The Impact of Biophilic Interior Design on Pupil Well-being in Ugandan Primary Schools: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Study

A growing body of evidence links biophilic design to enhanced well-being in educational settings. However, this research is predominantly situated in high-income, developed countries, leaving a critical gap in understanding its effects in resource-constrained contexts. This study examined the effects of biophilic interior design on the emotional and social well-being of pupils in government-sponsored primary schools in Mukono District, Uganda. A convergent mixed-methods design was employed with 302 pupils (aged 11-12) from four purposively selected schools. Quantitative data were collected via a reliable 5-point Likert scale questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.895) measuring Emotional and Social Environment (ESE) and perceptions of four biophilic domains: Nature in Space (NIS), Sensory Nature Stimuli (SNS), Nature of Space (NOS), and Natural Analogues (NA). Qualitative data were gathered through 12 focus group interviews (n=4 pupils each) incorporating diamond ranking and visual elicitation board activities. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman's correlation, and multiple regression. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The regression model was statistically significant, F(4,297) = 74.34, p<.001, explaining 49.4% of the variance in well-being scores (Adjusted R²=0.494). All four biophilic domains were significant positive predictors, with NIS (β = 0.54, p<.001) and NOS (β = 0.47, p<.001) showing the strongest effects. Qualitative findings revealed that pupils strongly associated positive emotions with elements like natural light, views of greenery, and open, safe spaces for socializing, while expressing aversion to dark, paved, and poorly maintained environments. Biophilic design elements are powerful, significant predictors of pupil well-being in Ugandan primary schools. The convergence of quantitative and qualitative data provides robust, context-specific evidence that integrating these nature-based elements can profoundly enhance the emotional and social environment of learning spaces, offering a low-cost strategy for supporting holistic student development in resource-constrained settings.

Biophilic Design, Pupil Well-being, Mixed-Methods, Educational Environments

1. Asad, K. W. (2021). Primary and secondary education in Uganda: Challenges and prospects. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 4,(1) https://doi.org/10.53449/ije.v4i1.152 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Browning, M. H., & Rigolon, A. (2019). School green space and its impact on academic performance: A systematic literature review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(3), 429.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., Clancy, J. O.(2014): 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design, Terrapin Bright. New York: Terrapin Bright Green llc. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/wp- content/uploads/2014/09/14-Patterns-of-Biophilic-Design-Terrapin-2014p.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Browning, W., & Determan, J. (2024). Outcomes of biophilic design for schools. Architecture, 4(3), 479-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/architecture4030026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3), 83-86 Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kanonire, T., Kulikova, A., & Orel, E. (2022). Measuring Well-Being in School and University: Approaches and Challenges. IntechOpen. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.100658 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kellert, S. R. (2018). Nature by design: The practice of biophilic design. Yale University press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kellert, S.R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2008). Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life . John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Li, D., Chiang, Y. C., Sang, H., & Sullivan, W. C. (2019). Beyond the school grounds: Links between density of tree cover in school surroundings and high school academic performance. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 38, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mehta, A., & Mahamood, S.(2022).Biophilic design in transitional spaces of higher education buildings for mental well-being. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology,6(10),136-145. http://www.ijeast.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. O’brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & quantity, 41(5), 673-690. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Otto, S., Evans, G. W., Moon, M. J., & Kaiser, F. G. (2019). The development of children’s environmental attitude and behavior. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rolling, J., & Gerhard, M. (2022) Education in Developing Countries Retrieved from https://www.international.gc.ca/world-monde/issues_development enjeux_developpement/human_rights-droits_homme/education.aspx?lang=eng [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Seligman, M. E. (2012). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Atria Paperback. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment . New York: Plenum Press 85-125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study