The Impact of Effective Risk Management Committees on Employee Satisfaction and Performance in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions

The rapidly evolving educational landscape, marked by rising competition, globalization, and sustainability challenges, has heightened the importance of effective governance in higher education institutions (HEIs). Risk Management Committees (RMCs) play a critical role in navigating uncertainties and fostering institutional stability. This study investigates the impact of RMCs effectiveness on employee performance, with employee satisfaction serving as a mediating variable, within the context of Malaysian HEIs. Drawing on institutional theory, the research examines how RMCs practices not only achieve functional objectives but also enhance legitimacy, contributing to improved employee satisfaction and performance. The data was collected through online questionnaires from 126 employees across public and private HEIs. Structural equation modelling (SEM) using SmartPLS 4.0 was employed to evaluate the relationships between RMCs effectiveness, employee satisfaction, and employee performance. The results reveal that RMCs effectiveness significantly impacts both employee satisfaction and performance, with satisfaction mediating this relationship. The study underscores the crucial mediating role of employee satisfaction, which bridges the relationship between RMCs effectiveness and employee performance. These findings highlight the critical role of satisfaction in translating governance practices into tangible performance improvements. This research provides actionable insights for HEI administrators and policymakers, emphasizing the need for robust RMCs structures and employee-centred strategies. The study also contributes to the literature by extending the application of Institutional Theory to the education sector, offering a comprehensive framework for aligning governance practices with employee outcomes.

Risk Management Committees; Employee Satisfaction; Employee Performance; Higher Education Institutions

1. Abdelwahed, N. A. A., & Doghan, M. A. A. (2023). Developing Employee Productivity and Performance through Work Engagement and Organizational Factors in an Educational Society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Societies, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13030065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmad, S. N., Isa, M. Y., & Tapa, A. (2016). Web Disclosure of Risk Management Practices in Malaysian Public Universities. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v6-i11/2409 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anderson, R., & Gupta, V. (2023). Risk management and stakeholder engagement in higher education institutions. Journal of Academic Administration, 48(2), 152-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.1085102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Araújo, A., & Gomes, A. M. (2021). Risk management in the public sector: Challenges in its adoption by Brazilian federal universities. Revista Contabilidade & Financas, 32(86), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057X202112300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Asad, A., Mehmood, S., Hussain, S., & Amir, M. (2023). Analysis of Risk Management in Higher Education Institution. International Research Journal of Management and Social Sciences, IV. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10499455 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Azmy, A. (2024). Employee satisfaction factors in the e-commerce company: the mediating role of employee engagement. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business: JIEB., 39(1), 28-56. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v39i1.6936 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Brown, A., Chen, L., & Scott, W. (2021). Institutional theory and organizational resilience in HEIs: The role of risk management committees. Journal of Organizational Theory, 18(1), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1072039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Yu, S., & Yu, S. (2024). Utilizing social media for community risk communication in megacities: analysing the impact of WeChat group information interaction and perception on communication satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in Shanghai. BMC Public Health, 24, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19276-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, Y., Li, S., & Sun, R. (2020). Leadership and risk management in HEIs: A review of communication strategies. Journal of Higher Education Research, 42(1), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2020.1072555 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Clark, E., & Chen, H. (2023). Risk committee leadership and communication in HEIs: Effects on employee trust. International Journal of Risk and Compliance, 39(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.1072503 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Clark, T., & Lee, D. (2022). Hygiene and motivation factors in HEIs: The role of risk management. Journal of Educational Psychology, 40(3), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2022.1093021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The Tailored Design Method: 2007 update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide (Updated ed.). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R. A., & Schmidt, S. (2020). Stakeholder theory and the modern institution: Managing for employee satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(2), 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04372-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Green, T., & Choi, J. (2020). Health and safety in educational institutions: The role of risk management committees in promoting employee performance. International Journal of Academic Administration, 29(3), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2020.1072059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (2021). The motivation to work in educational institutions: Implications for risk management. Journal of Work Psychology, 59(4), 310-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1072119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Itzchakov, G., Weinstein, N., & Cheshin, A. (2023). Learning to listen: Downstream effects of listening training on employees' relatedness, burnout, and turnover intentions. Human Resource Management, 62(4), 565-580.https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Johnson, P., & Taylor, S. (2023). Risk management in HEIs: Decision-making frameworks and employee well-being. International Journal of Decision Theory, 36(4), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.1072152 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kim, H., & Park, J. (2023). Risk management as a hygiene factor: Implications for employee satisfaction in HEIs. Journal of Higher Education Policy, 50(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.1072174 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Krekel, C., Ward, G., & De Neve, J. E. (2019). Employee well-being, productivity, and firm performance: Evidence and case studies. Saïd Business School WP 2019-04, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3356581 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lee, J., & Wang, Y. (2023). Transparency in decision-making: The impact of risk management on employee satisfaction in higher education institutions. Journal of Institutional Research, 39(1), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.1072209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Li, H., & Thompson, M. (2022). Financial stability and employee productivity in HEIs: The impact of risk management frameworks. Journal of Educational Economics, 37(4), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2022.1072257 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Marks, M. F. (2024). The Loyalty Metric: How Employee Satisfaction & Engagement Impacts Organization Loyalty (Order No. 31633087). Available from Publicly Available Content Database. (3135019262). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/loyalty-metric-how-employee-satisfaction-amp/docview/3135019262/se-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Miller, P., & Yang, X. (2022). Employee engagement and performance in risk-managed environments: Evidence from HEIs. Higher Education Studies, 50(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2022.1072265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mohd-Sanusi, Z., Motjaba-Nia, S., Roosle, N. A., Sari, R. N., & Harjitok, A. (2017). International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues Effects of Corporate Governance Structures on Enterprise Risk Management Practices in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(1), 6–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Muhajiroh, N., & Noermijati. (2024). Impact of transformational leadership and psychological contract on employee performance with job satisfaction as a mediating variable. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 13(4), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i4.3320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Musevenzo, T., Mashavira, N., Chikove, M., & Matenda, F. R. (2024). Employee engagement, job satisfaction and decent work in the Zimbabwean gold mining sector. SA Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v22i0.2710 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Phillips, A., & Caldwell, J. (2021). Stakeholder theory in practice: Risk management for employee well-being in higher education. Journal of Organizational Ethics, 22(3), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1072289 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Platania, S., Morando, M., Gruttadauria, S. V., & Koopmans, L. (2024). The individual work performance questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the italian version. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14010004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Rajasekaran, K., Mehta, D., & Patil, S. (2021). Best practices in risk committee governance: Higher education perspectives. Journal of Risk and Regulatory Affairs, 14(3), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1072298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Roberts, A., & Turner, S. (2020). Stakeholder engagement and risk management in educational settings. Journal of Organizational Management, 44(1), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2020.1072529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sabeng, D. A., & Mensah, J. V. (2023). Job satisfaction and characteristics among staff of public higher educational institutions in Ghana. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2226457 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Scott, W. R. (2020). Institutional theory and its implications for HEI governance. Higher Education Research, 42(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2020.1072306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Setapa, M., Mamat, M., Bakar, H. A., Yusuf, S. N. S., & Kazemian, S. (2020). Enterprise risk management: Impact on performance of private higher educational institutions in Malaysia. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 22(1), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.22.1.31 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sharif, F., & Sharif, S. (2017) The Relationship of Workplace Design on Employees’ Perceived Productivity: A Case of Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Social Sciences & Interdisciplinary Research, 6(1), 1-22., https://ssrn.com/abstract=2891621 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Smith, L., Xiong, H., & Wang, Y. (2022). Reducing workplace stress through effective risk management in HEIs: A performance perspective. Journal of Higher Education Policy, 19(2), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2022.1072320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sum, R. M., & Saad, Z. M. (2017). Risk management in universities. 3rd International Conference on Qalb-Guided Leadership in Higher Education Institutions, 128-142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Tan, L., Chong, S., & Wong, P. (2023). Data protection and employee performance: The role of risk management in HEIs. Journal of Academic Compliance, 17(1), 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.1072356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Tashliyev, A., & Tirtoprojo, S. (2023). Examining the factors affecting employee performance of higher education institution employee in the new normal era. International Journal of Economics and Business Issues, 2(1), 47-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2021). Behavioral economics and decision-making in risk management: Applications in HEIs. Journal of Risk Analysis, 47(2), 305-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1072374 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tiauzon, M. J., Moyani Jr, G., Bautista, M., & Maguate, G. (2023). Management Skills of Department Heads in Relation to Employees Work Performance. Valley International Journal Digital Library, 5327-5334. https://vipublisher.com/index.php/vij/article/download/85/78 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tze Yin, K., Ai Ping, T., Siti Nabiha, A. K., & Sukumar, L. (2023). Does Enterprise Risk Management Influence Performance? Evidence from Malaysian Private Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Advanced Research in Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.55057/ijaref.2023.5.1.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Wong, T., & Patel, A. (2021). Creating a structured workplace environment: Risk management policies in higher education. Journal of Institutional Research, 31(3), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1072398 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Young, J., Li, F., & Shin, M. (2022). Employee satisfaction and risk management practices in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Strategy, 35(2), 214-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2022.1072451 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Youssef, N., & Kaur, P. (2023). Accountability and performance: Risk management’s influence in higher education institutions. Journal of Academic Governance, 28(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.1072423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Zhang, W., Liu, Q., & Wei, Y. (2021). Risk management and productivity in higher education institutions: A North American case study. Journal of Higher Education Strategy, 31(4), 348-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2021.1072478 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Zhao, X., Qiang, L., & Wei, F. (2022). Employee satisfaction and its drivers in higher education institutions. Journal of Institutional Research, 31(4), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2022.1072467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Zhetpisbayeva, B., Khussainova, Z., Shunkeyeva, S., &Akybayeva, G. (2024). Risk management in higher education institutions: existing research frontiers and their applied extrapolation. National Center for Higher Education Development, 3(47). https://doi.org/10.59787/2413-5488-2024-47-3-70-78 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
• Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
• Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
• Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
• Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria