The Impact of Talent Management Practices on Employee Retention: An Empirical Study on the SME Industry of Bangladesh

Authors

Tahmina Khanam.

Tahmina Khanam, Associate Professor, Department of Management, University of Dhaka (Bangladesh)

Farhana Foysal Satata

Farhana Faisal Satata, Lecturer, South East University (Bangladesh)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.914MG00213

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 9/14 | Page No: 2772-2791

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-27

Accepted: 2025-11-05

Published: 2025-11-21

Abstract

Small and Medium Size Enterprises (SMEs) are considered major contributor in the overall development of an economy and Bangladesh is no different. But in case of retaining talent management SMEs are struggling with their limited resources, poor employee branding and formal human resource management practices within their organizations. This article investigated how the Talent Management Practices (TMP) influence the Employee Retention (ER) in SME sector where the mediating variables were identified as Workplace Culture (WC) and Employee Engagement (EE). TMP construct included identification of critical positions, compensation practices, training and development and talent recruitment. Coupling with Resource-Based View Theory, the study had taken seven hypotheses which examined the direct and mediated effect of TMP, WC, EE, and ER.
In order to examine the hypothesis the study conducted a survey on 425 employees and managers of SMEs of the manufacturing, services, trading, and technology industries in Bangladesh. Smart PLS 4 was used to analyse the data in order to measure model and structural model. All the offered hypotheses are confirmed in the results demonstrating that TMP has a positive impact on ER but not only directly, but also indirectly through WC and EE. The results of the analysis indicated that well-formulated talent practices and positive work environment play constructive roles in employee engagement and retention, which eventually can ensure the attainment of SMEs competitive advantage and corporate sustainability.
The theoretical contribution of the study is the contextualisation of TMP, WC and EE in the context of SMEs in developing economy, and its contribution to the body of empirical evidence of mediating mechanism of engagement and culture. The study suggested several recommendations for SME managers and policymakers that can be used in developing effective low-cost methods of retaining talents. This study also highlights the need of incorporating HR interventions to reflect their alignment with organizational culture and enhance workforce stability, and organizational performance in resource-poor settings

Keywords

Talent Management Practices, Employee Retention, Employee Engagement

Downloads

References

1. Abdullahi, I., et al. (2022). Talent management and employee engagement in SMEs. Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abdullahi, M. S., Adeiza, A., Abdelfattah, F., Fatma, M., Fawehinmi, O., & Aigbogun, O. (2022). Talent management practices on employee performance: A mediating role of employee engagement in institution of higher learning: Quantitative analysis. Industrial and Commercial Training, 54(4), 589–612. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alagaraja, M., & Shuck, B. (2015). Exploring organizational alignment–Employee engagement linkages and impact on individual performance: A conceptual model. Human Resource Development Review, 14(1), 17–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Albrecht, S. L., & Marty, A. (2020). Personality, self-efficacy and job resources and their associations with employee engagement, affective commitment and turnover intentions. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(5), 657–681. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Albrecht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A. M. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1), 7–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Albrecht, S., Bakker, A., Gruman, J., Macey, W., & Saks, A. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 2(1), 7–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Amushila, J., & Bussin, M. H. R. (2021). The effect of talent management practices on employee retention at the Namibia University of Science and Technology. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, Article a1485. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., & Fletcher, L. (2017). The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 31–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job Demands–Resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bal, P. M., de Cooman, R., & Mol, S. T. (2013). Dynamics of psychological contracts with work engagement and turnover intention. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(1), 107–122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bangladesh Bank. (2016). SME & special programmes department: SME definition. Bangladesh Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Batt, R. (2002). Managing customer services: Human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 587–597. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and human resource management (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information systems research, 14(2), 189-217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Chuang, C. H., Chen, S. J., & Chuang, C. W. (2016). HRM practices and service-oriented OCB: The role of culture. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 55, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009). Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 19(4), 304–313. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 501–528. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Contoghiorghes, C. (2016). Linking high performance organizational culture and talent management: Satisfaction/motivation and organizational commitment as mediators. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(16), 1833–1853. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. De Boeck, G., Meyers, M. C., & Dries, N. (2018). Employee reactions to talent management: A qualitative study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 199–213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). Work engagement and Machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 35–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Dhaka Tribune. (2019, April 25). Bangladesh’s SMEs held back by lack of proper definition. Dhaka Tribune. https://www.dhakatribune.com/business/economy/2019/04/25/bangladesh-s-smes-held-back-by-lack-of-proper-definition [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Dries, N. (2013). The psychology of talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 272–285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Eichhorn, B. R. (2014). Common method variance techniques. Cleveland State University, Department of Operations & Supply Chain Management. Cleveland, OH: SAS Institute Inc, 1(11). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Fischer, D. G., & Fick, C. (1993). Measuring social desirability: Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(2), 417-424. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Gujarati, D. (1970). Use of dummy variables in testing for equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions: a note. The American Statistician, 24(1), 50-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European journal of marketing, 53(4), 566-584. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Hakanen, J. J., & Roodt, G. (2010). Using the Job Demands–Resources model to predict engagement. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 85–101). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102–117). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Hausknecht, J. P., & Trevor, C. O. (2011). Collective turnover at the group, unit, and organizational levels: Evidence, issues, and implications. Journal of Management, 37(1), 352–388. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Henseler, J., & Fassott, G. (2010). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: An illustration of available procedures. Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications, 713-735. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ismail, F., Heng, K. K., Ng, W. F., & Imran, M. (2021). Talent management practices, employee engagement and employee retention: Empirical evidence from Malaysian SMEs. Economics, Ecology, & Axiology (EEA), 39(10). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Jayaraman, S., Talib, P., & Khan, A. F. (2018). Integrated talent management scale: Construction and initial validation. SAGE Open, 8(3), 2158244018780965. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence outcomes? Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264–1294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Keyko, K., Cummings, G. G., Yonge, O., & Wong, C. A. (2016). Work engagement in professional nursing practice: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 61, 142–164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Kontoghiorghes, C. (2016). Employee engagement and SMEs: Strategies for resource-constrained firms. European Journal of Training and Development, 40(5), 306–324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Kontoghiorghes, C. (2016). Linking high performance organizational culture and talent management: Satisfaction/motivation and organizational commitment as mediators. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(16), 1833–1853. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Kundu, S. C., & Gahlawat, N. (2016). High performance work systems and organizational performance: The role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3665–3678. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Lee, C. H., Woo, H., & Kim, J. (2019). Cross-cultural examination of engagement and retention. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 57(1), 105–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS quarterly, 293-334. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). Psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Meyers, M. C., & van Woerkom, M. (2014). The influence of underlying philosophies on talent management: Theory, implications for practice, and research agenda. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 192–203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Ministry of Industries. (2010). National industrial policy 2010. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Ogbonnaya, C., & Messersmith, J. G. (2019). Employee performance, wellbeing, and differential pathways of HRM subdimensions. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(3), 509–526. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Pandita, D., & Ray, S. (2018). Talent management and employee engagement — a meta-analysis of their impact on talent retention. Industrial and Commercial Training, 50(4), 185–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Payambarpour, A., & Hooi, L. W. (2015). Talent management in SMEs. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 5(2), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Payambarpour, S. A., & Hooi, L. W. (2015). The impact of talent management and employee engagement on organisational performance. International Journal of Management Practice, 8(4), 311–336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Peccei, R., van de Voorde, K., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2021). HRM, well-being and performance: A systematic review and integrative framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(2), 241–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Poocharoen, O.-o., & Lee, C. (2013). Talent management in the public sector: A comparative study of Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand. Public Management Review, 15(8), 1185–1207. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Posthuma, R. A., Campion, M. C., Masimova, M., & Campion, M. A. (2013). A high performance work practices taxonomy: Integrating the literature and directing future research. Personnel Psychology, 66(1), 113–172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Mooi, E. A. (2009). Response-based segmentation using finite mixture partial least squares: theoretical foundations and an application to American customer satisfaction index data. In Data mining: Special issue in annals of information systems (pp. 19-49): Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6(1), 19–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Saleh, R., & Atan, T. (2021). The involvement of sustainable talent management practices on employee’s job satisfaction: Mediating effect of organizational culture. Sustainability, 13(23), 13320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 10–24). Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Shuck, B., Rocco, T. S., & Albornoz, C. A. (2011). Exploring employee engagement from the employee perspective: Implications for HRD. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(4), 300–325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Shuck, B., Twyford, D., Reio, T. G., & Shuck, A. (2014). Human resource development practices and employee engagement: Examining the connection with employee turnover intentions and psychological climate. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(2), 239–270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Singh, S. K., Gupta, S., Busso, D., & Kamboj, S. (2020). Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 128, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Subramony, M. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between HRM bundles and firm performance. Human Resource Management, 48(5), 745–768. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and customer satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 558–577. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Tanton, S. (2007). Talent management in the role of employee retention. University of South Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27(6), 701–721. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles