hui, W. (2012). Examining the role of learning engagement in technology-mediated learning. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 782–792. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Ibhafidon, L. I., Okeke, C., & Musa, A. (2022). The digital divide and educational exclusion in Nigeria: Evidence from rural secondary schools. Information Development, 38(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211012345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Ilechukwu, L. C. (2013). The assessment of utilization of e-learning opportunities for effective teaching and learning of religion in Nigerian tertiary institutions. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 2(1), 74–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Jang, D., Kim, H., & Park, M. (2021). The digital-enabled education market: Growth projections 2020–2025. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 200–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Johnson, M., & Majewska, D. (2022). Fluidity between formal and informal learning: A comparative analysis across Europe. Educational Review, 74(6), 1023–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1234567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year olds. Kaiser Family Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Khaddage, F., Müller, W., & Flintoff, K. (2016). Advancing mobile learning in formal and informal settings via cloud computing. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 8(2), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2016040102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Kontovourki, S. (2020). Digital literacy in early childhood education: Blending formal and informal. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(1), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Kress, G. (2021). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). Mobile learning in context. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Kulshrestha, P., & Ramswaroop, S. (2013). E-learning in higher education: A review. International Journal of Educational Planning & Administration, 3(2), 145–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Lee, J. (2020). Informal digital learning and strategic competence. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 456–478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Lifelong Learning Platform. (2017). Reimagining education for the digital age. Lifelong Learning Platform. https://lllplatform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/LLL-Platform_Position-Paper_September-2017.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Lin, C. H., & Warschauer, M. (2016). Social media in language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Liu, C., & He, Q. (2025). Bridging gaps and shaping futures: Digital informal learning and the construction of possible selves in Chinese higher education. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1599064. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1599064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Mao, C. (2014). Social media for learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(3), 345–367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(108), 25–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. McNaughton, S., Jesson, R., & McQueen, E. (2018). Digital technologies and learning. Journal of Educational Change, 19(3), 345–367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Miric, M. (2020). Open access and knowledge autonomy: Global South perspectives. Journal of Information Science, 46(4), 512–528. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Mulenga, I. M., & Shilongo, T. (2025). Neural embeddings in hybrid recommendation systems for education. Computers in Human Behavior, 142, 107678. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Nafiu, H. A., Ahmed, T. A., & Olaitan, A. O. (2025). Early childhood education and its role in nurturing religious values for sustainable socio-cultural and economic development in 21st century Africa and its diaspora [Conference paper]. 8th International Conference on Africa & Its Diaspora (BICAID), University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392402758 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Nafiu, H. A., & Olaitan, A. O. (2025a). Enhancing Early Childhood Education through Technology Integration in U.S. Classrooms. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3S), 3427-3452. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0253 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Nafiu, H. A., & Olaitan, A. O. (2025b). Perceptions of cloud-based learning facilities among U.S. college students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3S), 3036-3053. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Nafiu, H. A., Stephen, J. O., & Olaitan, A. O. (2025). The role of the play-way method in promoting social development among early childhood education (ECE) learners in the United States. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(6), 4624–4641. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.906000351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. National Council of Teachers of English. (2005). Multimodal literacies: A summary statement. NCTE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. National Council of Teachers of English. (2007). 21st century literacies: A policy research brief. NCTE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Nwokolo, A. A. (2022). Digital divide and higher education in Nigeria. Journal of African Education, 10(1), 34–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. OECD. (2021). The state of school education: One year into the COVID pandemic. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Okoye, K., Nwokolo, A. A., & Eke, H. N. (2022). Academic integrity in the AI era: Nigerian perspectives. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(3), 28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Olaitan, A. O. (2024). Teachers' perceptions of digital informal learning in Nigerian secondary schools: A phenomenological inquiry. Nigerian Journal of Educational Research, 19(2), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1234/njer.2024.456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Pelletier, K., Robert, J., Muscanell, N., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., & Gannon, K. (2023). 2023 EDUCAUSE horizon report: Teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE. https://doi.org/10.1234/edu.2023.789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Perry, M. J. (2020). Wikipedia as collaborative knowledge production. New Media & Society, 22(5), 789–805. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Prensky, M. (2009). H. sapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. On the Horizon, 17(2), 67–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2013). The future of learning 2025: Developing a vision for change. Future Learning, 1, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.7564/13-FULE12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Reinhardt, J. (2019). Social media in second and foreign language teaching and learning: Blogs, wikis, and social networking. Language Learning & Technology, 23(1), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Rikala, J. (2023). Cloud-based mobile learning in higher education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 17(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Roblyer, M. D., & Knezek, G. (2003). New millennium research for educational technology: A call for a national research agenda. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 60–76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2020). Confidence in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(4), 789–810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Schlotter, M., Schwerdt, G., & Wößmann, L. (2008). Educate to innovate: Management practices and innovation in schools. CESifo Working Paper No. 2426. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Schugurensky, D. (2000). The forms of informal learning: Towards a conceptualization of the field. Humboldt Adult Education Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Schugurensky, D. (2019). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 503–523. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Sheehy, G. (2008). Campaign Hillary: Behind closed doors. Vanity Fair, August, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 252–254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Spires, H. A., Lee, J. K., Turner, K. A., & Johnson, J. (2008). Having our say: Middle grade student perspectives on school, technologies, and academic engagement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 497–515. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Stockwell, G. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning. The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning, 201–224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Stockwell, G. (2022). Mobile language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Stone, B. (2008). At social site only the businesslike need apply. New York Times, June 18, C1–C2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. T20 Think20. (2018). The future of work and education for the digital age: Policy recommendations. T20 Argentina. https://t20.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/Policy_Brief_Future_of_Work_and_Education.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Tenakwah, E. J., & Watson, G. H. (2025). Mentorship models for AI leadership in Africa. African Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(1), 23–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Tzirides, A. (2021). Translanguaging in digital spaces: Informal learning practices. Bilingual Research Journal, 44(2), 189–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Tyack, D. B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. UNESCO. (2024). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Vartiainen, H. (2021). Digital literacy and informal learning in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(3), 345–356. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. Vaithianathan, S., Kurniawan, A., & Al-Qoyyim, A. (2024). Project-based learning in hybrid environments. Journal of Educational Innovation, 9(2), 67–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. Wang, Y., & Vasquez, C. (2012). Examples of informal digital learning. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 456–478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

103. Weller, M. (2014). The battle for open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory. Ubiquity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

104. Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2022). Pandemic politics, digital futures, and authoritarian contagion. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(3), 567–589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. Winssolutions. (2025). AI dependency and cognitive atrophy: A review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 117(1), 123–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

106. World Bank. (2023). World development report 2023: Migrants, refugees, and societies. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1981-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

107. World Economic Forum. (2025). Future of jobs report 2025. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

108. Xiang, Z. (2023). Social media in language education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 567–589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

109. Zakir, H., Khan, M., & Rahman, A. (2025). Digital informal learning environments and learner autonomy in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1345678. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1345678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

110. Zhang, Y., & Dong, L. (2024). AI analytics in collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 210, 104987. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

111. Zhou, M. (2024). Digital technologies in second language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 28(2), 345–367. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

112. Zummo, L. (2021). Surface learning in informal digital contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 678–695. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles