The Interplay of Leadership Styles and Millennial Motivation: A Conceptual Paper

The contemporary workplace is being transformed by rapid technological advancement and generational shifts, with Millennials now constituting a dominant segment of the global workforce. As a cohort characterized by distinct values, motivations, and work preferences, Millennials have redefined expectations for leadership, engagement, and organizational culture. However, despite extensive research on leadership effectiveness, there remains limited conceptual understanding of how different leadership styles influence Millennial motivation within technology-driven and Industry 4.0 workplaces. This conceptual and qualitatively oriented paper explores the interplay between leadership styles and Millennial motivation, positioning the discussion within the broader framework of human capital development in modern organizations. Drawing on transformational, transactional, situational, servant, and democratic leadership theories, and integrating motivational models such as Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, the paper conceptualizes leadership as a mediating force that connects organizational goals with Millennial motivational drivers. The proposed conceptual framework illustrates how adaptive, inclusive, and empowering leadership approaches can enhance intrinsic motivation, engagement, and performance among Millennial employees. From a theoretical standpoint, this study contributes to leadership and motivation scholarship by synthesizing SDT and Herzberg’s framework within a generational context and proposing a model for future empirical testing through Constructivist Grounded Theory. From a practical perspective, the findings offer actionable guidance for organizations and policymakers to design leadership development strategies that align with Millennial values of autonomy, purpose, and continuous growth. Overall, the paper underscores the importance of hybrid, human-centered leadership in fostering sustainable motivation and organizational success in the digital age.

Leadership styles; Millennials; Workplace motivation

1. Agusta, N. F., & Azmy, A. (2023). Servant leadership and career development: supporting employee growth. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(12), 350-360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Kasasbeh, O. (2024). Exploring the Nexus between Leadership Styles, Employee Engagement, and Organizational Performance a Multidimensional Review. HISTORICAL: Journal of History and Social Sciences, 3(2), 154-168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Antariksa, S. K. S. & Budiadi, H. (2024). Examining the Role of Transformational Leadership in Enhancing Employee Engagement and Organizational Effectiveness: Insights from Human Resource Management. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(9), pp. 2087–2103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Autin, K.L., Herdt, M.E., Garcia, R.G. & Ezema, G.N. (2021). Basic psychological need satisfaction, autonomous motivation, and meaningful work: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Career Assessment, 30(1), pp.78-93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Basit, A., Sebastian, V. & Hassan, Z. (2018). Impact of Leadership style on Employee Performance (a case study on a private organization in Malaysia). International Journal of Accounting & Business Management, 5(2), pp.112-130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bhatt, N., Chitranshi, J. & Mehta, M. (2022). Testing Herzberg's two factor theory on millennials. Cardiometry, (22), pp.231-236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Butler, C.L., Sutton, C., Mockaitis, A.I. & Zander, L. (2020). The new millennial global leaders: what a difference a generation makes!. In Research handbook of global leadership (pp. 141-163). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cahyono, N.D. (2024). Enhancing organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership: a comprehensive analysis. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(8), pp.1794-1804 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Calk, R. & Patrick, A. (2017). Millennials through the looking glass: Workplace motivating factors. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 16(2), pp.131-139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Charmaz, K. (2021). The genesis, grounds, and growth of constructivist grounded theory. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chen, L., Wadei, K.A., Bai, S. & Liu, J. (2020). Participative leadership and employee creativity: a sequential mediation model of psychological safety and creative process engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(6), pp.741-759. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chopra, A. & Bhilare, P. (2020). Future of work: An empirical study to understand expectations of the millennials from organizations. Business Perspectives and Research, 8(2), pp.272-288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Darby, V. & Morrell, D.L. (2019). Generations at work: A review of generational traits and motivational practices impacting millennial employees. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dombestein, H., Norheim, A. & Lunde Husebø, A.M. (2020). Understanding informal caregivers' motivation from the perspective of self‐determination theory: An integrative review. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 34(2), pp.267-279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dong, B. (2023). A systematic review of the transactional leadership literature and future outlook. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 2(3), pp.21-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Easton, C. & Steyn, R. (2022). Leadership styles and effectiveness in the workplace: A perspective of the millennial generation. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 25(1), p.4541. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Forner, V.W., Jones, M., Berry, Y. & Eidenfalk, J. (2020). Motivating workers: how leaders apply self-determination theory in organizations. Organization Management Journal, 18(2), pp.76-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Guo, M. (2023). Motivation at work: An analysis from the self-determination theory perspective. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 180, p. 03017). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hakim, A.L., Faizah, E.N. & Mas' adah, N. (2021). Analysis of leadership style by using the model of Hersey and Blanchard. Journal of Leadership in Organizations, 3(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Huyler, D., Pierre, Y., Ding, W., & Norelus, A. (2015). Millennials in the Workplace: Positioning Companies for Future Success. SFERC 2015, 114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Jaffar, H., Munir, A.J. & Waqas, M.M. (2024). Assessing the Impact of Herzberg’s Two-Factor Motivation Theory on Job Satisfaction: A Study of Employees in the Punjab Healthcare Commission. Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies, 6(3), pp.469-480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Jaqua, E. & Jaqua, T. (2021). Transactional leadership. American Journal of Biomedical Science and Research, 14(5), pp.399-400.. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Koncar, P., Santos, T., Strohmaier, M. & Helic, D. (2022). On the application of the Two-Factor Theory to online employer reviews. Journal of Data, Information and Management, 4(1), pp.1-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Li, X. (2023). Shared Leadership and Employee Motivation Relationship. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 3(3), pp.130-132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Luria, E. (2022). Revisiting the self-determination theory-motivating the unmotivated. Educational Practice and Theory, 44(2), pp.5-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Manyuchi, M. & Sukdeo, N. (2021). Application of the situational leadership model to achieve effective performance in mining organizations teams. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 412-416). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Meuser, J.D. & Smallfield, J. (2023). Servant leadership: The missing community component. Business Horizons, 66(2), pp.251-264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mitsakis, M. & Galanakis, M. (2022). An empirical examination of Herzberg’s theory in the 21st century workplace. Organizational psychology re-examined. Psychology, 13(2), pp.264-272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nababan, L., Lee, J.K., Al Kafit, M.A. & Hidayatullah, M.F.F. (2024). PREFERRED LEADERSHIP STYLES FOR MILLENIALS GENERATION: A LITERATURE REVIEW. EKOBIS: Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 12(1), pp.29-38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nauman, S., Musawir, A.U., Malik, S.Z. & Munir, H. (2022). Servant leadership and project success: unleashing the missing links of work engagement, project work withdrawal, and project identification. Project Management Journal, 53(3), pp.257-276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Nyamboga, T.O. (2025). Strategic Leadership in Multigenerational Workforces: Bridging Generational Divides for Enhanced Engagement. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 19(1), pp.270-285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Purnomo, J. & Pudjiarti, E.S. (2024). Navigasi Kepemimpinan Di Era Digital: Tantangan Dan Peluang Bagi Generasi Milenial. Transformasi: Journal of Economics and Business Management, 3(1), pp.221-238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Reavis, M., Singh, K. & Tucci, J. (2021). Millennials' strategic decision making through the lens of corporate social responsibility and financial management. Journal of Business Strategies, 38(2), p.125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Reyaz, S. (2024). The influence of leadership styles on employee motivation and job satisfaction. International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering and Management (IRJAEM), 2(3), pp.339-344. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ronald, B. & Marc, L. (2021). The leadership challenge in times of the COVTD 19 pandemic-An empirical investigation on the impact of transformational leadership on motivation and team performance. Advances in Management, 14(3), pp.1-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, p.101860. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ser, E.M. & Webber, J.K. (2024). Herzberg’s motivational factors applied to generational influencers. Journal of Management History, (ahead-of-print). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sharma, R. (2024). Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: A Comparative Study in the Modern Workplace. Journal of Advanced Management Studies, 1(2), pp.1-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Singh, P., & Kumar, A. (2023). Influence of Transactional Leadership Styles on Employee Motivation. Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology, 44(3), pp. 1738-1743 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Slemp, G.R., Lee, M.A. & Mossman, L.H. (2021). Interventions to support autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs in organizations: A systematic review with recommendations for research and practice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(2), pp.427-457. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Sruk, B. (2020). How Millennials are changing organizations and business models–New values, new principles, new culture. In DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting, 5(1), pp.101-108. Sveučilište u Dubrovniku. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Suryadi, Y., Dewi, N.L.Y., Trisnawati, T. & Al-Amin, A.A. (2024). The Impact Of Transformational Leadership On Organizational Performance And Employee Motivation. Transforma Jurnal Manajemen, 2(2), pp.65-76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Tesmer, K., & Oxenford, C.B. (2021). The Key to Employee Motivation: A Competitive Leadership Approach. Journal of Student Research, 9(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Valenti, A. (2019). Leadership preferences of the millennial generation. Journal of Business Diversity, 19(1), pp.75-84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Wandhe, D.P. (2024). The new generation: Understanding millennials and Gen Z. Available at SSRN 4716585. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Wang, Q., Hou, H. & Li, Z. (2022). Participative leadership: A literature review and prospects for future research. Frontiers in psychology, 13, p.924357. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Westover, J.H. (2024). Younger Generations Want To Change Jobs: Here’s How Employers Can Keep Them. Human Capital Leadership Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Whitehead, T. (2021). A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Millennial Motivational Profiles and Leadership Preferences (Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Widjaja, M.E. (2020). Producing Millennial Generation Leaders in Addressing Change and Meeting the Challenges of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Is Strike Relevant in the Modern Era? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing, IT/Ites, FMCG, Electronics and Emerging Sectors
• A Qualitative Exploration of Work-Life Balance Among Private Universities Lecturers in Klang Valley
• Leadership Styles and Employee Motivation: Examining the Impact on Job Satisfaction and Turnover
• Human Resource Management, Organizational Culture, and Good Governance Practices: A Structural Equation Model on Service Orientation among Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation in Davao Region
• Cost of Silence: Exploring the Impact of Organisational Silence on Employee Engagement