The Influential Role of Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory on Leadership Behaviors and Decision-Making in Organizational Contexts

Authors

Aevan Justinn A. Galario

Teacher III, Valencia City Central School, Department of Education (Philippines)

Evelyn A. Vicente

Teacher III, Valencia City Central School, Department of Education (Philippines)

Gladys S. Escarlos

College of Education, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000265

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 3255-3261

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-28

Accepted: 2025-11-03

Published: 2025-11-10

Abstract

This article presents a systematic review of Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and its influential role in shaping leadership behaviors and decision-making within organizational contexts. The review synthesizes current literature, emphasizing SCT’s core constructs reciprocal determinism, self-efficacy, observational learning, and outcome expectations as key mechanisms through which leaders learn, model, and adapt their actions in dynamic workplace environments. Using structured methodology, the analysis demonstrates that effective leaders foster ethical culture, resilience, and collaborative decision-making by leveraging personal belief systems and environmental feedback. Findings highlight the reciprocal relationship between individual cognition, social modeling, and organizational culture, showing that leadership practices are continuously refined through social learning processes. Overall, the article affirms the relevance of SCT, providing practical and theoretical guidance for cultivating adaptive, ethical, and effective leadership in contemporary settings.

Keywords

Reciprocal Determinism, Self-efficacy, Observational Learning

Downloads

References

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gibson, C. B. (2004). From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: Cycles of collective cognition in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 453-472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. McCormick, M. J. (2001). Self-efficacy and leadership effectiveness: Applying social cognitive theory to leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 8(1), 22-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Koutroubas, T., & Galanakis, M. (2022). Social cognitive theory and leadership development: A review. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 18(2), 55-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2008). Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(6), 669-692. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. ScienceDirect. (2024). A social cognitive approach investigating the role of self-efficacy in management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Frontiers in Psychology. (2025). The perspectives of social cognitive career theory in contemporary organizations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Positive Psychology. (2025). Bandura's Social Learning Theory: Key principles and applications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles