The Impact of Auditor Competence on Fraud Detection in China

In recent years, the issue of corporate fraud has gained increasing attention in both academic research and professional practice, the role of auditors in fraud prevention and detection has become increasingly critical. This study investigates the impact of auditor competence—comprising technical knowledge, professional skepticism, and professional ethics—on fraud detection performance in China. Drawing on data from 382 practicing auditors and analyzed using SPSS statistical analysis, the findings reveal that all three dimensions significantly enhance auditors’ fraud detection capability, with professional skepticism exerting the strongest influence, followed by technical knowledge and professional ethics. These results suggest that a questioning mindset, analytical acumen, and ethical integrity collectively determine the effectiveness of fraud identification. In particular, professional skepticism enables auditors to critically evaluate audit evidence, challenge management assertions, and maintain vigilance when confronted with ambiguous or conflicting information. Technical knowledge equips auditors with the analytical and procedural skills necessary to identify complex fraud schemes, while professional ethics ensure that judgments remain objective and independent despite social or client-related pressures. The study also highlights the unique institutional and relational dynamics within the Chinese auditing context, where factors such as guanxi and regulatory expectations may influence auditor behavior. Practical implications emphasize the importance of enhancing continuous professional education, integrating ethics and skepticism into competency frameworks, and cultivating an audit culture that encourages transparency and critical inquiry. By linking core auditor competencies to measurable fraud detection outcomes, this research contributes to improving audit quality and reinforcing public confidence in financial reporting.

Auditor competence; fraud detection; professional skepticism; technical knowledge

1. Afroogh, S., Akbari, A., Malone, E., Kargar, M., & Alambeigi, H. (2024). Trust in AI: progress, challenges, and future directions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alao, A. I., Adebiyi, O. O., & Olaniyi, O. O. (2024). The interconnectedness of earnings management, corporate governance failures, and global economic stability: A critical examination of the impact of earnings manipulation on financial crises and investor trust in global markets. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 24(11), 47-73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alharasis, E. E. (2025). The implementation of IFRS electronic financial reporting–XBRL and usefulness of financial information: evidence from Jordanian finance industry. International Journal of Law and Management, 6(2), 33-45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aschauer, E., Fink, M., Moro, A., van Bakel-Auer, K., & Warming-Rasmussen, B. (2017). Trust and professional skepticism in the relationship between auditors and clients: Overcoming the dichotomy myth. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 29(1), 19-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Carpenter, T. D., & Reimers, J. L. (2013). Professional skepticism: The effects of a partner's influence and the level of fraud indicators on auditors' fraud judgments and actions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25(2), 45-69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chanaklang, A., Ussahawanitichakit, P., & Boonlua, S. (2015). AUDIT ADAPTATION COMPETENCY AND AUDIT SURVIVAL: A CONCEPTUAL PAPER. Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies. Proceedings, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cullinan, C. P., & Sutton, S. G. (2002). Defrauding the public interest: A critical examination of reengineered audit processes and the likelihood of detecting fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(3), 297-310. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. DeZoort, F. T., & Harrison, P. D. (2018). Understanding auditors’ sense of responsibility for detecting fraud within organizations. Journal of business ethics, 149(4), 857-874. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Drogalas, G., Pazarskis, M., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Papachristou, A. (2017). The effect of internal audit effectiveness, auditor responsibility and training in fraud detection. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 16(4), 434-454. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Friday, S. C., Ameyaw, M. N., & Jejeniwa, T. O. (2024). The Role of Auditors in Enforcing Ethical Standards in Corporations: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(6), 1591-1601. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Giroux, G. (2008). What Went Wrong? Accounting Fraud and Lessons from the Recent Scandals. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 75(4), 1205-1238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A journal of practice & theory, 32(Supplement 1), 45-97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jarah, B. A. F., Al Jarrah, M. A., Al-Zaqeba, M. A. A., & Al-Jarrah, M. F. M. (2022). The role of internal audit to reduce the effects of creative accounting on the reliability of financial statements in the Jordanian islamic banks. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(3), 60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Johnson, P. E., Grazioli, S., & Jamal, K. (1993). Fraud detection: Intentionality and deception in cognition. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(5), 467-488. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jumaili, S., Rahayu, S., & Rahayu, R. (2023). The effect of auditor's competence, experience, professional ethics, and auditor's professional skepticism on the auditor's ability in detecting fraud. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(3), 1687-1695. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kassem, R., & Higson, A. (2012). The new fraud triangle model. Journal of emerging trends in economics and management sciences, 3(3), 191-195. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Khaksar, J., Salehi, M., & Lari DashtBayaz, M. (2022). The relationship between auditor characteristics and fraud detection. Journal of Facilities Management, 20(1), 79-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kung, F. H., & Li Huang, C. (2013). Auditors' moral philosophies and ethical beliefs. Management decision, 51(3), 479-500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lee, S.-C., Su, J.-M., Tsai, S.-B., Lu, T.-L., & Dong, W. (2016). A comprehensive survey of government auditors’ self-efficacy and professional Development for improving audit quality. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lumbanraja, T. (2025). Role of Big Data Analytics in Enhancing Audit Decision-Making and Detecting Material Misstatements. Side: Scientific Development Journal, 2(1), 35-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mala, R., & Chand, P. (2015). Judgment and decision‐making research in auditing and accounting: future research implications of person, task, and environment perspective. Accounting Perspectives, 14(1), 1-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mansouri, A., Pirayesh, R., & Salehi, M. (2009). Audit competence and audit quality: Case in emerging economy. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(2), 17-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Martinov-Bennie, N., & Pflugrath, G. (2009). The strength of an accounting firm’s ethical environment and the quality of auditors’ judgments. Journal of business ethics, 87(2), 237-253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mat Ridzuan, N. I., Said, J., Razali, F. M., Abdul Manan, D. I., & Sulaiman, N. (2022). Examining the role of personality traits, digital technology skills and competency on the effectiveness of fraud risk assessment among external auditors. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(11), 536-548. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nelson, M., & Tan, H. T. (2005). Judgment and decision making research in auditing: A task, person, and interpersonal interaction perspective. Auditing: A journal of practice & theory, 24(s-1), 41-71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nemati, Z., Mohammadi, A., Bayat, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2024). Fraud Risk Prediction in Financial Statements through Comparative Analysis of Genetic Algorithm, Grey Wolf Optimization, and Particle Swarm Optimization. Iranian Journal of Finance, 8(1), 98-130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Noch, M. Y., Ibrahim, M. B. H., Akbar, M. A., Kartim, K., & Sutisman, E. (2022). Independence and competence on audit fraud detection: Role of professional skepticism as moderating. Jurnal Akuntansi, 26(1), 161-175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Oseifuah, E. K. (2025). Application of the fraud triangle model in mitigating tax evasion in developing countries: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), 7(2), 297-306. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Porcuna Enguix, L. (2021). The new EU remuneration policy as good but not desired corporate governance mechanism and the role of CSR disclosing. Sustainability, 13(10), 5476. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ren, L., Zhong, X., & Wan, L. (2022). Missing analyst forecasts and corporate fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of business ethics, 181(1), 171-194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rizwan, S., & Chughtai, S. (2023). Reestablishing the legitimacy after fraud: does corporate governance structure matter? South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 12(4), 537-558. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rumasukun, M. R. (2024). Developing auditor competencies through continuous training and education. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 4(1), 14-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rusli, A. A., Yusnaini, Y., & Sukanto, S. (2025). Enhancing Fraud Detection: Roles of Skepticism, Audit Technology, and Industry Specialization in Indonesia. Economics, Business, Accounting & Society Review, 4(1), 138-150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Tan, M., Lee, H., Wang, D., & Subramonyam, H. (2024). Is a seat at the table enough? Engaging teachers and students in dataset specification for ml in education. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1), 1-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. 2011. Making Sense of Cronbach's Alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2(5), 53-55 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Xanthopoulou, A., Skordoulis, M., Kalantonis, P., & Arsenos, P. (2024). Integrating corporate governance and forensic accounting: A sustainable corporate strategy against fraud. Journal of Governance and Regulation/Volume, 13(2), 23-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar